All Cash Offer把卖家吓的撤了单 - 未名空间MITBBS历史存档

国际科技财经博客移民网络热点娱乐民生时事公众号

Redian新闻

>未名空间

>Living

All Cash Offer把卖家吓的撤了单

All Cash Offer把卖家吓的撤了单# Living

F*F2013-03-13 07:03

1 楼

1。关于clemson university, graduate school, computer science ranking, 2010
第79名
http://grad-schools.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-graduate
2。关于女AP的publication和citation
Haiying Shen
Clemson University
Publications: 53 | Citations: 69 | G-Index: 7 | H-Index: 4
http://academic.research.microsoft.com/Author/3409322?query=Hai
3。瞻仰女AP的片片和presentation
(自己找吧)
=====
为这么一般的学校里的这么一般的人掐的那么起劲，犯的着么？

m*t2013-03-13 07:03

2 楼

听说一个short sale，有人下了个超出list price极多的一个单。吓得listing agent
马上撤单，准备加个20%再说。
房价就是这么被抬起来的。南加现在不是几个，而是很多都回到2005年高点的价位了。

D*l2013-03-13 07:03

3 楼

因为女AP还是比很多大妈混得好多了

【在 F******F 的大作中提到】

: 1。关于clemson university, graduate school, computer science ranking, 2010
: 第79名
: http://grad-schools.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-graduate
: 2。关于女AP的publication和citation
: Haiying Shen
: Clemson University
: Publications: 53 | Citations: 69 | G-Index: 7 | H-Index: 4
: http://academic.research.microsoft.com/Author/3409322?query=Hai
: 3。瞻仰女AP的片片和presentation
: (自己找吧)

p*g2013-03-13 07:03

4 楼

我不信，你给出些link吧

F*F2013-03-13 07:03

5 楼

看女AP不顺眼的好像是学校排名比较好发表文章比较多被引用更多，但是拿不到
FUNDING的WSN吧，即瞧不起女AP又羡慕嫉妒人家那么多FUNDING，那么义愤填膺。。。到处暗示女AP的成就是睡来的。
当然他恨不得自己可以睡来这么多钱...
哈哈

【在 D******l 的大作中提到】

: 因为女AP还是比很多大妈混得好多了

B*a2013-03-13 07:03

6 楼

没见人是“听说”的吗？

【在 p**********g 的大作中提到】

: 我不信，你给出些link吧

c*r2013-03-13 07:03

7 楼

最大的原因是有人出来说她和那人老公有不正当关系，否则哪有这么热烈，这个板对小
三从来没有估息纵容过。至于是真是假，只有当事人清楚了

。

【在 F******F 的大作中提到】

: 看女AP不顺眼的好像是学校排名比较好发表文章比较多被引用更多，但是拿不到
: FUNDING的WSN吧，即瞧不起女AP又羡慕嫉妒人家那么多FUNDING，那么义愤填膺。。。到处暗示女AP的成就是睡来的。
: 当然他恨不得自己可以睡来这么多钱...
: 哈哈

F*F2013-03-13 07:03

8 楼

噢，所以楼上的对大妈那么有意见。

【在 c*********r 的大作中提到】

: 最大的原因是有人出来说她和那人老公有不正当关系，否则哪有这么热烈，这个板对小
: 三从来没有估息纵容过。至于是真是假，只有当事人清楚了
:
: 。

s*t2013-03-13 07:03

9 楼

哦，我也google一把，我承认我无聊
沈教授的文章发的很好啊,hehe

F*F2013-03-13 07:03

10 楼

俺是外行哈，看不懂内容。
俺就是看
1) 有多少篇是在TOP JOURNAL上发表的，有几篇拿了奖；
2) 有多少CITATION 。

【在 s*****t 的大作中提到】

: 哦，我也google一把，我承认我无聊
: 沈教授的文章发的很好啊,hehe

Z*S2013-03-13 07:03

11 楼

The microsoft citation web site is severely outdated.
You should use google scholar instead.

【在 F******F 的大作中提到】

F*F2013-03-13 07:03

12 楼

Google Scholar doesn't have any summary by author name.
How can I add up the citations, the total number of publication,
the number of paper published on the various journal/conference, and
etc?
Microsoft citation is nicer in terms of one sentence summary.

【在 Z**S 的大作中提到】

: The microsoft citation web site is severely outdated.
: You should use google scholar instead.

