d*2
2 楼
http://finance.yahoo.com/career-work/article/110930/millionaires-collecting-unemployment?mod=career-worklife_balance
by Daniel Indiviglio
Tuesday, October 5, 2010
provided by
atlantic_logo.gif
If you were making $1 million per year or more, but lost your job, would you file an unemployment claim? Nearly 3,000 American millionaires would have answered "yes" to this question in 2008, according to an article by Ryan J. Donmoyer at Bloomberg. IRS data shows that a whopping 2,840 households earning at least $1 million in 2008 also filed for government unemployment payments that year. There are two sort of immediate questions that arise from this fact: what were they thinking, and should this be allowed?
What They Were Thinking?
To non-millionaires it might seem absurd that people who had such a
staggering income recently would turn to the government for help after
losing their jobs. But it shouldn't. First, most wealthy people didn't
become that way by accident. They tend to be pretty savvy about money. So if the law entitles them to collect unemployment when laid off, then they aren't the type to turn down free money. Only a fool would do that.
Moreover, for many millionaires, they might see their layoff as the one time they can finally get back some of the hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars they've paid in taxes over the years. Many tax credits don't apply to them, if they're phased out for people with income above a certain threshold. They may as well cash in this once, just for principle's sake. After all, once they get back to a high paying job, they will have to revert back to paying the government a lot and getting little in return.
Should This Be Allowed?
Unemployment benefits are actually a type of insurance. And just like other kinds of insurance, it is paid out regardless of how much money you make. In this case, however, it's important to remember that the insurance payments to households that had a high-income are not directly proportional to their previous compensation. Most states have a very low unemployment payment ceiling. In New York State, for example, anyone making more than around $42,000 is paid a maximum of $405 per week — which would add up to an income rate of just $21,060 per year.
So those who enjoyed an ultra-high income can't benefit more from
unemployment payments than middle or lower-class Americans. As the Bloomberg article says, these millionaires only took in $5.2 million in unemployment payments in 2008, out of the $43.7 billion total. That's just 0.012%.
The government could certainly pass a law that disqualifies anyone who made more than a certain income during the year from collecting unemployment. And in this case it would have saved the government about $5 million. That's something, but this is a pretty tiny amount of money in the grand scheme of government budgets. A handful of millionaires who are enjoying what's likely a short stint of receiving government assistance hardly characterizes a serious problem so vital to the nation that it should be at the top of Congress' priorities.
by Daniel Indiviglio
Tuesday, October 5, 2010
provided by
atlantic_logo.gif
If you were making $1 million per year or more, but lost your job, would you file an unemployment claim? Nearly 3,000 American millionaires would have answered "yes" to this question in 2008, according to an article by Ryan J. Donmoyer at Bloomberg. IRS data shows that a whopping 2,840 households earning at least $1 million in 2008 also filed for government unemployment payments that year. There are two sort of immediate questions that arise from this fact: what were they thinking, and should this be allowed?
What They Were Thinking?
To non-millionaires it might seem absurd that people who had such a
staggering income recently would turn to the government for help after
losing their jobs. But it shouldn't. First, most wealthy people didn't
become that way by accident. They tend to be pretty savvy about money. So if the law entitles them to collect unemployment when laid off, then they aren't the type to turn down free money. Only a fool would do that.
Moreover, for many millionaires, they might see their layoff as the one time they can finally get back some of the hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars they've paid in taxes over the years. Many tax credits don't apply to them, if they're phased out for people with income above a certain threshold. They may as well cash in this once, just for principle's sake. After all, once they get back to a high paying job, they will have to revert back to paying the government a lot and getting little in return.
Should This Be Allowed?
Unemployment benefits are actually a type of insurance. And just like other kinds of insurance, it is paid out regardless of how much money you make. In this case, however, it's important to remember that the insurance payments to households that had a high-income are not directly proportional to their previous compensation. Most states have a very low unemployment payment ceiling. In New York State, for example, anyone making more than around $42,000 is paid a maximum of $405 per week — which would add up to an income rate of just $21,060 per year.
