http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t1/Basketball/33077117_0_3.html 在谈到勒布朗走步的问题,utneo将之比喻为thief: 发信人: utneo (utneo), 信区: Basketball 标 题: Re: 看到动不动攻击勒布朗走步 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Aug 18 17:25:21 2015, 美东) I fule u. Following your logic, a thief is very innocent. If the thief got caught by police, then you should not complain. If the thief did not get caught, then you should blame the police, not the thief! 然后当被问及其他球员走步是不是thief,utneo声称其他队员只是失误。失误和犯罪的 区别是如果失误严重和次数比别人多就成了犯罪,因为勒布朗走步最多所以就构成犯罪: 发信人: utneo (utneo), 信区: Basketball 标 题: Re: 看到动不动攻击勒布朗走步 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Aug 23 11:37:34 2015, 美东) You just demonstrated you have no logic. I only said LBJ is like a thief. I never said others are. Everybody makes mistake, but what differentiates a criminal and a good person who had made mistakes is how big the mistake was and how often it had been made. Go fix your mental problem, man. 最后utneo下结论说偷钱一次不算犯罪(只能算失误),只有偷钱1000次的才会被判罪 。而勒布朗就是这个偷钱1000次的。其他球员的次数都没达到犯罪标准。 发信人: utneo (utneo), 信区: Basketball 标 题: Re: 看到动不动攻击勒布朗走步 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Aug 23 16:15:37 2015, 美东) One stealing $20 once is not a criminal, but one stealing $20 one thousand, times will be convicted. You stupid joker.