你碰到这种事该怎么办？# Living
m*a
1 楼
弱背景，收到RFE，带孩子好累，没太多精力,本来打算直接放弃，但律师建议回复，心
里有点动摇，请高手指点一下我的CASE值得再花时间吗？还是直接放弃算了？
背景：文章12
引用：146，大概一半是一作的引用,化学背景,引用太少
审稿：3，一个会议host邀请但是没去
CLAIM 老三样，Contribution没过， rfe上理由如下
You have provided;
a)Letters of support
b)146 citations
c)Original research as it relates to DNA-protein cross-link structure and
her work of CARS
d)Published in notable journals
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that the beneficiary's contributions are considered to be of major
significance in the field of endeavor. USCIS has carefully reviewed the
letters of support and clearly these letters have established the petitioner
has conducted original research; however, these letters fall short in
establishing how these findings are considered a major significant
contribution. It has not been established her work has been heavily cited or
widely implemented beyond the routine citation record within the research
field. While it is notable the petitioner has had her work published in
notable journals this in itself is not a major significant contribution. The
petitioner must established her work has made a major significant
contribution within the field beyond the normal references receive. To
assist in determining wheather the beneficiary's contributions are original
and of major significance in the field, the petitioner may submit:
- Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary's
contribution to the field
- Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently consider
the beneficiary's work important
-Evidence of the beneficiary's work being implemented by others. Possible
evidence may include but not limited to:
. Contracts with companies using the beneficiary's products
. Licensed being used by others
. Patents currently being utilized and shown to be significantly to the
field
其实这样的背景没有直接deny已经很给面子了， 律师建议回复，第一二条里面深挖引
用还有点可能,第三条里面的Contract,patent肯定是没有的.有点后悔递交的时候太冲
动，现在看来真是白花钱白花精力，不知道这个RFE值得不值得回复，请版上大牛给点
建议,感激至极
里有点动摇，请高手指点一下我的CASE值得再花时间吗？还是直接放弃算了？
背景：文章12
引用：146，大概一半是一作的引用,化学背景,引用太少
审稿：3，一个会议host邀请但是没去
CLAIM 老三样，Contribution没过， rfe上理由如下
You have provided;
a)Letters of support
b)146 citations
c)Original research as it relates to DNA-protein cross-link structure and
her work of CARS
d)Published in notable journals
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that the beneficiary's contributions are considered to be of major
significance in the field of endeavor. USCIS has carefully reviewed the
letters of support and clearly these letters have established the petitioner
has conducted original research; however, these letters fall short in
establishing how these findings are considered a major significant
contribution. It has not been established her work has been heavily cited or
widely implemented beyond the routine citation record within the research
field. While it is notable the petitioner has had her work published in
notable journals this in itself is not a major significant contribution. The
petitioner must established her work has made a major significant
contribution within the field beyond the normal references receive. To
assist in determining wheather the beneficiary's contributions are original
and of major significance in the field, the petitioner may submit:
- Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary's
contribution to the field
- Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently consider
the beneficiary's work important
-Evidence of the beneficiary's work being implemented by others. Possible
evidence may include but not limited to:
. Contracts with companies using the beneficiary's products
. Licensed being used by others
. Patents currently being utilized and shown to be significantly to the
field
其实这样的背景没有直接deny已经很给面子了， 律师建议回复，第一二条里面深挖引
用还有点可能,第三条里面的Contract,patent肯定是没有的.有点后悔递交的时候太冲
动，现在看来真是白花钱白花精力，不知道这个RFE值得不值得回复，请版上大牛给点
建议,感激至极