再提一次老中的思维 - 未名空间MITBBS历史存档

国际科技财经博客移民网络热点娱乐民生时事公众号

Redian新闻

>未名空间

>PDA - 掌中宝

再提一次老中的思维

再提一次老中的思维# PDA - 掌中宝

j*a2012-10-05 07:10

1 楼

我们希望您有扎实的计算机基础，踏实肯干，有上进心，有较强的学习能力，良好的沟
通能力，有意愿长期从事主机操作系统或者主机应用程序的研发工作。
有意者请将您的简历发到c***[email protected],并注明应聘主机操作系统开发职位。如有
疑问，欢迎来信询问。多谢。
Job Description:
System z Software Development organization (in CSTL) is seeking software
engineers taking the responsibilities for design, development and test of
zOS and other System z software products. This team is an integral part of
the STG System z global team and support System z expansion and growth in
the China market.
zOS XML team is to design, implement and test functional enhancements for
the established zOS XML System Services. XML System Services is a functional
component of zOS and contains an XML parser intended for use by system
components, middleware and applications. XML team aims to provide a reliable
, serviceable and high-performance XML engine for z/OS and other enterprise
business applications. The team also provides quality services and
innovative solutions to support STG System z global strategy.
This position is challenging and a great opportunity for new initiatives,
talent development and technical leadership growth. We are looking for self-
starters with strong communication, problem solving, and leadership skills.
Job Responsibilities:
1. Work with the world-wide team on requirement analysis, design,
implementation and verification of new functionality of XML System Services.
2. Maintain and enhance the existing product for quality and other
considerations.
3. Support for L3 Service
4. Work across organization boundaries to achieve objectives.
Job Requirements (skills/experiences/Qualifications)
1. Proficient in C/C++
2. Strong Operating System knowledge on Unix/Linux
3. Solid understanding of large scale enterprise software development
4. Good communication skills
5. Excellent in written and oral English
6. Quick learner with strong problem solving ability
Solid Knowledge or rich experiences in following fields is a strong plus:
1. Good overall z/OS skills, including TSO/ISPF, Batch (JCL), z/OS operating
2. System z architecture, PL/X, Assembler, REXX
3. z/OS problem determination techniques (IPCS)
4. z/OS development processes and tools
5. Software Development Methodologies (e.g. Agile/Lean)
Personal Qualities:
1. Easy-going
2. Open-minded
3. Good team player
4. Creative thinking
5. Passion to business
6. Self-motivated
7. Willing to give back
Qualifications (Education/Major/Certificates):
1. Master degree in Computer Science/Electronic Engineering, or equivalent,
or above.
2. Excellent written and oral English.

Z*l2012-10-05 07:10

2 楼

【以下文字转载自 NewJersey 讨论区】
发信人: elmtang (东郭戒网), 信区: NewJersey
标题: 这个兄弟够狠～～～
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Apr 6 10:47:10 2011, 美东)
被解雇华裔工程师大闹Gucci电脑系统删除多个服务器转载
一名被美国Gucci解雇的华裔网络工程师，因为对公司做法感到不忿，以及想要炫耀自
己的才能，多
番入侵Gucci的电脑系统，干扰网络的运作，关闭服务器及删除内存资料，使得Gucci的
电脑系统瘫
痪，网上购物平台也不能运作，他目前被控50项入侵电脑、身分盗窃、制造虚假商业记
录等罪名，一
经定罪最高可面对15年监禁。
被告男子甄志隆 (Sam Chih Lung Yin，音译) 现年34岁，原藉台湾，现为美国公民，
报称居于
新泽西州泽西市。他原是美国Gucci的网络工程师，2010年因为违反公司规定被开除，
离职后他多次
入侵公司的电脑，最后事发被捕，昨(4日)于曼哈顿刑事法院过堂，暂时获准保释候审。
据检方资料，甄志隆受聘于Gucci期间以其担任网络工程师之职权，利用虚假的员工资
料设立了一个
帐号，方便自己登入公司的络网。被Gucci解雇后，多番使用这个虚假帐户，他利用自
己对Gucci网
络的熟悉，畅通无阻地入侵Gucci的网络，随心所欲的作出不同的指令。
在甄志隆在一次入侵Gucci络网的行动中，Gucci电脑络网的文件及电邮功能瘫痪将近24
小时，大部
分文件及电邮亦被删除，Gucci对此进行修复及补救，花费愈20万元。
另一次入侵时，甄志隆在网络内逗留了两个多小时，这次他删除多个服务器，关闭一个
内存网络，以
及把公司的电子邮箱全删掉，结果Gucci的员工无法登入网络，而且不仅是企业的员工
，更影响至全
国所有商店的经理以及电子商贸部门，对销售造成严重的损失，Gucci的电脑部员工经
过紧急抢修，
也要到当天晚上才能修复。
据甄志隆的律师表示，其当事人的罪行并不涉及任何利益动机，只是想展示自己的电脑
技能。不过，
曼哈顿检察长万斯强调，电脑入侵并不是游戏，而是严重罪行，不仅威胁到企业的保安
系统，也对个
人的隐私、工作及商业带来庞大的损害

