g*z
5 楼
据说有个Tokina f/2.8 11-16mm似乎更好
C*I
16 楼
I got a Sigma 17-50mm F2.8 $669
It is very good.
Here is some review for that lens:
http://www.lenstip.com/256.11Lens_reviewSigma_1750_mm_f_2.8_EX_DC_OS_HSM_Summary.html
In the frame centre the Sigma behaves better than more expensive
constructions of Canon and Nikon. At the edge it is worse than the Nikkor
but it can compete on equal terms with the Canon. In fact it doesn’t lag
behind the competitors in any category and in some it fares definitely
better. Sigma lately has started to emphasize the fact that its aim is not
only to produce cheap and worse substitutes of brand name lenses but also to
reach a similar price-quality segment as its brand name competitors. The
newest models, like the 1.4/50 or the Sigma 17-50 mm f/2.8 tested here, are
perfect examples of this strategy.
The Sigma 17–50 mm is not a flawless device but neither are so its most
serious competitors which are more expensive. The Nikkor overall seems to be
an optically better lens but it is much more pricey than the Sigma and
doesn’t feature image stabilization. The optics of the Sigma and the Canon
are very similar – both boast silent and quick autofocus mechanism and
stabilization. Sigma’s advantage consists of a better warranty and a bit
lower price
It is very good.
Here is some review for that lens:
http://www.lenstip.com/256.11Lens_reviewSigma_1750_mm_f_2.8_EX_DC_OS_HSM_Summary.html
In the frame centre the Sigma behaves better than more expensive
constructions of Canon and Nikon. At the edge it is worse than the Nikkor
but it can compete on equal terms with the Canon. In fact it doesn’t lag
behind the competitors in any category and in some it fares definitely
better. Sigma lately has started to emphasize the fact that its aim is not
only to produce cheap and worse substitutes of brand name lenses but also to
reach a similar price-quality segment as its brand name competitors. The
newest models, like the 1.4/50 or the Sigma 17-50 mm f/2.8 tested here, are
perfect examples of this strategy.
The Sigma 17–50 mm is not a flawless device but neither are so its most
serious competitors which are more expensive. The Nikkor overall seems to be
an optically better lens but it is much more pricey than the Sigma and
doesn’t feature image stabilization. The optics of the Sigma and the Canon
are very similar – both boast silent and quick autofocus mechanism and
stabilization. Sigma’s advantage consists of a better warranty and a bit
lower price
相关阅读
彻底糊涂了,D3x上的16-35 VR和14-24的pk.[合集] 黑白片应该怎么测光?50mm比较征文活动总结,投票即将开始看了一部电影后对摄影,Film,暗房的疑问(多图)Contax Zeiss 24-85mm N converted by Conurus[版务]关于转帖文章的建议和奖励办法benro团购第三波55mm焦段,F5.6 17 VS 18谁说无敌兔不能打鸟?有图有真相Nikon Coolscan系列底扫历史、关键指标及购买建议申请PhotoGear版版主 (转载)百诺C-358M8的短中柱一些photoforum版的史前史(中) (转载)[原创]魏挲楠的新相机,送给万能斧头版[征文]09年新器材-Sigma 17-70, xxh, and 580 ex ii色彩管理经验分享 1[合集] 350D MOD 过程[征文]回顾2009新器材-偶遇Contax G不是所有的感动都能用照片记录...C+的朋友re