结论是,"As for the Canon Mark III, the 22MP sensor is not that different when compared to the Mark II." 比我以前猜想的还糟糕,感情贱C就只是把1D的对焦下放。至于sensor,直接就抄了5D2 的,然后提价$1k卖吴三桂。四年了,贱C居然还用同一块sensor来忽悠人。
【在 T********r 的大作中提到】 : 结论是,"As for the Canon Mark III, the 22MP sensor is not that different : when compared to the Mark II." : 比我以前猜想的还糟糕,感情贱C就只是把1D的对焦下放。至于sensor,直接就抄了5D2 : 的,然后提价$1k卖吴三桂。四年了,贱C居然还用同一块sensor来忽悠人。
C*c
15 楼
铁丝现在准备入个D3100顶一阵..
【在 x5 的大作中提到】 : 铁丝悲愤的声音。。。。
d*0
16 楼
两家竞争得越激烈,对用户越有好处。老尼也该改善一下对焦了。老的对焦系统精度似 乎已经跟不上像素了。
5D2
【在 T********r 的大作中提到】 : 结论是,"As for the Canon Mark III, the 22MP sensor is not that different : when compared to the Mark II." : 比我以前猜想的还糟糕,感情贱C就只是把1D的对焦下放。至于sensor,直接就抄了5D2 : 的,然后提价$1k卖吴三桂。四年了,贱C居然还用同一块sensor来忽悠人。
【在 T********r 的大作中提到】 : 结论是,"As for the Canon Mark III, the 22MP sensor is not that different : when compared to the Mark II." : 比我以前猜想的还糟糕,感情贱C就只是把1D的对焦下放。至于sensor,直接就抄了5D2 : 的,然后提价$1k卖吴三桂。四年了,贱C居然还用同一块sensor来忽悠人。
x5
19 楼
不奇怪吧
5D2
【在 T********r 的大作中提到】 : 结论是,"As for the Canon Mark III, the 22MP sensor is not that different : when compared to the Mark II." : 比我以前猜想的还糟糕,感情贱C就只是把1D的对焦下放。至于sensor,直接就抄了5D2 : 的,然后提价$1k卖吴三桂。四年了,贱C居然还用同一块sensor来忽悠人。
LLoyd的结论和DxOMark的结论看起来也支持这一点。 “The bottom line for me in this first batch of images is that the Canon 5D Mark III image quality leaves me feeling bored. Adding in the +$1000 price increase, I’m left scratching my head for what this means— if I were cynical, I’d say that Canon is milking the market with a marginally better sensor than the 5DM2 at a much higher price. The 5DM3 images look improved over the 5DM2 in some ways but I don’t exactly feel compelled to trade up. Now DxOMark has published its DxOMark lab tests on the 5D Mark III sensor, compared to the 5D Mark II. My eyes had seen right away what the DxO numbers indicate in a quantified way: the 5DM3 has a marginally better sensor than the 5DM2, and neither can hold a candle to the Nikon D800.“
【在 T********r 的大作中提到】 : LLoyd的结论和DxOMark的结论看起来也支持这一点。 : “The bottom line for me in this first batch of images is that the Canon 5D : Mark III image quality leaves me feeling bored. Adding in the +$1000 price : increase, I’m left scratching my head for what this means— if I were : cynical, I’d say that Canon is milking the market with a marginally better : sensor than the 5DM2 at a much higher price. The 5DM3 images look improved : over the 5DM2 in some ways but I don’t exactly feel compelled to trade up. : Now DxOMark has published its DxOMark lab tests on the 5D Mark III sensor, : compared to the 5D Mark II. My eyes had seen right away what the DxO numbers : indicate in a quantified way: the 5DM3 has a marginally better sensor than
【在 T********r 的大作中提到】 : 结论是,"As for the Canon Mark III, the 22MP sensor is not that different : when compared to the Mark II." : 比我以前猜想的还糟糕,感情贱C就只是把1D的对焦下放。至于sensor,直接就抄了5D2 : 的,然后提价$1k卖吴三桂。四年了,贱C居然还用同一块sensor来忽悠人。
这个是dpreview对DXO测ISO的解释: "However, please do not take the DxO 'ISO' figures to mean Olympus is mis- representing ISO - that's not what those figures show. In effect what they show is how each company (totally legitimately within the ISO standard), chooses to expose their sensors. A lower figure means they're trying to capture more highlights, at the expense of noise - a higher figure suggests they're doing the opposite. It does not mean one is under or over-rating ISO. ISO as it's marked on cameras is essentially about metering - it defines what shutter speed and aperture are required to give a particular output brightness from a specific scene brightness. That isn't what DxO is measuring, so differences between two figures cannot be used as evidence that either is somehow incorrect."