b*72012-10-05 07:10

3 楼

想当年我给我和我Lp换手机换成Wp，周围老中朋友就问，为啥不买IPhone，
今年买Minivan买了T&C，周围老中朋友+亲戚都问，为啥不买日本的。
老中的盲从心理什么时候才能改？

a*02012-10-05 07:10

4 楼

ibm在大陆会有编核心的活？

【在 j**a 的大作中提到】

: 我们希望您有扎实的计算机基础，踏实肯干，有上进心，有较强的学习能力，良好的沟
: 通能力，有意愿长期从事主机操作系统或者主机应用程序的研发工作。
: 有意者请将您的简历发到c***[email protected],并注明应聘主机操作系统开发职位。如有
: 疑问，欢迎来信询问。多谢。
: Job Description:
: System z Software Development organization (in CSTL) is seeking software
: engineers taking the responsibilities for design, development and test of
: zOS and other System z software products. This team is an integral part of
: the STG System z global team and support System z expansion and growth in
: the China market.

R*a2012-10-05 07:10

5 楼

话说干这事儿还需要啥技能么?

【在 Z*****l 的大作中提到】

: 【以下文字转载自 NewJersey 讨论区】
: 发信人: elmtang (东郭戒网), 信区: NewJersey
: 标题: 这个兄弟够狠～～～
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Apr 6 10:47:10 2011, 美东)
: 被解雇华裔工程师大闹Gucci电脑系统删除多个服务器转载
: 一名被美国Gucci解雇的华裔网络工程师，因为对公司做法感到不忿，以及想要炫耀自
: 己的才能，多
: 番入侵Gucci的电脑系统，干扰网络的运作，关闭服务器及删除内存资料，使得Gucci的
: 电脑系统瘫
: 痪，网上购物平台也不能运作，他目前被控50项入侵电脑、身分盗窃、制造虚假商业记

T*a2012-10-05 07:10

6 楼

我草，起码你个老中不一样嘛。

【在 b********7 的大作中提到】

: 想当年我给我和我Lp换手机换成Wp，周围老中朋友就问，为啥不买IPhone，
: 今年买Minivan买了T&C，周围老中朋友+亲戚都问，为啥不买日本的。
: 老中的盲从心理什么时候才能改？

d*f2012-10-05 07:10

7 楼

you have to know how to connect to internet at home

【在 R***a 的大作中提到】

: 话说干这事儿还需要啥技能么?

