安卓系统没法解决优酷土豆这种限制海外IP的问题么？# PDA - 掌中宝
H*i
1 楼
IV居然去听证会,老印也算搞了一点名堂出来了。
if I post link, the post will be deleted
if I post link, the post will be deleted
L*i
2 楼
windows可以下个unlock youku
板子上貌似就没办法了？
板子上貌似就没办法了？
H*i
3 楼
Link is here: judiciary.house.gov/hearings/113th/02052013/Arora%2002052013.
pdf
There are entrepreneurs like Kunal Bahl, an engineer from the University of
Pennsylvania with an MBA from Wharton, who started a company while in
college that now sells to thousands of U.S. stores. The problem is that in
2007, when his H-1b visa ran out, Kunal simply gave up on the U.S.
immigration system and sought greener pastures back home in India. Kunal’s
company now employs more than
8
1500 people…in India. While we have few hard statistics on these types of
opportunity costs, most immigration experts agree the number of foreign-born
workers returning to India and China annually is on the rise and in the
tens of thousands. The Chinese Ministry of Education estimates the number of
emigrants who returned to China last year was a record 134,800, up 25% from
108,000 in 2009. As many have highlighted, Intel, Google, Yahoo and eBay
were all founded by immigrants. Knowing what we know today, would we not do
whatever it took to keep these innovators in America?
There are entrepreneurs like Kunal Bahl, an engineer from the University of
Pennsylvania with an MBA from Wharton, who started a company while in
college that now sells to thousands of U.S. stores. The problem is that in
2007, when his H-1b visa ran out, Kunal simply gave up on the U.S.
immigration system and sought greener pastures back home in India. Kunal’s
company now employs more than
8
1500 people…in India. While we have few hard statistics on these types of
opportunity costs, most immigration experts agree the number of foreign-born
workers returning to India and China annually is on the rise and in the
tens of thousands. The Chinese Ministry of Education estimates the number of
emigrants who returned to China last year was a record 134,800, up 25% from
108,000 in 2009. As many have highlighted, Intel, Google, Yahoo and eBay
were all founded by immigrants. Knowing what we know today, would we not do
whatever it took to keep these innovators in America?
N*k
4 楼
MARK
m*l
5 楼
you can post a link
with some modifications to make it not like a link
【在 H******i 的大作中提到】
: IV居然去听证会,老印也算搞了一点名堂出来了。
: if I post link, the post will be deleted
with some modifications to make it not like a link
【在 H******i 的大作中提到】
: IV居然去听证会,老印也算搞了一点名堂出来了。
: if I post link, the post will be deleted
L*i
6 楼
看着还不如在pc上用chrome……
H*i
7 楼
Recapture previously authorized but unused green card numbers—also,
discussed above, recapturing previously authorized but unused green cards
will allow Congress to help clear the employment-based backlog without
authorizing any additional visas. These visas were already provided by law,
but due in many cases to bureaucratic inefficiencies, they were lost.
Recapturing is an option that requires no major changes to the immigration
system.
Raise the employment-based green card cap to 290,000 visas per year—raising
the cap on employment-based green cards is the most obvious solution to the
employment-based problem. While this option may be the least politically
acceptable to some in Congress, it is also the simplest with clear and
absolute caps.
discussed above, recapturing previously authorized but unused green cards
will allow Congress to help clear the employment-based backlog without
authorizing any additional visas. These visas were already provided by law,
but due in many cases to bureaucratic inefficiencies, they were lost.
Recapturing is an option that requires no major changes to the immigration
system.
Raise the employment-based green card cap to 290,000 visas per year—raising
the cap on employment-based green cards is the most obvious solution to the
employment-based problem. While this option may be the least politically
acceptable to some in Congress, it is also the simplest with clear and
absolute caps.
L*i
8 楼
坚决和果粉划清界限……
l*7
9 楼
只要人多，够坚持，一定能搞出名堂。
ps, recapture应该是条最快最有效的路。
ps, recapture应该是条最快最有效的路。
l*i
10 楼
我用的付费VPN，速度不错。
P*1
11 楼
is there anything we can contribute
r*e
12 楼
这个have8很好用啊.我看奥运全靠它.