Z*S2013-03-13 07:03

13 楼

But Microsoft citation is not accurate, it misses out
too many citations and leads you to wrong conclusion.
A wrong data point is worse than not having this data point.
Got it?

【在 F******F 的大作中提到】

: Google Scholar doesn't have any summary by author name.
: How can I add up the citations, the total number of publication,
: the number of paper published on the various journal/conference, and
: etc?
: Microsoft citation is nicer in terms of one sentence summary.

E*12013-03-13 07:03

14 楼

So tell us what's going on, as you said, with low rank low citing but much
more funding? YOu think this is reasonable?
I guess WSNs are not feeling jealous of her, but feeling ridiculous of your
first sentence

。到处暗示女AP的成就是睡来的。

【在 F******F 的大作中提到】

F*F2013-03-13 07:03

15 楼

1. I am not sure how you draw the conclusion that Microsoft Citation is
outdated. Can you give a couple of 女AP's papers that Google Scholar can find but Microsoft Citation cannot? Just get an idea.
2. Microsoft Citation is obvious user-friendly. If what you have suggested is true, it will be a systematic error which applies to all researchers and scholars. For the comparison purpose, it is still a fair game for all authors. In other words,assuming what you have suggested is true that Google Scholar is up-to-date, if 女AP has low citation and reward numbers in the Microsoft Scholar, she would be positioned at a similar rank in Google Scholar in comparison with others.
BTW, you should work on your logic a bit more.

【在 Z**S 的大作中提到】

: But Microsoft citation is not accurate, it misses out
: too many citations and leads you to wrong conclusion.
: A wrong data point is worse than not having this data point.
: Got it?

j*b2013-03-13 07:03

16 楼

明显不止60吧。
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=haiying+shen&hl=en&btnG=Sea

Z*S2013-03-13 07:03

17 楼

Qie. Using one of my own papers as an example, google
scholar showed 150 solid citations, Microsofe Citation
only showed 25, the other 125 went missing. The
citation index based on microsoft citation therefore
is a severe underestimate -- a wrong data point.
Got it? Logic, do you have any?

find but Microsoft Citation cannot? Just get an idea.
is true, it will be a systematic error which applies to all researchers and
scholars. For the comparison purpose, it is still a fair game for all
authors. In other words,assuming what you have suggested is true that Google
Scholar is up-to-date, if 女AP has low citation and reward numbers in the
Microsoft Scholar, she would be positioned at a similar rank in Google
Scholar in comparison with others.

【在 F******F 的大作中提到】

: 1. I am not sure how you draw the conclusion that Microsoft Citation is
: outdated. Can you give a couple of 女AP's papers that Google Scholar can find but Microsoft Citation cannot? Just get an idea.
: 2. Microsoft Citation is obvious user-friendly. If what you have suggested is true, it will be a systematic error which applies to all researchers and scholars. For the comparison purpose, it is still a fair game for all authors. In other words,assuming what you have suggested is true that Google Scholar is up-to-date, if 女AP has low citation and reward numbers in the Microsoft Scholar, she would be positioned at a similar rank in Google Scholar in comparison with others.
: BTW, you should work on your logic a bit more.

F*F2013-03-13 07:03

18 楼

呵呵，Google Scholar把 “H Shen”、“Haiying Qin 。。。。 Mian Shen”、
“HH Shen” 、“W Shen”、第一作者、第N个作者等等诸如此类全都囊括在内包容
万象，一下子列了N页。。。
眼睛和眼镜擦了N边。。。
就目前来说还是觉得Micorsoft Scholar 比较靠谱，当然Google Scholar有很大的
可以改善的空间，以后赶上来也是可能的

【在 j***b 的大作中提到】

: 明显不止60吧。
: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=haiying+shen&hl=en&btnG=Sea

F*F2013-03-13 07:03

19 楼

Show me the link :) and "150 solid citations".
I have seen Microsoft Citation but I cannot find Google Scholar Citation
numbers.
If you are right, I would be happy to admit it.

