新人首奔猫儿子照片～～～～～啦啦啦～～～～# pets - 心有所宠
S*b
1 楼
june 27, pp nsc, eb1a , 今天收到 intends to deny in mail (30天答复) 求大家
出出主意
第一条是说没有offer letter, 这个应该好弄
关键是后边的,请大家指点一下 这是说不承认review么？ 该怎么应对呀 我的背景cs
, review了40篇(10个杂志 10个会议)的水平不等的paper 有一个推荐先是associate
editor的 还有一个 associate editor的证明信
请问在回复这个 intend of deny 的时候 还应该提供什么材料呢？之前已经提供的材
料还要重新交么，还是只需要交补充材料？ 之前已经用过的强调review的推荐信 还
能用在这个的答复吗？ 多谢大家
USCIS has determined that the petitioner has provided sufficient
documentation to establish the beneficiary has met the following regulatory
criteria:
老三样
As the petitioner has submitted evidence to demonstrate the beneficiary has
met at least 3 of the 10 , USCIS must now examine the evidence presented in
its entirety to make an initial final merits determination, of whether or
not the petitioner,****
Establishing eligibility for the high level of expertise required for the
E11 immigrant classification is based on the beneficiary possessing:
1. Sustained national or international acclaim
a. *****
2. achievements that have been recognized in the field of expertise,
indicating that the beneficiary is one of that small percentage who has
risen to the very top of the field of endeavor.
The evidence indicates the petitioner has conducted peer reviews. With
regards to the petitioner's work as a peer reviewer, the fact that respected
scientific journals and organizations are peer-reviewed and receive
hundreds of manuscripts for potential publication that must be peer-reviewed
cannot be ignored. It is a logical conclusion that scientific journals must
reply on many scientists to review these manuscripts, make this a routine
activity for scientists. Therefore, peer-review is not, by itself,
indicative of, or consistent with being in the very top of a field or
sustained national or international acclaim. Without evidence that sets the
petitioner apart from others in the field it cannot be concluded that this
evidence reflects the petitioner is in the very top of the field or has
sustained national or international acclaim.
出出主意
第一条是说没有offer letter, 这个应该好弄
关键是后边的,请大家指点一下 这是说不承认review么？ 该怎么应对呀 我的背景cs
, review了40篇(10个杂志 10个会议)的水平不等的paper 有一个推荐先是associate
editor的 还有一个 associate editor的证明信
请问在回复这个 intend of deny 的时候 还应该提供什么材料呢？之前已经提供的材
料还要重新交么，还是只需要交补充材料？ 之前已经用过的强调review的推荐信 还
能用在这个的答复吗？ 多谢大家
USCIS has determined that the petitioner has provided sufficient
documentation to establish the beneficiary has met the following regulatory
criteria:
老三样
As the petitioner has submitted evidence to demonstrate the beneficiary has
met at least 3 of the 10 , USCIS must now examine the evidence presented in
its entirety to make an initial final merits determination, of whether or
not the petitioner,****
Establishing eligibility for the high level of expertise required for the
E11 immigrant classification is based on the beneficiary possessing:
1. Sustained national or international acclaim
a. *****
2. achievements that have been recognized in the field of expertise,
indicating that the beneficiary is one of that small percentage who has
risen to the very top of the field of endeavor.
The evidence indicates the petitioner has conducted peer reviews. With
regards to the petitioner's work as a peer reviewer, the fact that respected
scientific journals and organizations are peer-reviewed and receive
hundreds of manuscripts for potential publication that must be peer-reviewed
cannot be ignored. It is a logical conclusion that scientific journals must
reply on many scientists to review these manuscripts, make this a routine
activity for scientists. Therefore, peer-review is not, by itself,
indicative of, or consistent with being in the very top of a field or
sustained national or international acclaim. Without evidence that sets the
petitioner apart from others in the field it cannot be concluded that this
evidence reflects the petitioner is in the very top of the field or has
sustained national or international acclaim.
