今天收到RＦE了，承认了review and publication。contribution没有过。
现在把信的细节贴这儿，希望兄弟姐妹给出点主意。谢谢了先。
递了6封推荐信，officer把其中4封都列出来了，因为其中有“could” and "potency""show
potential in future research" (其中2封是推荐人自己加的，2封是我写的)
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not
show that the beneficiary's contributions are considered to be of major
significance in the filed of endeavor. While the beneficiary's research
has received some recognition, and is no doubt of value, given that a
fundamental role of research is the development of new methods, it does
not follow that every researcher who performs original research has
inherently made a contribution of major significance to the field as a
whole. The letters describe how the beneficiary's work potentially
"could lead to enhanced......", or "can potentially lead to discovery of
novel classed of drugs", or "show potential in future research", rather
than describing results already realized that would be indicative of
major contributions to the field.
The record also demonstrates that the beneficiary's work has received
some attention and been moderately cited, and contains elaborate self-
generated charts, lists and diagrams to emphasize that this citation
record is indicative of major contributions to the field（看来还是看了油灯图
啥的）. However, the major significance of the beneficiary's work must be
demonstrated by preexisting, independent and objiective evidence(这些表格都是基于网页上做的，在exhibit 里都是用的网页上的客观材料，因太多我就做了些表格 ). And
while the beneficiary has published in prominent journals, the record
does not demonstrate that every work appearing in these publications in
these journals is a major contribution to the field.
Possible evidence may include but is not liimited to:
a:Contracts with companies using the beneficiary's products
b: Licensed technology being used by others; and
c: Patents currently being utilized and shown to be significant to the
field （这三项都没有，怎么办呢？）
１. 请问这是ＲＦＥ模板吗？
２. 是否再要几封推荐信就可以了？
３.他说ｍｅｔ的那两项就不用提了吗，我有２篇刚刚被接受的文章和新的１０＋ｒｅｖｉｅｗ
请大家给出出主意，好回复吗？刚看到悲剧的那位的情况，有点担心。
--------------------------------------------------------
昨天是第15天，网上更新及email通知说是ref了。
还不知道具体情况。
用请律师吗？有点不自信了。
附背景:
生物，文章16（包括会议摘要），一篇三作Nature，一篇6分左右的一作，主要集中说
了这两个贡献。review40+，但其中两个是中文杂志，是其中一个on board.另一个是英
国的垃圾杂志。推荐信6封（4封独立），一英国，一澳大利亚，一以色列，三来自美国
，其中有一个人是院士。多数是引用这两篇文章的人。引用不多，110+。
刚有两篇一作被接受（影响因子分别15和4.5左右）。引用多了些，review多了些。
等拿到ref letter 后还要请各位给出点主意。
