Redian新闻
>
男人和女人发生关系,明显男人更吃亏
avatar
M*8
2
How To Beat Warren Buffett?
http://stockpickr.com/pro/portfolio/warren-buffett/
Here's how:
Determine the price swings of the major holdings of
Warren Buffett.
Then buy at the lows and sell at the highs of the
price swing range.
You will automatically beat Buffett by doing so.
avatar
a*a
3
在世俗的眼里两性关系中一直都是女性处于弱势,一般也只有女性要求男人负责任,
很少男人求着女人负责的对吧,但如果你现在还是这种思想那你就太落后了,现在社会
不是讲究男女平等吗?别的方面我没发现,在两性问题上倒是越来越平衡了。
不说古代社会女性一生只能有一个男人了,就七八十年代的时候,我们的长辈们也还
是“规规矩矩”的恋爱结婚生子,牵手都害羞的年代,婚前发生关系是几乎不可能的,
当然不包括“先进”男女,但是如今,只能说年轻人的思想真是越来越开放了,以前总
说男人风流,现在女人也一样,“先进”女性们一点都不把一夜情放在心上,更没有“
发生关系你就得对我负责”这种思想,那面对这些女人,当然是男人更吃亏了,约的时
候,吃饭就不算了,男人总得订房间吧,得买“设施”吧,还得付出体力,要说爽的是
女性才对,爽完拍拍屁股走人,男人们还得去柜台结账,这什么年头啊,明显就是男人
吃亏。
前不久有个新闻,一个小偷入室抢劫被女主人撞见,被女主人制服后强迫与其发生关
系,随后小偷因感到受到侮辱投案自首并报案,看看,现在部分女性如狼似虎啊,真是
找逼容易躲逼难啊。
avatar
s*y
4
what a joke!

【在 M*****8 的大作中提到】
: How To Beat Warren Buffett?
: http://stockpickr.com/pro/portfolio/warren-buffett/
: Here's how:
: Determine the price swings of the major holdings of
: Warren Buffett.
: Then buy at the lows and sell at the highs of the
: price swing range.
: You will automatically beat Buffett by doing so.

avatar
n*e
5
你是不是天天在地下室意淫?
avatar
M*8
6

.....................
WHY?

【在 s********y 的大作中提到】
: what a joke!
avatar
s*n
7
有的早就没了廉耻之心,网上认识了就三更半夜冲陌生男人家里,你说她这是是去干嘛
?不打自招嘛。男人有几个挡的住免费炮的?就这么被她干了,然后这bitch提上裤子
就像什么都没发生一样滑脚了,头一天我哥们刚刚炫耀他干了麻烦炮,第二天听说炮友
准备结婚了。我靠所有人都震精了

【在 n******e 的大作中提到】
: 你是不是天天在地下室意淫?
avatar
M*8
8
E.g. KO is WF's biggest holding:
Here's last Friday's forecast on KO:
So you buy near $67, the low of the day and then
sell at the next upside target, and REPEAT.
Much better than just buy and hold, WB's way.
This strategy replies on WF's FA and stock picking.
If his FA fails, you'll lose money, but you'll still
beat him.
*** NOTE: ALL PRICE TARGETS & PROFITS ARE APPROXIMATE ***
(Cash Unit is $1,000. Simply multiply for larger sums.)
FORECAST FOR STOCK SYMBOL: KO, AS OF 20111104 (YYYYMMDD)
[AFTER HOURS] CLOSING PRICE ON 20111104 was: 67.6000
NEAR-TERM STOCK OUTLOOK & RATING FOR KO: ESSENTIALLY NEUTRAL
Near-Term Price Potential is DOWN, i.e. -0.2169 (-0.30%)
Near-Term Price Target: 67.3831
At 67.3831, profit per $1,000 investment is 3.2086 (+0.32%)
Close out at least half of short position at or near 67.3831
There is a small probability of price reaching 65.0312
If so, your gain per $1,000 investment is 38.0000 (+3.80%)
Close out all your short position at or near 65.0312
============================================
TRADING DETAILS & PROFIT ESTIMATES: (NON-LEVERAGED, CASH BASIS)
A $1,000 worth of KO sold short at current price of 67.6000
means you would have sold short approximately 14.7929 shares.
At 67.3831, profit per $1,000 investment is: 3.2086 (+0.32%)
In case of short squeeze, expect price to peak at about 69.3576
Sell short $2,000 more at: 69.3576 will break even at: 68.7617
At 67.6000, profit is 50.6823 on $3,000 investment. (+1.69%)
At 67.3831, profit is 60.1454 on $3,000 investment. (+2.00%)
At 65.0312, profit is 162.7563 on $3,000 investment. (+5.43%)
avatar
y*1
9
现在男人最好自己多留点心眼,出钱出力到后来不一定还落了个性侵,强奸的罪名,便
宜莫贪。
avatar
M*8
10
In fact you can use this method to outperform any famous
fund that is FA-based, and ride on the latter's glory.
While doing so, your effort is only a fraction of what
the fund expends on its FA research. Your cost for out-
performance is a tiny fraction of the fund's overhead.
avatar
C*8
11
同意楼主的观点。
avatar
s*y
12
Obviously u have no idea how Buffett makes his money.
Regardless it is impossible for u to time the lows and highs of the stocks.
How would you compensate for the dividend and short term tax penalty?

