外逃犯诉苦：吃了4个月黄瓜 ZZ# Joke - 肚皮舞运动
R*1
1 楼
以下是引用
“
On August 18, 2015, the Washington Alliance of Technology Workers (WashTech)
filed a notice of appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit [Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-529]. It is likely
that WashTech will challenge the District Court's August 12, 2015
determination that establishing the STEM OPT benefit in 2008 was within the
scope of DHS's regulatory authority.
”
出处 http://www.nafsa.org/Find_Resources/Supporting_International_Students_And_Scholars/ISS_Issues/Issues/Focus_On_STEM_OPT/
有没有学习法律的同学可以解释一下，这样的话，一审的裁决还会实行么？还是等新的
司法解释？
“
On August 18, 2015, the Washington Alliance of Technology Workers (WashTech)
filed a notice of appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit [Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-529]. It is likely
that WashTech will challenge the District Court's August 12, 2015
determination that establishing the STEM OPT benefit in 2008 was within the
scope of DHS's regulatory authority.
”
出处 http://www.nafsa.org/Find_Resources/Supporting_International_Students_And_Scholars/ISS_Issues/Issues/Focus_On_STEM_OPT/
有没有学习法律的同学可以解释一下，这样的话，一审的裁决还会实行么？还是等新的
司法解释？