So those who enjoyed an ultra-high income can't benefit more from
unemployment payments than middle or lower-class Americans. As the Bloomberg article says, these millionaires only took in $5.2 million in unemployment payments in 2008, out of the $43.7 billion total. That's just 0.012%.
The government could certainly pass a law that disqualifies anyone who made more than a certain income during the year from collecting unemployment. And in this case it would have saved the government about $5 million. That's something, but this is a pretty tiny amount of money in the grand scheme of government budgets. A handful of millionaires who are enjoying what's likely a short stint of receiving government assistance hardly characterizes a serious problem so vital to the nation that it should be at the top of Congress' priorities.
p*e
3 楼
【 以下文字转载自 JobHunting 讨论区 】
发信人: Propro (diablo), 信区: JobHunting
标 题: 这个该算是成了吧？还要写Thank you letter吗？
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Aug 11 14:45:00 2015, 美东)
面完了一家，主面哥们儿直接给上级领导写信也CC了我，内容如下：
“XXX， I absolutely love this guy!! I want him to work with us. What
is the next step?"
这算不算是成了？另外，这种情况咋写 Thank you letter啊。
谢谢了先！
发信人: Propro (diablo), 信区: JobHunting
标 题: 这个该算是成了吧？还要写Thank you letter吗？
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Aug 11 14:45:00 2015, 美东)
面完了一家，主面哥们儿直接给上级领导写信也CC了我，内容如下：
“XXX， I absolutely love this guy!! I want him to work with us. What
is the next step?"
这算不算是成了？另外，这种情况咋写 Thank you letter啊。
谢谢了先！
F*0
4 楼
看从哪吧，从大陆来要求还是挺高的
【在 g*******u 的大作中提到】
: 据我了解
【在 g*******u 的大作中提到】
: 据我了解
y*t
5 楼
should someone, who happened to be a millionair, collect money from
insurance company if his car gets crashed?
you file an unemployment claim? Nearly 3,000 American millionaires would
have answered "yes" to this question in 2008, according to an article by
Ryan J. Donmoyer at Bloomberg. IRS data shows that a whopping 2,840
households earning at least $1 million in 2008 also filed for government
unemployment payments that year. There are two sort of immediate questions
that arise from this fact: what were they thinking, and should t: his be
allowed?
【在 d*2 的大作中提到】
: http://finance.yahoo.com/career-work/article/110930/millionaires-collecting-unemployment?mod=career-worklife_balance
: by Daniel Indiviglio
: Tuesday, October 5, 2010
: provided by
: atlantic_logo.gif
: If you were making $1 million per year or more, but lost your job, would you file an unemployment claim? Nearly 3,000 American millionaires would have answered "yes" to this question in 2008, according to an article by Ryan J. Donmoyer at Bloomberg. IRS data shows that a whopping 2,840 households earning at least $1 million in 2008 also filed for government unemployment payments that year. There are two sort of immediate questions that arise from this fact: what were they thinking, and should this be allowed?
: What They Were Thinking?
: To non-millionaires it might seem absurd that people who had such a
: staggering income recently would turn to the government for help after
: losing their jobs. But it shouldn't. First, most wealthy people didn't
insurance company if his car gets crashed?
you file an unemployment claim? Nearly 3,000 American millionaires would
have answered "yes" to this question in 2008, according to an article by
Ryan J. Donmoyer at Bloomberg. IRS data shows that a whopping 2,840
households earning at least $1 million in 2008 also filed for government
unemployment payments that year. There are two sort of immediate questions
that arise from this fact: what were they thinking, and should t: his be
allowed?