【在 L**i 的大作中提到】
: 看着还不如在pc上用chrome……
【在 L**i 的大作中提到】
: 看着还不如在pc上用chrome……
H*i
13 楼
首先，外国人在美国直接lobby是有法律风险的，所以去年我反复强调要求lobby公司将
服务内容定性为political intellegience也就是打探情报，而真正直接lobby的是爱荷
华的华人社团领袖出面，我们只是在幕后委托。
其次，现在大家都很有钱，都愿意捐钱，但是木有team干活。钱捐了也容易被lobbist
很快骗光。必须有PD是2012甚至2013的人才有干劲和血性！
如果有一个PD是2013年的新人出面担纲，大概能够凑到一万块钱做事，主要集中火力给
反对移民改革的议员施加压力也就算尽到人事了。
女孩子们给第一夫人写信发照片陈情，黑婆会帮黑公的，如果有的人的故事能够打动人
，黑婆在某个公众场合谈一下，说不定能够捞到几个赞成票。
【在 P****1 的大作中提到】
: is there anything we can contribute
服务内容定性为political intellegience也就是打探情报，而真正直接lobby的是爱荷
华的华人社团领袖出面，我们只是在幕后委托。
其次，现在大家都很有钱，都愿意捐钱，但是木有team干活。钱捐了也容易被lobbist
很快骗光。必须有PD是2012甚至2013的人才有干劲和血性！
如果有一个PD是2013年的新人出面担纲，大概能够凑到一万块钱做事，主要集中火力给
反对移民改革的议员施加压力也就算尽到人事了。
女孩子们给第一夫人写信发照片陈情，黑婆会帮黑公的，如果有的人的故事能够打动人
，黑婆在某个公众场合谈一下，说不定能够捞到几个赞成票。
【在 P****1 的大作中提到】
: is there anything we can contribute
P*D
14 楼
http://www.vpn123.com/
先用免费账号登录，然后点视频开始缓冲，等缓冲一开始你就可以断开连接了。因为免
费账号有种种限制。
先用免费账号登录，然后点视频开始缓冲，等缓冲一开始你就可以断开连接了。因为免
费账号有种种限制。
f*i
15 楼
DING
f*i
16 楼
DING
k*b
17 楼
嗯，昨天看听证会日程，赫然看到IV排在最前面
P*1
18 楼
等12，13 的pd，这个财年可能够呛了，好像都觉得大赦是板上钉钉的事了，应该能
high到9/30
lobbist
【在 H******i 的大作中提到】
: 首先，外国人在美国直接lobby是有法律风险的，所以去年我反复强调要求lobby公司将
: 服务内容定性为political intellegience也就是打探情报，而真正直接lobby的是爱荷
: 华的华人社团领袖出面，我们只是在幕后委托。
: 其次，现在大家都很有钱，都愿意捐钱，但是木有team干活。钱捐了也容易被lobbist
: 很快骗光。必须有PD是2012甚至2013的人才有干劲和血性！
: 如果有一个PD是2013年的新人出面担纲，大概能够凑到一万块钱做事，主要集中火力给
: 反对移民改革的议员施加压力也就算尽到人事了。
: 女孩子们给第一夫人写信发照片陈情，黑婆会帮黑公的，如果有的人的故事能够打动人
: ，黑婆在某个公众场合谈一下，说不定能够捞到几个赞成票。
high到9/30
lobbist
【在 H******i 的大作中提到】
: 首先，外国人在美国直接lobby是有法律风险的，所以去年我反复强调要求lobby公司将
: 服务内容定性为political intellegience也就是打探情报，而真正直接lobby的是爱荷
: 华的华人社团领袖出面，我们只是在幕后委托。
: 其次，现在大家都很有钱，都愿意捐钱，但是木有team干活。钱捐了也容易被lobbist
: 很快骗光。必须有PD是2012甚至2013的人才有干劲和血性！
: 如果有一个PD是2013年的新人出面担纲，大概能够凑到一万块钱做事，主要集中火力给
: 反对移民改革的议员施加压力也就算尽到人事了。
: 女孩子们给第一夫人写信发照片陈情，黑婆会帮黑公的，如果有的人的故事能够打动人
: ，黑婆在某个公众场合谈一下，说不定能够捞到几个赞成票。
z*a
19 楼
原文：
Crovitz: The Economics of Immigration
Adding more skilled workers would bring in an estimated $100 billion in
federal revenues over a decade, largely from increased income taxes.
By L. GORDON CROVITZ
Columnist's name
For the first time in a generation, the debate over immigration has turned
to the opportunities, not the burdens. Washington might finally deliver
immigration reform, especially as politicians realize that adding more
skilled workers is the fastest way to boost the economy and avoid a fiscal
crisis.
