Redian新闻
>
劈柴被迫向国会解释,为什么搜索idiot
avatar
劈柴被迫向国会解释,为什么搜索idiot# Joke - 肚皮舞运动
n*4
1
会冒出川普的像片
In a House Judiciary Committee hearing today, Google CEO Sundar Pichai was
asked to explain why a Google image search for “idiot” turned up pictures
of Donald Trump — and whether that was a case of intentional bias.
The question came from Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), who was trying to refute the
idea that Google is politically manipulating search results. “Right now,
if you google the word ‘idiot’ under images, a picture of Donald Trump
comes up. I just did that,” she said. “How would that happen?”
Pichai offered a long, general explanation of how Google search works:
Any time you type in a keyword, as Google we have gone out and crawled and
stored copies of billions of [websites’] pages in our index. And we take
the keyword and match it against their pages and rank them based on over 200
signals — things like relevance, freshness, popularity, how other people
are using it. And based on that, at any given time, we try to rank and find
the best search results for that query. And then we evaluate them with
external raters, and they evaluate it to objective guidelines. And that’s
how we make sure the process is working.
“So it’s not some little man sitting behind the curtain figuring out what
we’re going to show the user?” Lofgren asked sarcastically.
“This is working at scale, and we don’t manually intervene on any
particular search result,” replied Pichai.
News outlets reported on the Trump “idiot” results earlier this year. If
you search the term now, in fact, you’ll mostly get pictures from stories
explaining why it happened. It appeared to be the result of outside parties
gaming Google’s search results, a well-known tactic known as “Google
bombing.”
Trump isn’t the first president to get Google-bombed: in the mid-2000s,
searches for “miserable failure” famously returned results about President
George W. Bush. It can be a politicized (or just funny) extension of normal
search engine optimization tactics. In this case, it’s convincing Google
that a Trump picture is what most people want when they search for “idiot,
” by upvoting or linking to posts with that combination of words and images.
Results from a recent image search for “idiot.”
Lofgren’s question came after a long, factually sketchy grilling from Rep.
Lamar Smith (R-TX), who claimed to have “irrefutable” evidence of Google
suppressing conservative search results. That included an actual research
project from Google critic Robert Epstein, author of a controversial study
about whether Google results are politically slanted. But he also repeatedly
cited a blog post from conservative site PJ Media, which the writer
explicitly described as “not scientific.” (It’s also the post that got
President Donald Trump tweeting about Google’s “rigged” search results.)
Pichai’s answer probably won’t really alter the debate over whether Google
is biased, but it officially puts an internet stunt into the congressional
record.
avatar
g*q
2
狗这个算法肯定是比较 idiot的,不然也不会一搜国内的事情跳出来全是轮子了
avatar
D*s
3
youtube搜索什么科学术语首页都是一大堆印度人的解释或者讲座。google应该是有
manually manipulation

【在 g*q 的大作中提到】
: 狗这个算法肯定是比较 idiot的,不然也不会一搜国内的事情跳出来全是轮子了
avatar
n*d
4
如过不去人工干预,很容易被利用。当然也无许是故意视而不见

【在 g*q 的大作中提到】
: 狗这个算法肯定是比较 idiot的,不然也不会一搜国内的事情跳出来全是轮子了
avatar
b*e
5
据说有共党份子质问劈柴哥为啥他孙女的iphone会出奇怪的东西
劈柴哥狠无辜的说那不是我们的产品
主党哄堂大笑

pictures
the

【在 n****4 的大作中提到】
: 会冒出川普的像片
: In a House Judiciary Committee hearing today, Google CEO Sundar Pichai was
: asked to explain why a Google image search for “idiot” turned up pictures
: of Donald Trump — and whether that was a case of intentional bias.
: The question came from Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), who was trying to refute the
: idea that Google is politically manipulating search results. “Right now,
: if you google the word ‘idiot’ under images, a picture of Donald Trump
: comes up. I just did that,” she said. “How would that happen?”
: Pichai offered a long, general explanation of how Google search works:
: Any time you type in a keyword, as Google we have gone out and crawled and

avatar
h*3
6
狗家算法是有点意思
我用狗狗做计算器,常常一个结果还有带图片的
avatar
p*h
7
狗家算法是好,但是一些意识形态的东西明显是手改的
川巨巨的idiot link我倒相信是误伤
只是一旦有了前科,这黄泥巴掉裤裆里,不是屎也是屎
avatar
P*A
8
没人敢问问为啥美国科学家全是黑人
avatar
h*g
9
我搜的结果也是这样。相当不爽。
最好的可能是上传视频的阿三雇人帮刷结果,就像淘宝刷单一样。

【在 D***s 的大作中提到】
: youtube搜索什么科学术语首页都是一大堆印度人的解释或者讲座。google应该是有
: manually manipulation

avatar
c*n
10
这玩意现在改了没

【在 P*A 的大作中提到】
: 没人敢问问为啥美国科学家全是黑人
avatar
c*n
11
阿三发博客文章和youtube视频教程的热情非常之足
大部分质量很差
但是偶尔我在捂着鼻子修我们内部系统的时候 能搜到某个落后技术的一个诡异之处有
阿三写了篇博文

【在 h****g 的大作中提到】
: 我搜的结果也是这样。相当不爽。
: 最好的可能是上传视频的阿三雇人帮刷结果,就像淘宝刷单一样。

avatar
y*i
12
苹果手机就不能用字母表的软件搜东西了?

【在 b*****e 的大作中提到】
: 据说有共党份子质问劈柴哥为啥他孙女的iphone会出奇怪的东西
: 劈柴哥狠无辜的说那不是我们的产品
: 主党哄堂大笑
:
: pictures
: the

avatar
H*g
13
我一直感觉quora是印度站

【在 c******n 的大作中提到】
: 阿三发博客文章和youtube视频教程的热情非常之足
: 大部分质量很差
: 但是偶尔我在捂着鼻子修我们内部系统的时候 能搜到某个落后技术的一个诡异之处有
: 阿三写了篇博文

avatar
n*4
14
三哥好为人师,远甚于老中。各门各派的人物在油布上开课的,多如牛毛

【在 c******n 的大作中提到】
: 阿三发博客文章和youtube视频教程的热情非常之足
: 大部分质量很差
: 但是偶尔我在捂着鼻子修我们内部系统的时候 能搜到某个落后技术的一个诡异之处有
: 阿三写了篇博文

avatar
y*i
15
老中可不好为人师,古人云:教会和尚,饿死尼姑,不是,古人云:教会师父,饿死徒
弟。
俗话说,要想学得会,得陪师傅睡,不是,俗话说,要想学得会,就得不怕累。

【在 n****4 的大作中提到】
: 三哥好为人师,远甚于老中。各门各派的人物在油布上开课的,多如牛毛
avatar
f*n
16
人之患在于好为人师

【在 y****i 的大作中提到】
: 老中可不好为人师,古人云:教会和尚,饿死尼姑,不是,古人云:教会师父,饿死徒
: 弟。
: 俗话说,要想学得会,得陪师傅睡,不是,俗话说,要想学得会,就得不怕累。

相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。