f*e2012-10-05 07:10

8 楼

您是老美？

【在 b********7 的大作中提到】

c*y2012-10-05 07:10

9 楼

美国人不盲从？
iphone的销量大部分靠老中？
日车的销量也靠老中？

【在 b********7 的大作中提到】

w*t2012-10-05 07:10

10 楼

拿难民证的不能算是老美吧？

【在 f*****e 的大作中提到】

: 您是老美？

c*y2012-10-05 07:10

11 楼

凤姐在国内的时候，也觉得老中怎么怎么的，所以要找一个国际视野的。
到了美国之后，猛然醒悟，老美也是那个鸟样，然后就shut up了。
其实凤姐还是很聪明的，非常迅速的明白了一些道理，而有些老中在这
呆了n多年，还是把白人供起来，比如“用Mac的居多是白人。。。”

h*d2012-10-05 07:10

12 楼

不买iPhone也可以考虑android，为啥买Wp7?
odyssey还是很不错的，买T&C图什么feature？
我自己刚买了个c-max，那个prius太肉，实在接受不了。

【在 b********7 的大作中提到】

w*t2012-10-05 07:10

13 楼

说实话，用Mac的居多是中国人。

【在 c*******y 的大作中提到】

: 凤姐在国内的时候，也觉得老中怎么怎么的，所以要找一个国际视野的。
: 到了美国之后，猛然醒悟，老美也是那个鸟样，然后就shut up了。
: 其实凤姐还是很聪明的，非常迅速的明白了一些道理，而有些老中在这
: 呆了n多年，还是把白人供起来，比如“用Mac的居多是白人。。。”

b*72012-10-05 07:10

14 楼

iphone 和安卓都烂大街了。不想掏出个街机来用。
T&C 配置可比两田的好多了。

【在 h*d 的大作中提到】

: 不买iPhone也可以考虑android，为啥买Wp7?
: odyssey还是很不错的，买T&C图什么feature？
: 我自己刚买了个c-max，那个prius太肉，实在接受不了。

h*d2012-10-05 07:10

15 楼

odyssey油耗稍微好一些，具体说说odyssey配置都那里差了？想了解一下，附近一堆朋
友团购了odyssey，坐起来感觉还可以，T&C是同样价格配置好很多？c-max配置倒是比
prius好多了。

【在 b********7 的大作中提到】

: iphone 和安卓都烂大街了。不想掏出个街机来用。
: T&C 配置可比两田的好多了。

b*72012-10-05 07:10

16 楼

T&C base应该就跟奥德赛的EXL配置几乎相等了。何况还有我最欣赏的stow n go功能。

【在 h*d 的大作中提到】

: odyssey油耗稍微好一些，具体说说odyssey配置都那里差了？想了解一下，附近一堆朋
: 友团购了odyssey，坐起来感觉还可以，T&C是同样价格配置好很多？c-max配置倒是比
: prius好多了。

l*o2012-10-05 07:10

17 楼

re
楼主你去问老美吧，不过估计每人吊你

【在 c*******y 的大作中提到】

: 美国人不盲从？
: iphone的销量大部分靠老中？
: 日车的销量也靠老中？

s*32012-10-05 07:10

18 楼

你朋友圈子不行，建议换朋友

想当年我给我和我Lp换手机换成Wp，周围老中朋友就问，为啥不买IPhone，今年买
Minivan买了T
★ Sent from iPhone App: iReader Mitbbs Lite 7.56

【在 b********7 的大作中提到】

l*r2012-10-05 07:10

19 楼

手机无所谓，便宜，车子，就没必要搞个标新立异了，反正是谁用谁知道。

v*e2012-10-05 07:10

20 楼

感觉Nisson quest很赞

能。

【在 b********7 的大作中提到】

: T&C base应该就跟奥德赛的EXL配置几乎相等了。何况还有我最欣赏的stow n go功能。

l*r2012-10-05 07:10

21 楼

lz还是没有卖旧货的经验，等你要卖你的wp或你的车时，你就知道了。当然要是你钱
多，不在乎，那你想用啥，我想也不是个问题吧。

b*72012-10-05 07:10

22 楼

不卖旧货。车到时候直接trade in. 手机说真的，能卖几个钱？

【在 l*****r 的大作中提到】

: lz还是没有卖旧货的经验，等你要卖你的wp或你的车时，你就知道了。当然要是你钱
: 多，不在乎，那你想用啥，我想也不是个问题吧。

b*72012-10-05 07:10

23 楼

Quest运人不错，运货不行。

【在 v****e 的大作中提到】

: 感觉Nisson quest很赞
:
: 能。

l*r2012-10-05 07:10

24 楼

还是不缺钱的人。

【在 b********7 的大作中提到】

: 不卖旧货。车到时候直接trade in. 手机说真的，能卖几个钱？

j*52012-10-05 07:10

25 楼

说实话，T&C的sto'n'go其他日本minivan还真比不了
不知道现在日本车有没有，反正以前要想腾空间装大东西，一般minivan都要把座位拆
掉，只有TC可以者到地板下面