【在 d*2 的大作中提到】
: http://finance.yahoo.com/career-work/article/110930/millionaires-collecting-unemployment?mod=career-worklife_balance
: by Daniel Indiviglio
: Tuesday, October 5, 2010
: provided by
: atlantic_logo.gif
: If you were making $1 million per year or more, but lost your job, would you file an unemployment claim? Nearly 3,000 American millionaires would have answered "yes" to this question in 2008, according to an article by Ryan J. Donmoyer at Bloomberg. IRS data shows that a whopping 2,840 households earning at least $1 million in 2008 also filed for government unemployment payments that year. There are two sort of immediate questions that arise from this fact: what were they thinking, and should this be allowed?
: What They Were Thinking?
: To non-millionaires it might seem absurd that people who had such a
: staggering income recently would turn to the government for help after
: losing their jobs. But it shouldn't. First, most wealthy people didn't
N*m
6 楼
肯定成了
【在 p*e 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 JobHunting 讨论区 】
: 发信人: Propro (diablo), 信区: JobHunting
: 标 题: 这个该算是成了吧？还要写Thank you letter吗？
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Aug 11 14:45:00 2015, 美东)
: 面完了一家，主面哥们儿直接给上级领导写信也CC了我，内容如下：
: “XXX， I absolutely love this guy!! I want him to work with us. What
: is the next step?"
: 这算不算是成了？另外，这种情况咋写 Thank you letter啊。
: 谢谢了先！
【在 p*e 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 JobHunting 讨论区 】
: 发信人: Propro (diablo), 信区: JobHunting
: 标 题: 这个该算是成了吧？还要写Thank you letter吗？
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Aug 11 14:45:00 2015, 美东)
: 面完了一家，主面哥们儿直接给上级领导写信也CC了我，内容如下：
: “XXX， I absolutely love this guy!! I want him to work with us. What
: is the next step?"
: 这算不算是成了？另外，这种情况咋写 Thank you letter啊。
: 谢谢了先！
H*5
7 楼
好奇ing，还会根据地域区分对待？
: 看从哪吧，从大陆来要求还是挺高的
【在 F*********0 的大作中提到】
: 看从哪吧，从大陆来要求还是挺高的
: 看从哪吧，从大陆来要求还是挺高的
【在 F*********0 的大作中提到】
: 看从哪吧，从大陆来要求还是挺高的
m*i
8 楼
It is like "should a porn star is still entitled to sex off screen".
h*a
9 楼
"Thank you letter"模板：
Dear XXX,
Wow, what a fucking great news! I am so damn excited, motherfucker!
And thank you very much, you are such an adorable bastard!
Best fucking Regards,
XXXX
Dear XXX,
Wow, what a fucking great news! I am so damn excited, motherfucker!
And thank you very much, you are such an adorable bastard!
Best fucking Regards,
XXXX
o*g
10 楼
是的，同感。
【在 F*********0 的大作中提到】
: 看从哪吧，从大陆来要求还是挺高的
【在 F*********0 的大作中提到】
: 看从哪吧，从大陆来要求还是挺高的
m*y
11 楼
I fail to see the analogy but I still like the direction u r going. Actually
half of the gay porn actors r straight, so they
definitately r entitled to some hetero fornication if u ask me.
【在 m*******i 的大作中提到】
: It is like "should a porn star is still entitled to sex off screen".
half of the gay porn actors r straight, so they
definitately r entitled to some hetero fornication if u ask me.
【在 m*******i 的大作中提到】
: It is like "should a porn star is still entitled to sex off screen".
R*R
12 楼
不行，你这封信明显露怯了，英文太差，怎么能和阿三较量？语法错误，news是不可数
名词，fxxking是形容词，不能用来形容great。如果fxxking是用来形容news的，那么
应该在fxxking和great之间加个逗号。所以应该是：
what a piece of fxxking，great news！
或者是；
what a piece of fxxkingly great news！
【在 h***a 的大作中提到】
: "Thank you letter"模板：
: Dear XXX,
: Wow, what a fucking great news! I am so damn excited, motherfucker!
: And thank you very much, you are such an adorable bastard!
