My personal opinion is not to submit unless you have solid data for all three aims of your R01. You can submit with two aims with data but you are chancing on not getting discussed. With the one resubmission only, you should always go in when you are ready. The discussed summary statement is a lot more detail and the PO is usually also willing to share what's been said in the study section.
【在 A******y 的大作中提到】 : My personal opinion is not to submit unless you have solid data for all : three aims of your R01. You can submit with two aims with data but you are : chancing on not getting discussed. With the one resubmission only, you : should always go in when you are ready. The discussed summary statement is : a lot more detail and the PO is usually also willing to share what's been : said in the study section.
DBA -> faculty if you are a good researcher type student with industry experience
m*h
47 楼
已经非常非常晚了,偶马上就睡去了
【在 d******g 的大作中提到】 : 最近赋闲在家,睡的比较晚。
A*y
48 楼
I agree with above. Don't apply for R21 (unless is an RFA specific for new investigators)!!! I was in the SFN national meeting NIH question and answer section, all NIH POs told the new investigators not to apply for R21. You know what's funny, a junior PI said his seniors told him to try R21 and said NIH POs are wrong during the Q&A section. I guess that PI is in the wrong business and the greatest mistakes is listening to wrong advises. I told you the reason why a new PI should not apply for R21: 1. In R21 study section, your grant is not reviewed with other new PIs, all R21s are reviewed together. In R01, NIH breaks into two groups: senior PIs and new PIs even before the study section read the grants. 2. R21 payline is a lot lower than R01. 3. R21 is only two years and non-renewable. But but, I don't need preliminary data for R21...that's a lie...because everyone applied for R21 have preliminary data. If you ever going to get funded, you need preliminary data...a lot of preliminary data. Because of these reasons, if you R21 got funded as a new PI...your grant is probably good enough for R01 except you should kick yourself for getting a two year grant instead of 5 year one.
【在 h*****w 的大作中提到】 : 我不是交RO1, 是R21或者R41 : 新方向我不敢弄RO1,我也知道要数据做出来才行,不过按照目前的进度至少要2年以上才 : 比较有把握(手下还是没得力的人). : : are : is
是的,我是early career and new investigator 我r21申请过两次都是not discussed r01两次都至少有分数 再也不弄r21了
new answer You said wrong ★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 8.1
【在 A******y 的大作中提到】 : I agree with above. Don't apply for R21 (unless is an RFA specific for new : investigators)!!! I was in the SFN national meeting NIH question and answer : section, all NIH POs told the new investigators not to apply for R21. You : know what's funny, a junior PI said his seniors told him to try R21 and said : NIH POs are wrong during the Q&A section. I guess that PI is in the wrong : business and the greatest mistakes is listening to wrong advises. : I told you the reason why a new PI should not apply for R21: : 1. In R21 study section, your grant is not reviewed with other new PIs, all : R21s are reviewed together. In R01, NIH breaks into two groups: senior PIs : and new PIs even before the study section read the grants.
s*r
52 楼
这肯定不是猫啊,貌似猫科动物的都是那种一条。这像是某种草食动物, 是不是鹿?
【在 m***h 的大作中提到】 : 野猫吧
d*y
53 楼
云老师做啥方向? 感觉和我做一样方向。上次听你说投了CBET的career.
【在 h*****w 的大作中提到】 : 我不是交RO1, 是R21或者R41 : 新方向我不敢弄RO1,我也知道要数据做出来才行,不过按照目前的进度至少要2年以上才 : 比较有把握(手下还是没得力的人). : : are : is