【在 M*****8 的大作中提到】
: E.g. KO is WF's biggest holding:
: Here's last Friday's forecast on KO:
: So you buy near $67, the low of the day and then
: sell at the next upside target, and REPEAT.
: Much better than just buy and hold, WB's way.
: This strategy replies on WF's FA and stock picking.
: If his FA fails, you'll lose money, but you'll still
: beat him.
: *** NOTE: ALL PRICE TARGETS & PROFITS ARE APPROXIMATE ***
: (Cash Unit is $1,000. Simply multiply for larger sums.)

avatar
M*8
13

.
You can't obviously. But others can.
Base the fund in any tax-haven country.

【在 s********y 的大作中提到】
: Obviously u have no idea how Buffett makes his money.
: Regardless it is impossible for u to time the lows and highs of the stocks.
: How would you compensate for the dividend and short term tax penalty?

avatar
s*y
14
yeah right. Can you? And does that tax shelter country give you dividend?

【在 M*****8 的大作中提到】
:
: .
: You can't obviously. But others can.
: Base the fund in any tax-haven country.

avatar
k*n
15
He will report to Carl MX much sooner than us
We all beat him
avatar
s*n
16
人巴肥做的就是insider trading, 你怎么跟人比

【在 M*****8 的大作中提到】
: How To Beat Warren Buffett?
: http://stockpickr.com/pro/portfolio/warren-buffett/
: Here's how:
: Determine the price swings of the major holdings of
: Warren Buffett.
: Then buy at the lows and sell at the highs of the
: price swing range.
: You will automatically beat Buffett by doing so.

avatar
M*8
17

.......................
Look, there is no money in disabusing fools,
when it comes to trading. No point in wasting time.
So, believe what you like. I couldn' care less.
P.S. Dividends are paid by company, not country.

【在 s********y 的大作中提到】
: yeah right. Can you? And does that tax shelter country give you dividend?
avatar
s*y
18
lol, are you serious? I was mocking you about where your dividend is gonna
come from. And you were trying to correct me?
Many of Buffett's stocks trade within ranges for decades. Price fluctuation
is just his rounding error. Basically you are throwing away the "value"
part and going purely for the speculation part. And some how you think you
gonna beat Buffett by trading?
Some people are just clueless and even funny.

【在 M*****8 的大作中提到】
:
: .......................
: Look, there is no money in disabusing fools,
: when it comes to trading. No point in wasting time.
: So, believe what you like. I couldn' care less.
: P.S. Dividends are paid by company, not country.

avatar
M*8
19

fluctuation
you
...................................
I'll let you have the last word and make you happy.
No point for me to spend time arguing as I seek no converts.
I DO welcome dissent and opposite view. We all need that,
at least for liquidity.

【在 s********y 的大作中提到】
: lol, are you serious? I was mocking you about where your dividend is gonna
: come from. And you were trying to correct me?
: Many of Buffett's stocks trade within ranges for decades. Price fluctuation
: is just his rounding error. Basically you are throwing away the "value"
: part and going purely for the speculation part. And some how you think you
: gonna beat Buffett by trading?
: Some people are just clueless and even funny.

相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。