Michigan’s ban on unequal treatment case# Parenting - 为人父母
y*y
1 楼
Although the U.S. Constitution’s 14th Amendment says “No state shall
;;. . . deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws,” some Affirmative Action proponents insist that the
following provision of Michigan’s Constitution violates the equal-
protection guarantee: No public university, college or school district may
“discriminate against, or grant preferential treatment to, any individual
or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in
the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting.”
Yes, in next Tuesday’s , the court will be urged to declare that Michigan’
s ban on unequal treatment violates the U.S. Constitution’s equal-
protection clause.
Does it make sense? Please visit and like our facebook page at
https://www.facebook.com/AgainstAA
;;. . . deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws,” some Affirmative Action proponents insist that the
following provision of Michigan’s Constitution violates the equal-
protection guarantee: No public university, college or school district may
“discriminate against, or grant preferential treatment to, any individual
or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in
the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting.”
Yes, in next Tuesday’s , the court will be urged to declare that Michigan’
s ban on unequal treatment violates the U.S. Constitution’s equal-
protection clause.
Does it make sense? Please visit and like our facebook page at
https://www.facebook.com/AgainstAA