: Best fucking Regards,
: XXXX
名词，fxxking是形容词，不能用来形容great。如果fxxking是用来形容news的，那么
应该在fxxking和great之间加个逗号。所以应该是：
what a piece of fxxking，great news！
或者是；
what a piece of fxxkingly great news！
【在 h***a 的大作中提到】
: "Thank you letter"模板：
: Dear XXX,
: Wow, what a fucking great news! I am so damn excited, motherfucker!
: And thank you very much, you are such an adorable bastard!
: Best fucking Regards,
: XXXX
u*u
13 楼
符合能干活的还是国女多，
但是有不能都找国女，
相对要求高点
但是有不能都找国女，
相对要求高点
l*y
14 楼
i do not think this is good analogy even though it appears funny.
a more close analogy is: should a porn star use nipple covers off screen?
she is entitled to but kind of redundant...
【在 m*******i 的大作中提到】
: It is like "should a porn star is still entitled to sex off screen".
a more close analogy is: should a porn star use nipple covers off screen?
she is entitled to but kind of redundant...
【在 m*******i 的大作中提到】
: It is like "should a porn star is still entitled to sex off screen".
l*3
15 楼
<60%成了
D*0
16 楼
不知道白人和印度人找起工作来是什么感觉。
R*R
17 楼
我搞错了，其实可以说fxxking awesome，所以fxxking看来是可以作副词用的。
z*n
18 楼
我以为这不是秘密？
国内面试google比美国难（不少），人多bar高，据说想留在国内Google比来美国还难
，没坑。
女的面试比男的bar低，基本男的刚刚能进亚麻微软的实力，变成女的就是可以进G。当
然我也见过很多女的本身就是G+的实力（以前上算法课被某女同学秒杀过，哎），看她
们状态，基本处于找不到值得跳的公司的状态。
【在 g*******u 的大作中提到】
: 据我了解
b*e
19 楼
fucking可以当任何词用 跟N word一样
【在 R*R 的大作中提到】
: 我搞错了，其实可以说fxxking awesome，所以fxxking看来是可以作副词用的。
【在 R*R 的大作中提到】
: 我搞错了，其实可以说fxxking awesome，所以fxxking看来是可以作副词用的。
f*n
20 楼
简历改个名字， 即可 。
【在 D**********0 的大作中提到】
: 不知道白人和印度人找起工作来是什么感觉。
【在 D**********0 的大作中提到】
: 不知道白人和印度人找起工作来是什么感觉。
p*e
21 楼
扩展为一道选择题
fukingly awesome
fuking awesomeness
【在 R*R 的大作中提到】
: 我搞错了，其实可以说fxxking awesome，所以fxxking看来是可以作副词用的。
fukingly awesome
fuking awesomeness
【在 R*R 的大作中提到】
: 我搞错了，其实可以说fxxking awesome，所以fxxking看来是可以作副词用的。
u*u
22 楼
感觉女生比较两级分化，一部分娇滴滴的什么都不会，在学校是男票搞定作业的
一部分算法搞得好，ml学的好，人仔细，工作认真，脾气不错
【在 z*********n 的大作中提到】
:
: 我以为这不是秘密？
