吃餐馆吃dinner点bottle wine喝不完应该带走吗？# Living
w*s
1 楼
EB-1A, TSC, 前一段收到RFE，需要提供以下evidence证明contributions:
（1）Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary'S
contribution to the field.
（2）Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently
consider the beneficiary's work important.
（3）Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the
beneficiary's contributions of major significance.
（4）Evidence that the beneficiary's major significant contribution(s) has
provoked widespread public commentary in the field or has been widely cited.
（5）Evidence of the beneficiary'S work being implemented by others.
应该是比较standard的rfe. 现在关于怎么回复RFE和律师有不同意见：
我倾向于针对上面5条,用evidence逐条回复来证明contributions，最后再用两三页论
证totality.
律师则倾向于不逐条回复，应该用narrative form, 觉得我上面那种回复的话很难
follow，并且很多evidence在重复利用. 我就奇怪了怎么难follow？ 我针对每一条把
evidence逐项列出，结构上应该很清晰啊。
大家都是怎么回复的？觉得哪种方式更好？多谢。
（1）Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary'S
contribution to the field.
（2）Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently
consider the beneficiary's work important.
（3）Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the
beneficiary's contributions of major significance.
（4）Evidence that the beneficiary's major significant contribution(s) has
provoked widespread public commentary in the field or has been widely cited.
（5）Evidence of the beneficiary'S work being implemented by others.
应该是比较standard的rfe. 现在关于怎么回复RFE和律师有不同意见：
我倾向于针对上面5条,用evidence逐条回复来证明contributions，最后再用两三页论
证totality.
律师则倾向于不逐条回复，应该用narrative form, 觉得我上面那种回复的话很难
follow，并且很多evidence在重复利用. 我就奇怪了怎么难follow？ 我针对每一条把
evidence逐项列出，结构上应该很清晰啊。
大家都是怎么回复的？觉得哪种方式更好？多谢。
