j*i
3 楼
榆木疙瘩
n*b
4 楼
可能还是对焦的区别吧。
【在 x***k 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/wingmanzero/10222854
【在 x***k 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/wingmanzero/10222854
z*n
6 楼
为啥紫边差这么多?什么原理?
x*0
8 楼
眼睛好大啊
【在 x***k 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/wingmanzero/10222854
【在 x***k 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/wingmanzero/10222854
x*c
10 楼
wait till D3s drops down to 2k
u*q
19 楼
为什么一定要木头的?塑料的成吗?
S*M
20 楼
这个化妆太猛了,JPG直出,脸上一点texture都没有
【在 x***k 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/wingmanzero/10222854
【在 x***k 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: http://www.wretch.cc/blog/wingmanzero/10222854
b*n
22 楼
I believe the camera body really make difference when you are using lens
with aperture as large as 1.4 or larger. A lot of people say 85/1.4D is not
sharp at 1.4. I agree with that when I used D300/D700. After I started using
D3 with it, I find I can easily get very sharp image at 1.4.
with aperture as large as 1.4 or larger. A lot of people say 85/1.4D is not
sharp at 1.4. I agree with that when I used D300/D700. After I started using
D3 with it, I find I can easily get very sharp image at 1.4.
z*n
24 楼
not
using
D300/D700的时候跑焦了?D700和D3理论上对焦,测光,CMOS都是一套,莫非调教的不
同?
【在 b*********n 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: I believe the camera body really make difference when you are using lens
: with aperture as large as 1.4 or larger. A lot of people say 85/1.4D is not
: sharp at 1.4. I agree with that when I used D300/D700. After I started using
: D3 with it, I find I can easily get very sharp image at 1.4.
C*e
25 楼
这菜板是要买个好的贵的100以上的,还是一般的20左右的就没啥差别?
还有厚度有啥说道不?
还有厚度有啥说道不?
C*e
29 楼
我家有个玻璃的菜板,切东西,老吓人了,刀切下去接触到菜板的声音,总让人心跟着
颤一下。只好切水果用了,用的少。
颤一下。只好切水果用了,用的少。
h*a
30 楼
maybe, the smaller f number, the more shallow of depth of field, and so
focus needs more precision, and therefore whatever body has better focusing
system (D3?) will be able to make it correctly focused and so sharper?
not
using
【在 b*********n 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: I believe the camera body really make difference when you are using lens
: with aperture as large as 1.4 or larger. A lot of people say 85/1.4D is not
: sharp at 1.4. I agree with that when I used D300/D700. After I started using
: D3 with it, I find I can easily get very sharp image at 1.4.
focus needs more precision, and therefore whatever body has better focusing
system (D3?) will be able to make it correctly focused and so sharper?
not
using
【在 b*********n 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: I believe the camera body really make difference when you are using lens
: with aperture as large as 1.4 or larger. A lot of people say 85/1.4D is not
: sharp at 1.4. I agree with that when I used D300/D700. After I started using
: D3 with it, I find I can easily get very sharp image at 1.4.
c*o
37 楼
竹子的或者木头的,其他的都不成吧
s*d
39 楼
竹子的干净一些,也耐用一些。
不过剁骨头我不敢用。
不过剁骨头我不敢用。
c*y
48 楼
知名铁丝可不这么认为
"The AF of the D700 is as fast as the AF of the D3. I tested this only with
AF-S lenses so I can't comment on non AF-S lenses. The module of the D700 is
the same as the one of the D3. The D300 uses another modue.
BW the different voltages of the batteries don't say anything, because the
electronics "run" with the same voltage in all three cameras.
"The AF of the D700 is as fast as the AF of the D3. I tested this only with
AF-S lenses so I can't comment on non AF-S lenses. The module of the D700 is
the same as the one of the D3. The D300 uses another modue.
BW the different voltages of the batteries don't say anything, because the
electronics "run" with the same voltage in all three cameras.
b*n
50 楼
He is probably true on AFS lens, but for non-afs lens I can tell the
difference with my personal experience.
with
is
【在 c********y 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 知名铁丝可不这么认为
: "The AF of the D700 is as fast as the AF of the D3. I tested this only with
: AF-S lenses so I can't comment on non AF-S lenses. The module of the D700 is
: the same as the one of the D3. The D300 uses another modue.
: BW the different voltages of the batteries don't say anything, because the
: electronics "run" with the same voltage in all three cameras.
difference with my personal experience.
with
is
【在 c********y 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 知名铁丝可不这么认为
: "The AF of the D700 is as fast as the AF of the D3. I tested this only with
: AF-S lenses so I can't comment on non AF-S lenses. The module of the D700 is
: the same as the one of the D3. The D300 uses another modue.
: BW the different voltages of the batteries don't say anything, because the
: electronics "run" with the same voltage in all three cameras.
z*n
51 楼
with
is
这得拆开看看对焦马达一样不一样才行了。电压确实不能100%说明问题。
【在 c********y 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 知名铁丝可不这么认为
: "The AF of the D700 is as fast as the AF of the D3. I tested this only with
: AF-S lenses so I can't comment on non AF-S lenses. The module of the D700 is
: the same as the one of the D3. The D300 uses another modue.
: BW the different voltages of the batteries don't say anything, because the
: electronics "run" with the same voltage in all three cameras.
n*b
53 楼
一个衍生出来的疑问,算DOF的时候,拿85mm/1.4来说,
Subject distance 10 ft
Depth of field 0.35 ft
这个0.35 ft是按Circle of confusion = 0.03mm算出来的。对于看像素的今天,这个0
.03是不是过时了?
Subject distance 10 ft
Depth of field 0.35 ft
这个0.35 ft是按Circle of confusion = 0.03mm算出来的。对于看像素的今天,这个0
.03是不是过时了?
相关阅读
万佛,MSN被阻止,手机又收不到验证码,如何是好有佛爷知道university of connecticut 的健康中心的mail list?佳能造无敌兔的都是美女工人啊版上有 Atrix 4G 已经到手的没?变化太大了,只能网上买了gordy strap万佛啊,推荐个北京冲洗店吧decent 5dmk2的价格2010年5月的Canon 70-200mm F4/L $520咋样柯达新Portra 160发布哪位还有panny 的EPP帐号么?这就是蓝冰么?已经block Canda了,为什么Canda的病人还能bid看你们说猫打炮,其实有一个问题从我小时候一直困扰着我发十个包子答谢smug兄卖我扫描仪X100 Samples from DP有没有人share个amazon prime acct?220744538928李天乐本科是清华的?关于M43的一些看法