: 国内面试google比美国难（不少），人多bar高，据说想留在国内Google比来美国还难
: ，没坑。
: 女的面试比男的bar低，基本男的刚刚能进亚麻微软的实力，变成女的就是可以进G。当
: 然我也见过很多女的本身就是G+的实力（以前上算法课被某女同学秒杀过，哎），看她
: 们状态，基本处于找不到值得跳的公司的状态。
一部分算法搞得好，ml学的好，人仔细，工作认真，脾气不错
【在 z*********n 的大作中提到】
:
: 我以为这不是秘密？
: 国内面试google比美国难（不少），人多bar高，据说想留在国内Google比来美国还难
: ，没坑。
: 女的面试比男的bar低，基本男的刚刚能进亚麻微软的实力，变成女的就是可以进G。当
: 然我也见过很多女的本身就是G+的实力（以前上算法课被某女同学秒杀过，哎），看她
: 们状态，基本处于找不到值得跳的公司的状态。
l*t
23 楼
fucking既然如你所说是形容词
直接说 wow, that's fucking! 不得了？
【在 R*R 的大作中提到】
: 不行，你这封信明显露怯了，英文太差，怎么能和阿三较量？语法错误，news是不可数
: 名词，fxxking是形容词，不能用来形容great。如果fxxking是用来形容news的，那么
: 应该在fxxking和great之间加个逗号。所以应该是：
: what a piece of fxxking，great news！
: 或者是；
: what a piece of fxxkingly great news！
直接说 wow, that's fucking! 不得了？
【在 R*R 的大作中提到】
: 不行，你这封信明显露怯了，英文太差，怎么能和阿三较量？语法错误，news是不可数
: 名词，fxxking是形容词，不能用来形容great。如果fxxking是用来形容news的，那么
: 应该在fxxking和great之间加个逗号。所以应该是：
: what a piece of fxxking，great news！
: 或者是；
: what a piece of fxxkingly great news！
u*u
24 楼
就叫 Jason Patel Smith
【在 f*****n 的大作中提到】
: 简历改个名字， 即可 。
【在 f*****n 的大作中提到】
: 简历改个名字， 即可 。
R*R
25 楼
that guy is a fxxking moron.
你觉得不可以吗？
说过了，形容词，副词都可以。其实fxxking啥都不算，纯粹语气助词都可以。
【在 l****t 的大作中提到】
: fucking既然如你所说是形容词
: 直接说 wow, that's fucking! 不得了？
你觉得不可以吗？
说过了，形容词，副词都可以。其实fxxking啥都不算，纯粹语气助词都可以。
【在 l****t 的大作中提到】
: fucking既然如你所说是形容词
: 直接说 wow, that's fucking! 不得了？
H*5
26 楼
nod这个。以前听说附近部门某资深女码农3年写了40万行的代码加调试。
: 感觉女生比较两级分化，一部分娇滴滴的什么都不会，在学校是男票搞定作业的
: 一部分算法搞得好，ml学的好，人仔细，工作认真，脾气不错
【在 u**u 的大作中提到】
: 就叫 Jason Patel Smith
: 感觉女生比较两级分化，一部分娇滴滴的什么都不会，在学校是男票搞定作业的
: 一部分算法搞得好，ml学的好，人仔细，工作认真，脾气不错
【在 u**u 的大作中提到】
: 就叫 Jason Patel Smith
i*a
27 楼
楼主男的女的？
面试官男的女的？ 一来就love, 告他们sexual harassment发个财
[发表自未名空间手机版 - m.mitbbs.com]
面试官男的女的？ 一来就love, 告他们sexual harassment发个财
[发表自未名空间手机版 - m.mitbbs.com]
m*o
28 楼
我一女同学进了google的某个program培训一年再上岗，貌似男的就没这么好的事
x*o
29 楼
楼上的，fucklingly，这尼玛比原贴搞笑n倍，版主码了吧
u*u
30 楼
哈，
现在不行了啊
【在 m******o 的大作中提到】