【在 h*d 的大作中提到】

: 不买iPhone也可以考虑android，为啥买Wp7?
: odyssey还是很不错的，买T&C图什么feature？
: 我自己刚买了个c-max，那个prius太肉，实在接受不了。

l*r2012-10-05 07:10

26 楼

这个也被专利了？

【在 j*********5 的大作中提到】

: 说实话，T&C的sto'n'go其他日本minivan还真比不了
: 不知道现在日本车有没有，反正以前要想腾空间装大东西，一般minivan都要把座位拆
: 掉，只有TC可以者到地板下面

b*72012-10-05 07:10

27 楼

这个本来就是Chrysler自己设计出来的。

【在 l*****r 的大作中提到】

: 这个也被专利了？

l*r2012-10-05 07:10

28 楼

别的车就没有？

【在 b********7 的大作中提到】

: 这个本来就是Chrysler自己设计出来的。

b*72012-10-05 07:10

29 楼

没有。

【在 l*****r 的大作中提到】

: 别的车就没有？

K*a2012-10-05 07:10

30 楼

艹，你们这帮人，害我以为自己跑车版去了……

t*y2012-10-05 07:10

31 楼

口碑就比T&C 稍微好一点点

【在 v****e 的大作中提到】

: 感觉Nisson quest很赞
:
: 能。

t*y2012-10-05 07:10

32 楼

看到一个老美评价美国老三的贴，写得挺好的：
Bought out by Diamler Benz (Mercedes) and sold, after crippling that company
. Bought out by the US government, and now Fiat.
Some say all Fords are crap. Some say all Chevys/GM are crap. Some say all
American cars are crap.
Nobody has an entire line-up of crap cars. But Dodge/Chrysler seems to have
the most.
The K-series of the late 80's early 90s ( a bunch of similar rectangular
vehicles that differed mostly in name only) were somewhat reliable,
mechanically. But everything was cheap. They looked cheap, even new. All the
fasteners were cheap, so bumpers, trim, and handles and crap fell off
constantly. The finish was cheap, so the paint faded and peeled almost
immediately. And they sucked on power.
But they were somewhat "hardy". Many people I know bought them for winter
cars. They were all front-wheel drive, all pretty much the same car,
regardless of what their emblem designated. So they worked well in the snow.
And used, they were cheaper than buying snow tires for their "real" cars.
You didn't mind crashing them, either.
The Caravan is heralded as the "first minivan". This is true only if you
have no interest in automotive history. The Morris Minor van comes to mind,
as well as the Austin minivan. Not to mention, of course the VW "microbus".
All of which predate the Caravan by at least 25 years.
The Caravan was made because Chrysler did not have a viable platform for a
proper station-wagon. Proper station wagons don't exist anymore, since
minivans took over. But a proper wagon is built of a sturdy RWD car. At the
time GM had at least 4. Ford had 2. Dodge had none.
A minivan is much cheaper to build than a RWD station wagon. It is also much
crappier and costs more to fix. But by the time people found this out,
everyone stopped making station wagons. The Dodge/Chrysler Caravan may be
the sole reason for the popularity of SUVs over the last 10 years, since
there was no other option for the MV users. They couldn't go back to full-
size wagons, cuz there are none.
The next few gens, late 90's to now, upped the style department. Although
many are tired of the Chrysler designs, that's only cuz we've seen them so
much. Most of their cars were hot sellers when they first came out. Their
appearances beat out almost anything offered by the other 2 Americans. Even
the now-boring-obsolete LHS was a great looking car compared to the GM/Ford
offerings of the same stature. The Neon, PT Cruiser, and Magnum series were
all very progressive as far as looks go. Not to mention the Viper and
Prowler.
Aside from the first original Taurus, Solstice, and new "retro-look" Mustang
and Camaro, Ford and GM had very few cars debut with "cutting edge
appearances"over the last 25 years. The appearance of the last few Corvettes
is still considered "uninspired" by most designers.
Unfortunately, the mechanics of these Chrysler vehicles were not as well
thought out as the looks. Magnum trucks are notorious for destroying
transmissions. Neons caught fire. Durangos lost their front ends. Let's not
forget rust. Our fleet PT has a completely rotted out subframe, due to
improper engineering/design, that allows water to pool up in certain areas.
Chrysler's biggest problem was trying to make affordable cars. It's not easy
to make an affordable car very good, not in this country. Also, the list of
features that people "expect" on a car has grown exponentially in the last
25 years.
AC, AM/FM, power steering, power brakes, automatic transmissions, power
windows and locks, were all "optional" not too long ago. Forget about GPS,
heat zones, heated seats, side-mirror defrost, ABS, airbags, etc.
People have come to expect rolling living-rooms;less concerned with quality,
more concerned with comfort...until it breaks. The more features you car
has , the less likely it is that they all work. Especially when every corner
imaginable was cut, just to pass the bare minimum legal safety requirements
and still be able to pay the enormous assembly cost. All of this to get the
car inexpensive enough to compete with Japanese imports.
Bottom line, the cars are built cheaply. Too cheap to warrant their cost.
But you can see it for yourself in the resale costs. The average used
Sebring can be had for well under $4000, regardless of how old it is or how
many miles. One has to wonder why anyone in the world would bother buying a
new one, with such rapid depreciation forecasted.

