强调一下，讨论产品可以，严禁针对人 - 未名空间MITBBS历史存档

国际科技财经博客移民网络热点娱乐民生时事公众号

Redian新闻

>未名空间

>PDA - 掌中宝

强调一下，讨论产品可以，严禁针对人

强调一下，讨论产品可以，严禁针对人# PDA - 掌中宝

f*l2013-02-26 08:02

1 楼

还是contribution or authorship?
下面哪些可以算Media Report, 算几次呢？
2 F1000 for 1st authored paper
1 F1000 for nth authored paper
1 NewsRx for 1st authored paper
1 NewsRX for nth authored paper
1st authored paper在同期杂志作为Preview介绍
1st authored paper被Nature/Cell的Review引用
学校的通讯关于第一作者的报道被无数网站转载，内容一样

T*n2013-02-26 08:02

2 楼

请大家遵守版规。谢谢

c*g2013-02-26 08:02

3 楼

你说的不具体，没法回答
你说的这些我都有一些，都算contribution了，没算media report，仅作参考

【在 f**l 的大作中提到】

: 还是contribution or authorship?
: 下面哪些可以算Media Report, 算几次呢？
: 2 F1000 for 1st authored paper
: 1 F1000 for nth authored paper
: 1 NewsRx for 1st authored paper
: 1 NewsRX for nth authored paper
: 1st authored paper在同期杂志作为Preview介绍
: 1st authored paper被Nature/Cell的Review引用
: 学校的通讯关于第一作者的报道被无数网站转载，内容一样

C*d2013-02-26 08:02

4 楼

那给人随意下定义的，也算么？什么各种轮的？是算针对人了吧？

c*g2013-02-26 08:02

5 楼

提醒你一下啊，contribution是最难过的一项。

【在 f**l 的大作中提到】

T*n2013-02-26 08:02

6 楼

版规有解释

【在 C***d 的大作中提到】

: 那给人随意下定义的，也算么？什么各种轮的？是算针对人了吧？

s*s2013-02-26 08:02

7 楼

有啥特别经验没有啊？

【在 c******g 的大作中提到】

: 提醒你一下啊，contribution是最难过的一项。

k*02013-02-26 08:02

8 楼

上来就你不会用xxx呢，算对人么？

【在 T****n 的大作中提到】

: 请大家遵守版规。谢谢

c*g2013-02-26 08:02

9 楼

也没啥特别的经验。基本上班上都讨论过了。吧能想到的都拿来支持一下

【在 s**********s 的大作中提到】

: 有啥特别经验没有啊？

T*n2013-02-26 08:02

10 楼

请大家遵守版规。谢谢

L*r2013-02-26 08:02

11 楼

2 F1000 for 1st authored paper
1 F1000 for nth authored paper
1 NewsRx for 1st authored paper
1 NewsRX for nth authored paper
1st authored paper在同期杂志作为Preview介绍
1st authored paper被Nature/Cell的Review引用
If you have a good number of reviews (judge others), you can put these into
contribution.
If you only have authorship and contribution to file an EB1A, you can use
these as media report. Just give it a try.
Zac Liu's webpage saying these are discussing your work, not yourself,
therefore are not media report is totally MISLEADING!
I know at least two cases using F1000, and some discussion from review
papers as media report and passed with ease. The only thing is you have to
be the first author.

C*d2013-02-26 08:02

12 楼

那给人随意下定义的，也算么？什么各种轮的？是算针对人了吧？

c*g2013-02-26 08:02

13 楼

"I know at least two cases using F1000, and some discussion from review
papers as media report and passed with ease. The only thing is you have to
be the first author."
这个只是运气好或是人品好，碰到不怎么懂的IO了。或是IO那天心情好。
我觉得在这点上，律师是对的。“discussing your work, not yourself,
therefore are not media report”

into
If you only have authorship and contribution to file an EB1A, you can use
these as media report. Just give it a try.
Zac Liu's webpage saying these are discussing your work, not yourself,
therefore are not media report is totally MISLEADING!
I know at least two cases using F1000, and some discussion from review
papers as media report and passed with ease. The only thing is you have to
be the first author.

【在 L******r 的大作中提到】

: 2 F1000 for 1st authored paper
: 1 F1000 for nth authored paper
: 1 NewsRx for 1st authored paper
: 1 NewsRX for nth authored paper
: 1st authored paper在同期杂志作为Preview介绍
: 1st authored paper被Nature/Cell的Review引用
: If you have a good number of reviews (judge others), you can put these into
: contribution.
: If you only have authorship and contribution to file an EB1A, you can use
: these as media report. Just give it a try.

T*n2013-02-26 08:02

14 楼

版规有解释

【在 C***d 的大作中提到】

: 那给人随意下定义的，也算么？什么各种轮的？是算针对人了吧？

i*l2013-02-26 08:02

15 楼

这个，如果不介绍你的工作，怎么去介绍你？

【在 c******g 的大作中提到】

: "I know at least two cases using F1000, and some discussion from review
: papers as media report and passed with ease. The only thing is you have to
: be the first author."
: 这个只是运气好或是人品好，碰到不怎么懂的IO了。或是IO那天心情好。
: 我觉得在这点上，律师是对的。“discussing your work, not yourself,
: therefore are not media report”
:
: into
: If you only have authorship and contribution to file an EB1A, you can use
: these as media report. Just give it a try.

k*02013-02-26 08:02

16 楼

上来就你不会用xxx呢，算对人么？

【在 T****n 的大作中提到】

: 请大家遵守版规。谢谢

T*y2013-02-26 08:02

17 楼

I guess that the IOs want to see something that "this XXX person is an
expert in YYY field, and s/he has published ZZZ papers, which made AAA
contributions", rather than something that "This paper (with or without
author names) proposed a new XXX, which is potentially YYY....".

【在 i***l 的大作中提到】

: 这个，如果不介绍你的工作，怎么去介绍你？

z*42013-02-26 08:02

18 楼

呵呵没关系我就当看笑话

i*h2013-02-26 08:02

19 楼

版规其实就一条
版务对版规有绝对解释权和执行权

【在 z******4 的大作中提到】

: 呵呵没关系我就当看笑话