: 我一女同学进了google的某个program培训一年再上岗，貌似男的就没这么好的事
现在不行了啊
【在 m******o 的大作中提到】
: 我一女同学进了google的某个program培训一年再上岗，貌似男的就没这么好的事
j*l
31 楼
终于有人出来陪我瞻仰fuckingly了，可找到组织了，大哥您也53俱的吧？
【在 x****o 的大作中提到】
: 楼上的，fucklingly，这尼玛比原贴搞笑n倍，版主码了吧
【在 x****o 的大作中提到】
: 楼上的，fucklingly，这尼玛比原贴搞笑n倍，版主码了吧
i*9
32 楼
只是亚裔活或白人男的不行。
：我一女同学进了google的某个program培训一年再上岗，貌似男的就没这么好的事
：我一女同学进了google的某个program培训一年再上岗，貌似男的就没这么好的事
m*o
33 楼
怎么不行，今年年初在所谓狗家大量取消ONSITE并且拿到OFFER也match不到组的情况下
我同学就进了啊
【在 u**u 的大作中提到】
: 哈，
: 现在不行了啊
我同学就进了啊
【在 u**u 的大作中提到】
: 哈，
: 现在不行了啊
r*s
34 楼
国内gg一致认为从这边回去的t5没有国内的t5好用
t6差不多
更核心的人员北美碾压国内。
: 我以为这不是秘密？
: 国内面试google比美国难（不少），人多bar高，据说想留在国内Google比来美
国还难
: ，没坑。
: 女的面试比男的bar低，基本男的刚刚能进亚麻微软的实力，变成女的就是可以
进G。当
: 然我也见过很多女的本身就是G 的实力（以前上算法课被某女同学秒杀过，哎）
，看她
: 们状态，基本处于找不到值得跳的公司的状态。
【在 z*********n 的大作中提到】
:
: 我以为这不是秘密？
: 国内面试google比美国难（不少），人多bar高，据说想留在国内Google比来美国还难
: ，没坑。
: 女的面试比男的bar低，基本男的刚刚能进亚麻微软的实力，变成女的就是可以进G。当
: 然我也见过很多女的本身就是G+的实力（以前上算法课被某女同学秒杀过，哎），看她
: 们状态，基本处于找不到值得跳的公司的状态。
t6差不多
更核心的人员北美碾压国内。
: 我以为这不是秘密？
: 国内面试google比美国难（不少），人多bar高，据说想留在国内Google比来美
国还难
: ，没坑。
: 女的面试比男的bar低，基本男的刚刚能进亚麻微软的实力，变成女的就是可以
进G。当
: 然我也见过很多女的本身就是G 的实力（以前上算法课被某女同学秒杀过，哎）
，看她
: 们状态，基本处于找不到值得跳的公司的状态。
【在 z*********n 的大作中提到】
:
: 我以为这不是秘密？
: 国内面试google比美国难（不少），人多bar高，据说想留在国内Google比来美国还难
: ，没坑。
: 女的面试比男的bar低，基本男的刚刚能进亚麻微软的实力，变成女的就是可以进G。当
: 然我也见过很多女的本身就是G+的实力（以前上算法课被某女同学秒杀过，哎），看她
: 们状态，基本处于找不到值得跳的公司的状态。
y*u
35 楼
不能变性就只能做好XOJ了
【在 g*******u 的大作中提到】
: 据我了解
【在 g*******u 的大作中提到】
: 据我了解
f*n
36 楼
任何一家公司，都不会指望挑大梁的是女人。
u*n
37 楼
Yahoo
【在 f*****n 的大作中提到】
: 任何一家公司，都不会指望挑大梁的是女人。
【在 f*****n 的大作中提到】
: 任何一家公司，都不会指望挑大梁的是女人。
D*0
38 楼
咱们的女生比男生混的开多了。
【在 f*****n 的大作中提到】
: 任何一家公司，都不会指望挑大梁的是女人。
【在 f*****n 的大作中提到】
: 任何一家公司，都不会指望挑大梁的是女人。
y*u
39 楼
完蛋了，不过食堂还是好
【在 u***n 的大作中提到】
: Yahoo
【在 u***n 的大作中提到】
: Yahoo
z*o
40 楼
索南可以identify自己是女性,
和你老婆是同性恋结婚.
和你老婆是同性恋结婚.
z*o
41 楼
至少省你1000道poj,
不谢.
【在 z*******o 的大作中提到】
: 索南可以identify自己是女性,
: 和你老婆是同性恋结婚.
不谢.
