avatar
p*j
1
二手价格多少是deal呢,这个镜头walk around似乎还不错。
avatar
a*w
2
i saw there was a $170 in craigslist
avatar
W*t
3
新的多少钱可以下手呢?

【在 a******w 的大作中提到】
: i saw there was a $170 in craigslist
avatar
k*r
4
18-200mm贵很多啊,三倍的价钱?除了range,成像有差那么多吗?
avatar
p*j
5
18-200成像据说更差一些,但是200和105还是差不少的。

【在 k***r 的大作中提到】
: 18-200mm贵很多啊,三倍的价钱?除了range,成像有差那么多吗?
avatar
q*3
6
长焦端差距其实不是很大,200比105 放大率大不到哪去,感觉还是105 超值

【在 p***j 的大作中提到】
: 18-200成像据说更差一些,但是200和105还是差不少的。
avatar
p*j
7

~~~~~~~~~do not aglee ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~aglee

【在 q***3 的大作中提到】
: 长焦端差距其实不是很大,200比105 放大率大不到哪去,感觉还是105 超值
avatar
l*C
8
像素够的话回来自己切一下,也差不太多

【在 q***3 的大作中提到】
: 长焦端差距其实不是很大,200比105 放大率大不到哪去,感觉还是105 超值
avatar
k*r
9
Ken Rockwell 不同意这个说法,呵呵。His words:
The photos are nice and sharp most of the time,
but if you're looking closely, the 18-105mm is
Nikon's fuzziest lens in the corners at 18mm.
Even the $100 18-55mm is better.... For not much
more, I could get the superior metal-mount 16-85mm
VR or 18-200mm VR instead, either of which is also
superior to the 18-105mm.

【在 p***j 的大作中提到】
: 18-200成像据说更差一些,但是200和105还是差不少的。
avatar
s*x
10
Some of Ken's info doesn't seem to be correct. 18-105 is shaper than 18-200
in its range, and also shaper than 18-55 VR as well. The peformance/price
rate is much better than 18-200.

【在 k***r 的大作中提到】
: Ken Rockwell 不同意这个说法,呵呵。His words:
: The photos are nice and sharp most of the time,
: but if you're looking closely, the 18-105mm is
: Nikon's fuzziest lens in the corners at 18mm.
: Even the $100 18-55mm is better.... For not much
: more, I could get the superior metal-mount 16-85mm
: VR or 18-200mm VR instead, either of which is also
: superior to the 18-105mm.

avatar
b*8
11
Though I disagree with Ken's assessment (he may have gotten a bad sample), I
do have used both 18-105VR and 18-200VR extensively. I still keep my 18-
200VR because there's really nothing to replace it. 18-105VR is OK, but
nothing stands out. It's usually sell about $200-$250 from D90 kit buyers
who upgraded to 18-200.
Frankly, I'd rather use 18-55VR cause from 55-105, the differences aren't
very significant especially when the open aperture is small...

200

【在 s****x 的大作中提到】
: Some of Ken's info doesn't seem to be correct. 18-105 is shaper than 18-200
: in its range, and also shaper than 18-55 VR as well. The peformance/price
: rate is much better than 18-200.

相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。