乐视影迷俱乐部到底怎么装在乐视盒子上# PDA - 掌中宝
b*d
1 楼
去年12月的EB1A和一月的NIW，四月中pp，NIW过，EB1A被RFE。
Review 过，authorship过。contribution没过。
领域：工程。
publication：8。
Citation：48， 42 independent
我们把citation放到publication 里去了，是不是要移到contribution里，以证明widely cited？
弱case，不知道能不能死马当作活马医。
最近带孩子，找工作，忙的顾不上来这里update。以前工作的工作，学习的学习，很稳定，没有想绿卡的事，现在都要找工作，才知道绿卡重要。
RFE内容如下：
petitioner has provided:
1. Letters from peers and colleagues.
2. Evidence of reports on the beneficiary's projects.
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show that the beneficiary's contributions are considered to be of major significance in the field of endeavor. To assist in determinning whether the beneficiary's contributions are original and of major significance in the field, the petitioner may submit:
1.Objection documentary
2.Documentary evidence
3.Testimony or supporting letter
4.widedly cited
5.work being implemented by others.
a.
b.
c.
信的最后还说：
Additionally, meeting the minimum regulatory criteria outlined above, along will not establish eligibility for the E11 immigrant classfication,. Any evidence aubmitted in responde to this request, should also articulate how the evidence establishes that the beneficiary possesses the required high level of expertise for the E11 immigrant classification.
........
这是不是也说明totallity不行？
Review 过，authorship过。contribution没过。
领域：工程。
publication：8。
Citation：48， 42 independent
我们把citation放到publication 里去了，是不是要移到contribution里，以证明widely cited？
弱case，不知道能不能死马当作活马医。
最近带孩子，找工作，忙的顾不上来这里update。以前工作的工作，学习的学习，很稳定，没有想绿卡的事，现在都要找工作，才知道绿卡重要。
RFE内容如下：
petitioner has provided:
1. Letters from peers and colleagues.
2. Evidence of reports on the beneficiary's projects.
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show that the beneficiary's contributions are considered to be of major significance in the field of endeavor. To assist in determinning whether the beneficiary's contributions are original and of major significance in the field, the petitioner may submit:
1.Objection documentary
2.Documentary evidence
3.Testimony or supporting letter
4.widedly cited
5.work being implemented by others.
a.
b.
c.
信的最后还说：
Additionally, meeting the minimum regulatory criteria outlined above, along will not establish eligibility for the E11 immigrant classfication,. Any evidence aubmitted in responde to this request, should also articulate how the evidence establishes that the beneficiary possesses the required high level of expertise for the E11 immigrant classification.
........
这是不是也说明totallity不行？