【在 z*******o 的大作中提到】
: 索南可以identify自己是女性,
: 和你老婆是同性恋结婚.
y*u
42 楼
赞啊👍，再claim自己有mental disability，又省500道
【在 z*******o 的大作中提到】
: 至少省你1000道poj,
: 不谢.
【在 z*******o 的大作中提到】
: 至少省你1000道poj,
: 不谢.
s*r
43 楼
俺准备在review里面写为了公司的多样化，如何帮助女员工成长的事迹，肯定比做几个
feature有意义多了
【在 y**********u 的大作中提到】
: 赞啊👍，再claim自己有mental disability，又省500道
feature有意义多了
【在 y**********u 的大作中提到】
: 赞啊👍，再claim自己有mental disability，又省500道
y*u
44 楼
对，老板如果不care就搞死他
【在 s*****r 的大作中提到】
: 俺准备在review里面写为了公司的多样化，如何帮助女员工成长的事迹，肯定比做几个
: feature有意义多了
【在 s*****r 的大作中提到】
: 俺准备在review里面写为了公司的多样化，如何帮助女员工成长的事迹，肯定比做几个
: feature有意义多了
p*2
45 楼
不是男半年，女半月吗？
【在 g*******u 的大作中提到】
: 据我了解
u*n
46 楼
完蛋不完蛋和是不是女强人没有关系
【在 y**********u 的大作中提到】
: 完蛋了，不过食堂还是好
【在 y**********u 的大作中提到】
: 完蛋了，不过食堂还是好
l*u
47 楼
中国女人进谷歌也很不容易的。
: 完蛋不完蛋和是不是女强人没有关系
【在 u***n 的大作中提到】
: 完蛋不完蛋和是不是女强人没有关系
: 完蛋不完蛋和是不是女强人没有关系
【在 u***n 的大作中提到】
: 完蛋不完蛋和是不是女强人没有关系
s*r
48 楼
看咋比了，和中国男人比，不是一个量级
【在 l*******u 的大作中提到】
: 中国女人进谷歌也很不容易的。
:
:
: 完蛋不完蛋和是不是女强人没有关系
:
【在 l*******u 的大作中提到】
: 中国女人进谷歌也很不容易的。
:
:
: 完蛋不完蛋和是不是女强人没有关系
:
f*n
49 楼
混成那个样。。。
【在 u***n 的大作中提到】
: Yahoo
【在 u***n 的大作中提到】
: Yahoo
f*n
50 楼
混得开，不代表实力强。
【在 D**********0 的大作中提到】
: 咱们的女生比男生混的开多了。
【在 D**********0 的大作中提到】
: 咱们的女生比男生混的开多了。
u*n
51 楼
我只想说一句，我是很尊重这里的姐们的，真的，发自肺腑的
u*u
52 楼
国女找工也是相对国男容易，还不如白男好找，，，，
u*p
53 楼
和印度人比，国男国女都只有被碾压的份
u*u
54 楼
是啊，看见版上妹子还不是在苦苦找工。
都不容易
【在 u****p 的大作中提到】
: 和印度人比，国男国女都只有被碾压的份
都不容易
【在 u****p 的大作中提到】
: 和印度人比，国男国女都只有被碾压的份
相关阅读
传说中的好人卡谁给出个主意学校食堂惊现早茶哥罗志祥传雨鞋国足出线再次告急, 淋病新毒无药可医 (转载)三张不同角度的照片做成的GIF图片就会出现神奇的效果！毛主席不是太残暴，而是太仁慈(zt)尊严.军营里的fcwr某网友总结的各种日语神翻译(ZT)有人落水！肚皮笑疼了 宁波将斥资5000万培养1400名乔布斯 (转载)求Windows 7 Professional 序列号 (转载)女子开宝马倒车撞上他人宝马车 贴字条道歉(图) (转载)法律问题求助：关于deposit (转载)最近食欲不是很好，吃一碗饭就撑了。。。。好有型的麻将台啊！Things Aren't Always What They Seem小时候有一次去贵州狄公断案也有了新工具