Silicon Valley is the poster child for today's dysfunctional immigration
policy. Foreign technologists trained in the U.S. are routinely denied work
visas and return home to become successful entrepreneurs in China and India.
For many years, half of Silicon Valley startups have had an immigrant
founder, but this trend is in decline as fewer foreigners can find a
foothold on the path to citizenship.
Steve Jobs famously turned against Barack Obama in 2011 when the president
wouldn't sponsor a law to award work visas to foreigners who earn advanced
degrees in technology and the sciences, despite the shortage of native-born
skilled workers. "The president is very smart, but he kept explaining to us
reasons why things can't get done," Jobs told biographer Walter Isaacson. "
It infuriates me."
The last time the U.S. reformed immigration policy was in 1986, when
President Reagan created a political coalition by focusing on immigrants as
assets, not as liabilities, a sharp contrast with Mitt Romney's suggestion
last year that they should pursue "self-deportation." President Obama last
week embraced postelection bipartisan reform in a speech using the words "
economy" or "economic" 10 times. Immigration, he said, "keeps our workforce
young; it keeps our country on the cutting edge." Sending skilled graduates
back home "is not how you grow new industries in America. That's how you
give new industries to our competitors. That's why we need comprehensive
immigration reform."
image
image
Getty Images
We also need a comprehensive rethinking of the purpose of the immigration
laws. It's not widely understood that for more than a century the main goal
of the immigration laws has been to set racial and ethnic quotas—not to
attract the best and brightest from around the world.
Since 1899, immigrants have been designated by "race or people." Until the
1920s, there were few limits aside from the ban on laborers under the
Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882. That changed with the Immigration Act of 1924
, which created the federal Quota Board to "preserve the ideal of American
homogeneity" by setting quotas that favored Protestant Europeans. "The
calculus of numerical restriction in the 1920s was aimed at engineering the
racial composition of the nation; it had nothing to do with the economics of
absorption," wrote historian Mae Ngai in her 2004 book on immigration
policy, "Impossible Subjects."
Many parts of the immigration system are still based on quotas. Visas for
permanent residency are capped, so that no country can have more than 7%
each year. There is an annual limit of 140,000 green cards for employment-
based immigrants, so the ceiling means that while immigrants from small
countries like Belgium and Guinea have a good chance, the waiting list for
citizens of populous countries like China and India can last for decades.
More broadly, of all the developed countries, the U.S. puts the lowest
priority on potential economic benefits when reviewing prospective
immigrants, according to Pia Orrenius, an economist with the Federal Reserve
Bank of Dallas. She estimates that of the 1.1 million green cards issued
every year, 85% are to family members or for humanitarian purposes. Only 15%
are for highly skilled immigrants based on employment, and half of those go
to the workers' spouses and children. Australia, Britain and Canada are
outcompeting the U.S. for skilled people by using a point system based on
immigrants' education and ability to invest or start companies.
The parts of the U.S. system that are designed to boost the economy need
updating. The H-1B visa program, established in 1990, creates 65,000 visas a
year for highly skilled workers. But the demand for skilled technologists
has grown so much since then that in some years this quota has been filled
within hours. No wonder Steve Jobs was impatient.
Smarter immigration policy would give less-skilled immigrants a path to
citizenship that could include language and civics requirements. The
Congressional Budget Office estimates that legalizing the estimated 11
million illegal immigrants in the U.S. would boost revenues by $48 billion
over 10 years while costing $23 billion in increased public services.
Former CBO official Arlene Holen estimates in a Technology Policy Institute
paper that adding more skilled workers would bring in $100 billion in over a
decade, largely from increased income taxes.
It's time to focus on the economic opportunities that immigrants can bring
to the country, regardless of their origin. That would be good both for
American economics and for American values.
Crovitz: The Economics of Immigration
Adding more skilled workers would bring in an estimated $100 billion in
federal revenues over a decade, largely from increased income taxes.
By L. GORDON CROVITZ
Columnist's name
For the first time in a generation, the debate over immigration has turned
to the opportunities, not the burdens. Washington might finally deliver
immigration reform, especially as politicians realize that adding more
skilled workers is the fastest way to boost the economy and avoid a fiscal
crisis.
Silicon Valley is the poster child for today's dysfunctional immigration
policy. Foreign technologists trained in the U.S. are routinely denied work
visas and return home to become successful entrepreneurs in China and India.
For many years, half of Silicon Valley startups have had an immigrant
founder, but this trend is in decline as fewer foreigners can find a
foothold on the path to citizenship.
