【影视歌曲翻唱】你是我归乡的路-宋祖英# Music - 天籁之音
c*s
1 楼
[Your Name]
[Street Address]
[City, ST ZIP Code]
August 14, 2011
[Recipient Name]
[Title]
[Street Address]
[City, ST ZIP Code]
Sub: China employment-based category being treated unfairly from October
2010 to April 2011
Dear Congressman XXX:
I am writing to express my dissatisfaction with the application of the
Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) when allotting visas by the Department
of State Immigrant Control and Reporting Division Visa Services Office. I
understand the value of our time and thus do not write you today to expend
it unduly on matters not worthy of immediate attention.
Section 202 (a)(1) Nondiscrimination states that “no person shall … be
discriminated against in the issuance of an immigrant visa because of the
person’s … place of birth”. This rule is provided so that one country
will not monopolize the visa process. However, I have found that China
employment-based category was treated inappropriately during the first seven
months in fiscal year 2011.
The following table shows employment-based preference visas allotted to
India and China by month from October 2010 to April 2011.
这里是个数据表格（格式自己改回表格）
Month India China
October, 2010 1,747 980
November, 2010 945 655
December 2010 1,232 573
January 2011 1,114 662
Febary 2011 829 511
March 2011 1,355 630
April 2011 1,401 954
Total (Oct., 2010 - April 2011) 8,623 4,965
Employment-Based per-country limit of Fiscal Year 2011 9,800 8,800
Visa usage percentage in the first seven months 88% 56%
Data are from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Application to Register
Permanent Residence or Adjust Status (I-485) with a Classification of
Employment Based Approvals for Fiscal Year 2011 by Month and Country of
Birth.
As listed in the above table, in the first seven months, India has been
assigned 8,623 employment-based visas, which is 88% of its annual limit,
while China only consumed 4,965 employment-based visas, 56% of its annual
limit. It is important to point out that those data are solely from
employment-based visas numbers for each country, and don’t include Family
Fall Across and Spill Over visas that were assigned after April 2011. It is
very clear that China employment-based category was treated unfairly since
its percentage of visa assignment is much lower than that of India. As a
matter of fact, the current way of setting China employment-based cut-off
dates makes it a disadvantaged group compared to other country.
I humbly request you to take the necessary actions to make the corrections
in time.
I respectfully expect your assistance to resolve this situation in the
following two ways:
1) Discuss this matter with the Visa Office and urge them to [Add request
here]
2) Monitor the allocation of visa numbers.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. I look forward to
hearing from you.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
[Street Address]
[City, ST ZIP Code]
August 14, 2011
[Recipient Name]
[Title]
[Street Address]
[City, ST ZIP Code]
Sub: China employment-based category being treated unfairly from October
2010 to April 2011
Dear Congressman XXX:
I am writing to express my dissatisfaction with the application of the
Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) when allotting visas by the Department
of State Immigrant Control and Reporting Division Visa Services Office. I
understand the value of our time and thus do not write you today to expend
it unduly on matters not worthy of immediate attention.
Section 202 (a)(1) Nondiscrimination states that “no person shall … be
discriminated against in the issuance of an immigrant visa because of the
person’s … place of birth”. This rule is provided so that one country
will not monopolize the visa process. However, I have found that China
employment-based category was treated inappropriately during the first seven
months in fiscal year 2011.
The following table shows employment-based preference visas allotted to
India and China by month from October 2010 to April 2011.
这里是个数据表格（格式自己改回表格）
Month India China
October, 2010 1,747 980
November, 2010 945 655
December 2010 1,232 573
January 2011 1,114 662
Febary 2011 829 511
March 2011 1,355 630
April 2011 1,401 954
Total (Oct., 2010 - April 2011) 8,623 4,965
Employment-Based per-country limit of Fiscal Year 2011 9,800 8,800
Visa usage percentage in the first seven months 88% 56%
Data are from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Application to Register
Permanent Residence or Adjust Status (I-485) with a Classification of
Employment Based Approvals for Fiscal Year 2011 by Month and Country of
Birth.
As listed in the above table, in the first seven months, India has been
assigned 8,623 employment-based visas, which is 88% of its annual limit,
while China only consumed 4,965 employment-based visas, 56% of its annual
limit. It is important to point out that those data are solely from
employment-based visas numbers for each country, and don’t include Family
Fall Across and Spill Over visas that were assigned after April 2011. It is
very clear that China employment-based category was treated unfairly since
its percentage of visa assignment is much lower than that of India. As a
matter of fact, the current way of setting China employment-based cut-off
dates makes it a disadvantaged group compared to other country.
I humbly request you to take the necessary actions to make the corrections
in time.
I respectfully expect your assistance to resolve this situation in the
following two ways:
1) Discuss this matter with the Visa Office and urge them to [Add request
here]
2) Monitor the allocation of visa numbers.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. I look forward to
hearing from you.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
