果子在天朝的路越走越窄了# PDA - 掌中宝
B*l
1 楼
background:
engineering PhD, now work as a research scientist in a company
16+ publication (most of them are 1st author)
>130 citations
>30 reviews, served in the program committees of a few international
conferences
papers used by some professors as lecture material
one best paper award from a conference
8 reference letters (6 from U.S.), including a support letter from a
conference chair on my review experience
Claim:
authorship, contribution, review
IO是XM359,好像是TSC的Director。
140在6月交上去后一直没动静,实在忍不住了,11月file了PP。拖到第15天,XM359给
律师fax了个NIOD,根据2-step:
1. 承认3个criteria都符合了
2. 但你不够internationally recognized
所以决定拒你。
看完IO的NOID,有这么几条感想:
1.似乎IO没有意识到在CS领域conference的重要,翻来覆去提journal。似乎也没意识
到program committee member的重要性,而几份推荐信里已经强调过这个的重要性了。
2. 认为我的articles是moderately cited,不足以证明international recognized
3. 要求补充证明工作是innovative,而不是简单的replcate others' work。这个明明
推荐信里说了很多次,也列了几个citation sample来证明。
律师的petition letter我看过,所有的要点都写了,条理也不错。现在实在很迷惘,
不知道该补些什么材料?有没有同学好心share一下样本?
如果最后通过了,散尽包子答谢各位!
engineering PhD, now work as a research scientist in a company
16+ publication (most of them are 1st author)
>130 citations
>30 reviews, served in the program committees of a few international
conferences
papers used by some professors as lecture material
one best paper award from a conference
8 reference letters (6 from U.S.), including a support letter from a
conference chair on my review experience
Claim:
authorship, contribution, review
IO是XM359,好像是TSC的Director。
140在6月交上去后一直没动静,实在忍不住了,11月file了PP。拖到第15天,XM359给
律师fax了个NIOD,根据2-step:
1. 承认3个criteria都符合了
2. 但你不够internationally recognized
所以决定拒你。
看完IO的NOID,有这么几条感想:
1.似乎IO没有意识到在CS领域conference的重要,翻来覆去提journal。似乎也没意识
到program committee member的重要性,而几份推荐信里已经强调过这个的重要性了。
2. 认为我的articles是moderately cited,不足以证明international recognized
3. 要求补充证明工作是innovative,而不是简单的replcate others' work。这个明明
推荐信里说了很多次,也列了几个citation sample来证明。
律师的petition letter我看过,所有的要点都写了,条理也不错。现在实在很迷惘,
不知道该补些什么材料?有没有同学好心share一下样本?
如果最后通过了,散尽包子答谢各位!