Steve Jobs famously turned against Barack Obama in 2011 when the president
wouldn't sponsor a law to award work visas to foreigners who earn advanced
degrees in technology and the sciences, despite the shortage of native-born
skilled workers. "The president is very smart, but he kept explaining to us
reasons why things can't get done," Jobs told biographer Walter Isaacson. "
It infuriates me."
The last time the U.S. reformed immigration policy was in 1986, when
President Reagan created a political coalition by focusing on immigrants as
assets, not as liabilities, a sharp contrast with Mitt Romney's suggestion
last year that they should pursue "self-deportation." President Obama last
week embraced postelection bipartisan reform in a speech using the words "
economy" or "economic" 10 times. Immigration, he said, "keeps our workforce
young; it keeps our country on the cutting edge." Sending skilled graduates
back home "is not how you grow new industries in America. That's how you
give new industries to our competitors. That's why we need comprehensive
immigration reform."
image
image
Getty Images
We also need a comprehensive rethinking of the purpose of the immigration
laws. It's not widely understood that for more than a century the main goal
of the immigration laws has been to set racial and ethnic quotas—not to
attract the best and brightest from around the world.
Since 1899, immigrants have been designated by "race or people." Until the
1920s, there were few limits aside from the ban on laborers under the
Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882. That changed with the Immigration Act of 1924
, which created the federal Quota Board to "preserve the ideal of American
homogeneity" by setting quotas that favored Protestant Europeans. "The
calculus of numerical restriction in the 1920s was aimed at engineering the
racial composition of the nation; it had nothing to do with the economics of
absorption," wrote historian Mae Ngai in her 2004 book on immigration
policy, "Impossible Subjects."
Many parts of the immigration system are still based on quotas. Visas for
permanent residency are capped, so that no country can have more than 7%
each year. There is an annual limit of 140,000 green cards for employment-
based immigrants, so the ceiling means that while immigrants from small
countries like Belgium and Guinea have a good chance, the waiting list for
citizens of populous countries like China and India can last for decades.
More broadly, of all the developed countries, the U.S. puts the lowest
priority on potential economic benefits when reviewing prospective
immigrants, according to Pia Orrenius, an economist with the Federal Reserve
Bank of Dallas. She estimates that of the 1.1 million green cards issued
every year, 85% are to family members or for humanitarian purposes. Only 15%
are for highly skilled immigrants based on employment, and half of those go
to the workers' spouses and children. Australia, Britain and Canada are
outcompeting the U.S. for skilled people by using a point system based on
immigrants' education and ability to invest or start companies.
The parts of the U.S. system that are designed to boost the economy need
updating. The H-1B visa program, established in 1990, creates 65,000 visas a
year for highly skilled workers. But the demand for skilled technologists
has grown so much since then that in some years this quota has been filled
within hours. No wonder Steve Jobs was impatient.
Smarter immigration policy would give less-skilled immigrants a path to
citizenship that could include language and civics requirements. The
Congressional Budget Office estimates that legalizing the estimated 11
million illegal immigrants in the U.S. would boost revenues by $48 billion
over 10 years while costing $23 billion in increased public services.
Former CBO official Arlene Holen estimates in a Technology Policy Institute
paper that adding more skilled workers would bring in $100 billion in over a
decade, largely from increased income taxes.
It's time to focus on the economic opportunities that immigrants can bring
to the country, regardless of their origin. That would be good both for
American economics and for American values.
z*a
20 楼
仔细看了一遍，原文写得很好，是篇很好的 GRE issue.
原文后面有很多 comment,感觉像是 GRE arguement
原文后面有很多 comment,感觉像是 GRE arguement
相关阅读
这个怎样？请达人推荐一个captivate的fryoyo吧自带GPS导航系统，不走数据plan的手机有么？明天Walmart有SmartPhone的DEALkindle 上看 PDF 支持TOC么要是买了iphone和ipad3G，就得付两份data的钱，是么？dockstar装了debian怎么打开NAS的功能啊？有人用过 HTC 的droid incredible吗？赞一下 kindle 3 的电池captivate upgrade for 1 cent on amazonHD2 退休了，现在应该买什么phone?讨论：如何延长Samsung Galaxy S 手机的待机时间请问最近sero有转成功的么Re: LOL google 的open 又成立牌坊了 (转载)新手请教怎样用staples coupon买Kindle在跑步机上看视频应该用什么Tivo可以hack不？ (转载)现在最好的安猪手机是哪一款？1/3 android用渴望iphone, 只有7% iphone渴望android版上有多少人上了sero pre+HTC evo？