研究了一下,还是得慎用这个verticalnews。就算是放在contribution里,也要有被 RFE的心理准备。 目前看来只有一段verticalnews自我陈述里面的话可以用来强调其意义。而且这段话本 身也算是引用别的媒体对它的评价。不过这段话是在很长很长的一个说明里面摘出来的 。我不知道如何在几十页的说明里面把这段话给合理地标注出来给IO看。 下面就是那段话: VerticalNews is a top news source in science and technology. VerticalNews distribution reaches a global audience that spans more than 50 countries. VerticalNews also is available at LexisNexis, Gale, ProQuest, Factiva, Dialog, Thomson Reuters, NewsEdge, and The Wall Street Journal Professional Editon. VerticalNews was commented by USA Today, “...promote[s] international understanding;” by Forbes, “offer[s] readers both a broad overview and an insider’s knowledge;” and by CNBC, “readers stay on top of the technology that is important to them and makes their business successful.” 这里有一个在RFE里强调VerticalNews的案例,但是是2010年的,很久远了... http://www.mitbbs.com/bbsann2/life.faq/Immigration/D13219240772