反SCA5-大家请寄实体信反对西非裔党团成立commission(非公开） (转载)# Parenting - 为人父母
n*h
1 楼
【 以下文字转载自 SanFrancisco 讨论区 】
发信人: svca (SVCA), 信区: SanFrancisco
标 题: 反SCA5-大家请寄实体信反对西非裔党团成立commission(非公开）
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Apr 2 02:00:29 2014, 美东)
请所有居住在加州的兄弟姐妹打电话抗议，公民和绿卡身份者寄信！！
3/25 加州民主党西非裔党团声称要在参众两院成立一个commission去调查SCA5提案牵
涉的大学招生，入学和防止在校生流失等问题。commission 是顾问性质的（advisory
）, 因此其成员是指定的，开会也不用记录，完全有暗箱操作的嫌疑。
普通人很难区分开commission(非公开)和committee(公开)的概念的。而此时，以
Hernandez为首的支持SCA5的民主党人抛出这样一个令人混淆的概念，不免令人揣测其
居心。
现在我们要做的，就是督促当局成立一个Joint Selected Committee来做这件事，其
中成员包括参议员，众议员，民主党人和共和党人，所有会议内容将是被记录的。我们
汲取SCA5静悄悄的在参议院通过的教训，我们要求公正和公开的调查。
大家只需要打印出，在信封上写好地址，贴上50分的邮票即可贡献自己的力量保护我们
子孙的权益，保障美国大学教育的质量。请加州绿卡和公民的兄弟姐妹贡献一份自己的
力量!!!
您可以寄一封信到任何的地址，如果您愿意，请寄信到以下全部的地址。谢谢。
地址：
Senator Ed Hernandez
State Capitol, Room 2080
Sacramento, CA 95814
Ms. Toni Atkins
State Capitol
P.O. Box 942849
Sacramento, CA 94249-0078
Senator Darrell Steinberg
State Capitol, Room 205
Sacramento, CA 95814
格式信件如下：
Dear __________________:
I write to urge you to establish a bipartisan committee to investigate SCA 5
in a transparent way.
As you know, SCA 5 is a constitutional amendment that would encourage racial
discrimination in California’s public education systems. Such State-
sponsored discrimination will stir up racial hostilities in California.
SCA 5 was passed in the Senate strictly along the partisan line. No
responsible citizen would like to see such a result—it is bad for
California and America.
I appreciate the effort of our legislators that resulted in a joint
statement regarding SCA 5 on March 17, 2014, which temporarily put SCA 5 on
hold. I trust that this action embodied true political wisdom rather than
short-term interest in votes.
The joint statement aimed “to have an honest and thoughtful conversation.”
Yet, it also stated that “a bicameral commission” would be formed and “
the charge and membership of the commission [would] be determined by the
Speaker and Senate President pro tem.”
With all due respect, this proposed commission will unlikely be bipartisan,
given the political reality within our state legislature. In fact, Senator
Bob Huff publicly commented that none of the Republican Senators had been
invited to this commission, and any “meeting [would] likely be convened as
a lopsided testimony in an attempt to lead the public to the conclusion that
the concepts found in SCA 5 are good for California.” http://district29.cssrc.us/content/huff-weekly-capitol-comment-163.
I am deeply concerned about this dire situation. I urge you to act as a
responsible legislator for all Californians and establish a truly bipartisan
committee—rather than a “bicameral commission”—to thoroughly
investigate SCA 5 in a transparent way. Thank you.
Sincerely,
[Sender Name]
如果您不是绿卡或者公民，请打电话到三位议员办公室反对，号码如下：
Ed Hernandez:
916-651-4024
626-430-2499
323-981-3320
Toni Atkins:
916-319-2078
619-645-3090
Darrell Steinberg
916-651-4006
916-651-1529
发信人: svca (SVCA), 信区: SanFrancisco
标 题: 反SCA5-大家请寄实体信反对西非裔党团成立commission(非公开）
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Apr 2 02:00:29 2014, 美东)
请所有居住在加州的兄弟姐妹打电话抗议，公民和绿卡身份者寄信！！
3/25 加州民主党西非裔党团声称要在参众两院成立一个commission去调查SCA5提案牵
涉的大学招生，入学和防止在校生流失等问题。commission 是顾问性质的（advisory
）, 因此其成员是指定的，开会也不用记录，完全有暗箱操作的嫌疑。
普通人很难区分开commission(非公开)和committee(公开)的概念的。而此时，以
Hernandez为首的支持SCA5的民主党人抛出这样一个令人混淆的概念，不免令人揣测其
居心。
现在我们要做的，就是督促当局成立一个Joint Selected Committee来做这件事，其
中成员包括参议员，众议员，民主党人和共和党人，所有会议内容将是被记录的。我们
汲取SCA5静悄悄的在参议院通过的教训，我们要求公正和公开的调查。
大家只需要打印出，在信封上写好地址，贴上50分的邮票即可贡献自己的力量保护我们
子孙的权益，保障美国大学教育的质量。请加州绿卡和公民的兄弟姐妹贡献一份自己的
力量!!!
您可以寄一封信到任何的地址，如果您愿意，请寄信到以下全部的地址。谢谢。
地址：
Senator Ed Hernandez
State Capitol, Room 2080
Sacramento, CA 95814
Ms. Toni Atkins
State Capitol
P.O. Box 942849
Sacramento, CA 94249-0078
Senator Darrell Steinberg
State Capitol, Room 205
Sacramento, CA 95814
格式信件如下：
Dear __________________:
I write to urge you to establish a bipartisan committee to investigate SCA 5
in a transparent way.
As you know, SCA 5 is a constitutional amendment that would encourage racial
discrimination in California’s public education systems. Such State-
sponsored discrimination will stir up racial hostilities in California.
SCA 5 was passed in the Senate strictly along the partisan line. No
responsible citizen would like to see such a result—it is bad for
California and America.
I appreciate the effort of our legislators that resulted in a joint
statement regarding SCA 5 on March 17, 2014, which temporarily put SCA 5 on
hold. I trust that this action embodied true political wisdom rather than
short-term interest in votes.
The joint statement aimed “to have an honest and thoughtful conversation.”
Yet, it also stated that “a bicameral commission” would be formed and “
the charge and membership of the commission [would] be determined by the
Speaker and Senate President pro tem.”
With all due respect, this proposed commission will unlikely be bipartisan,
given the political reality within our state legislature. In fact, Senator
Bob Huff publicly commented that none of the Republican Senators had been
invited to this commission, and any “meeting [would] likely be convened as
a lopsided testimony in an attempt to lead the public to the conclusion that
the concepts found in SCA 5 are good for California.” http://district29.cssrc.us/content/huff-weekly-capitol-comment-163.
I am deeply concerned about this dire situation. I urge you to act as a
responsible legislator for all Californians and establish a truly bipartisan
committee—rather than a “bicameral commission”—to thoroughly
investigate SCA 5 in a transparent way. Thank you.
Sincerely,
[Sender Name]
如果您不是绿卡或者公民，请打电话到三位议员办公室反对，号码如下：
Ed Hernandez:
916-651-4024
626-430-2499
323-981-3320
Toni Atkins:
916-319-2078
619-645-3090
Darrell Steinberg
916-651-4006
916-651-1529