and
Google

【在 Z**S 的大作中提到】

: Qie. Using one of my own papers as an example, google
: scholar showed 150 solid citations, Microsofe Citation
: only showed 25, the other 125 went missing. The
: citation index based on microsoft citation therefore
: is a severe underestimate -- a wrong data point.
: Got it? Logic, do you have any?
:
: find but Microsoft Citation cannot? Just get an idea.
: is true, it will be a systematic error which applies to all researchers and
: scholars. For the comparison purpose, it is still a fair game for all

l*o2013-03-13 07:03

20 楼

是的，所以我们都建议秋大妈把自己家那个男小三正法了算了，以平民愤：）

【在 c*********r 的大作中提到】

j*b2013-03-13 07:03

21 楼

难道第二个不是就是这个shen写的么？那个是28个。后面还有很多十几个的。我没加。但是我觉得不止60多吧。
第一个也是。只不过是国内的，所以我都没加进去。
你眼睛再多擦几次，看看能不能清楚一些。
你以为我不知道有的作者不是这个shen么？那第三个600多个citition你以为我要是没看出来不会提一下么？

【在 F******F 的大作中提到】

: 呵呵，Google Scholar把 “H Shen”、“Haiying Qin 。。。。 Mian Shen”、
: “HH Shen” 、“W Shen”、第一作者、第N个作者等等诸如此类全都囊括在内包容
: 万象，一下子列了N页。。。
: 眼睛和眼镜擦了N边。。。
: 就目前来说还是觉得Micorsoft Scholar 比较靠谱，当然Google Scholar有很大的
: 可以改善的空间，以后赶上来也是可能的

F*F2013-03-13 07:03

22 楼

哇塞。。。看来我是死磕到底的人
玩了玩Google Scholar Advance Search
Three Search criteria:
1. include "clemson"
2. exact word "haiying shen"
3. Search only in Engineering, Computer Science, and Mathematics.
Results:
"Articles excluding patent include citations" --> "Results 1 - 10 of about 15
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_q=clemson&num=10&as_epq=ha
as_eq=&as_occt=any&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1&as_
subj=eng&
as_sdtf=&as_sdts=5&btnG=Search+Scholar&hl=en
==================
Three Search criteria:
1. include "Wayne State University"
2. exact word "haiying shen"
3. Search only in Engineering, Computer Science, and Mathematics.
Results:
"Articles excluding patent include citations" --> Results 1 - 10 of about 30
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_q=Wayne+State+University&n
shen&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=any&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&
as_sdt=1&
as_subj=eng&as_sdtf=&as_sdts=5&btnG=Search+Scholar&hl=en
CITATION + ARTICLES = 45 篇
欢迎补充

j*b2013-03-13 07:03

23 楼

我服了你了。你就说我那个链接前两个是不是shen的吧。它俩的citition加起来多少。

15
as_

【在 F******F 的大作中提到】

: 哇塞。。。看来我是死磕到底的人
: 玩了玩Google Scholar Advance Search
: Three Search criteria:
: 1. include "clemson"
: 2. exact word "haiying shen"
: 3. Search only in Engineering, Computer Science, and Mathematics.
: Results:
: "Articles excluding patent include citations" --> "Results 1 - 10 of about 15
: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_q=clemson&num=10&as_epq=ha
: as_eq=&as_occt=any&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1&as_

F*F2013-03-13 07:03

24 楼

俺果然比较无聊，居然数CITATION：CLEMSON 1个，WAYNE STATE 1个。
第一作者大约20篇的样子。
俺脚的Google Scholar不对劲啊。。。。

j*b2013-03-13 07:03

25 楼

感觉跟你交流有点费劲。
我那个链接里，前两个都是shen的。第一个cited by 44,第二个28你可以试着加一加看
看离60差多少。

【在 F******F 的大作中提到】

: 俺果然比较无聊，居然数CITATION：CLEMSON 1个，WAYNE STATE 1个。
: 第一作者大约20篇的样子。
: 俺脚的Google Scholar不对劲啊。。。。

j*b2013-03-13 07:03

26 楼

你那个微软链接我也看了。那个44个citition的在微软那个里面只给算了两个。

【在 j***b 的大作中提到】

: 感觉跟你交流有点费劲。
: 我那个链接里，前两个都是shen的。第一个cited by 44,第二个28你可以试着加一加看
: 看离60差多少。

F*F2013-03-13 07:03

27 楼

对的对的

【在 l******o 的大作中提到】

: 是的，所以我们都建议秋大妈把自己家那个男小三正法了算了，以平民愤：）

F*F2013-03-13 07:03

28 楼

Google Scholar:
ARTICLE 共计45 篇，第一作者大约20几篇. 最多的一篇有44个CITATIONS.
CITATION 共计209.
Microsoft Scholar:
Publications: 53 | Citations: 69
==========
有人能给个这行牛人的名字学校么？俺不识货，但知道货比货