三只小猪和狼，最后，狼自杀了(转载)# Joke - 肚皮舞运动
w*n
1 楼
我的背景是，paper 12， 1 book, citation ~100, 专业是bioinformatics。 最近被
RFE万念俱灰，等着绿卡留在美国，是在是很焦急。
我现在也收到了140ref的notice细节，IO是TSC的XM1102.
我看过后不太理解大概意思是被ref的内容是contribution(具体内容见如下图片，还在
网上发现有人贴出跟这个一模一样的出自XM1102的质疑Contribution的内容)
http://www.wisewillwin.blogspot.com/2015/06/detail-rfe-notice.h
但是notice里面也有一些诡异的内容：
质疑我continue to work in this field（但是我的确已经提交过employment
verification
letter）。原文是 Documentation to establish that the beneficiary will
continue to work in their claimed area of expertise. The petition does
not indicate that the beneficiary has prearranged commitments for
working in this field.
更奇怪的是 Documentation to establish that the beneficiary's entry will
substantially benefit prospectively the United States. The petition does
not indicate that the beneficiary's entry will substantially benefit
prospectively the United States. 要求提供 Letter from Current or Prospective
employers, or individual who work in the beneficiary's field.
但是我目前在美国top5的大学做薄厚，交了Employment Verification Letter 同时也
有老板很强的推荐信，同时也有同一个系里面没有合作过的教授的推荐信都已经在材料
里面提交过，还怎么质疑呢？想不通啊。
然后提到了2步法，但是没有提第二部的评价是不是因为我连第一步都没过，第二步
totality就自然没看呢？
并且提到了Additionally meeting the minimum regulatory criteria outlined
above, alone will not establish eligibility for the E11 immigrant
classification. Any evidence submitted in response to the request,
should also articulate how the evidence establishes that the beneficiary
possesses the required high level of expertise for the E11 immigrant
classification.
这个是不是说我的totality不够？是所以我得证明自己的totality？
RFE万念俱灰，等着绿卡留在美国，是在是很焦急。
我现在也收到了140ref的notice细节，IO是TSC的XM1102.
我看过后不太理解大概意思是被ref的内容是contribution(具体内容见如下图片，还在
网上发现有人贴出跟这个一模一样的出自XM1102的质疑Contribution的内容)
http://www.wisewillwin.blogspot.com/2015/06/detail-rfe-notice.h
但是notice里面也有一些诡异的内容：
质疑我continue to work in this field（但是我的确已经提交过employment
verification
letter）。原文是 Documentation to establish that the beneficiary will
continue to work in their claimed area of expertise. The petition does
not indicate that the beneficiary has prearranged commitments for
working in this field.
更奇怪的是 Documentation to establish that the beneficiary's entry will
substantially benefit prospectively the United States. The petition does
not indicate that the beneficiary's entry will substantially benefit
prospectively the United States. 要求提供 Letter from Current or Prospective
employers, or individual who work in the beneficiary's field.
但是我目前在美国top5的大学做薄厚，交了Employment Verification Letter 同时也
有老板很强的推荐信，同时也有同一个系里面没有合作过的教授的推荐信都已经在材料
里面提交过，还怎么质疑呢？想不通啊。
然后提到了2步法，但是没有提第二部的评价是不是因为我连第一步都没过，第二步
totality就自然没看呢？
并且提到了Additionally meeting the minimum regulatory criteria outlined
above, alone will not establish eligibility for the E11 immigrant
classification. Any evidence submitted in response to the request,
should also articulate how the evidence establishes that the beneficiary
possesses the required high level of expertise for the E11 immigrant
classification.
这个是不是说我的totality不够？是所以我得证明自己的totality？