f*e2012-10-05 07:10

33 楼

quest可以。

【在 b********7 的大作中提到】

: 没有。

b*72012-10-05 07:10

34 楼

no. even its 3rs row cannot be folded into the floor. that's the major
drawback.

【在 f*****e 的大作中提到】

: quest可以。

f*e2012-10-05 07:10

35 楼

【在 b********7 的大作中提到】

: no. even its 3rs row cannot be folded into the floor. that's the major
: drawback.

f*e2012-10-05 07:10

36 楼

【在 b********7 的大作中提到】

: no. even its 3rs row cannot be folded into the floor. that's the major
: drawback.

h*d2012-10-05 07:10

37 楼

http://www.cars.com/go/advice/Story.jsp?section=top&subject=inn

能。
4. Fold-flat rear seats
Fold-flat seats in the Honda Odyssey.
Fold-flat seats in the Honda Odyssey.
Time frame: The first folding rear seats debuted in the '60s, but Honda's
fold-away seats in the late-90s Odyssey, later adopted by several automakers
, took the concept to a new level.
The innovation: Seats that tuck out of the way are so much easier to deal
with than those that have to be removed.
What we did before: Searched for a place in the garage to stow our van's
seats then risked a hernia by removing the heavy, awkward things.
Which cars have them: Most sedans have fold-down rear seats; most of the
best-selling minivans have the fold-flat third row.

【在 b********7 的大作中提到】

: T&C base应该就跟奥德赛的EXL配置几乎相等了。何况还有我最欣赏的stow n go功能。

j*52012-10-05 07:10

38 楼

这是说的第三排，stow n go是包括第二排，看ls的图片貌似quest也不错

【在 h*d 的大作中提到】

: http://www.cars.com/go/advice/Story.jsp?section=top&subject=inn
:
: 能。
: 4. Fold-flat rear seats
: Fold-flat seats in the Honda Odyssey.
: Fold-flat seats in the Honda Odyssey.
: Time frame: The first folding rear seats debuted in the '60s, but Honda's
: fold-away seats in the late-90s Odyssey, later adopted by several automakers
: , took the concept to a new level.
: The innovation: Seats that tuck out of the way are so much easier to deal