你干脆建个review网站, 把你样片一贴, 再写点评论, 来"证伪"吧 我选镜头还在以看靠谱的review网站为主 S+ 16-50mm http://www.photozone.de/sony_nex/842-sony1650f3556oss Optical Quality: "The Sony E 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS broke a couple of records but unfortunately not in the positive sense....The inclusion of a 16mm looks highly attractive on paper but the truth is that the quality is insufficient here - at least on Sony's 24 megapixel sensor. The resolution improves the more you zoom out and the lens is actually pretty good in the medium to upper range. Thus we feel that Sony was somewhat too aggressive here. " S+16-70mm http://www.photozone.de/sony_nex/901-sony1670f4oss Optical Quality: "Unfortunately I only verified the center performance of the lens at the time which is obviously great. Upon checking the results my disappointment was high though. Sony/Zeiss did many things right - range, build quality, image stabilization but optical quality is not part of the list. Yes, the center quality is outstanding but the corners are often mediocre or even dismal. ... However, the high mechanical qualities doesn't overshadow the fact that this Zeiss lens is both heavily overpriced and below average by today's standards. As such we can only conclude ... not recommended." O+ 12-40mm http://www.photozone.de/m43/862_oly1240 Optical Quality: to "The optical quality of this standard zoom is impressive, with an extremely sharp centre zone whereas the border and corner resolution is very good. This perception is once more leveraged by the low amount of lateral CAs. Furthermore the distortion level is fine from a user perspective, but technically it relies on a drastic amount of auto-correction by the system or a RAW-converter - especially at 12mm wide-open. The quality of the bokeh is not overly impressive but still acceptable for a zoom lens. " P+ 12-35mm http://www.photozone.de/m43/766_pana1235f28 Optical Quality: to "The lens is, undoubtedly, a good one but not stellar. It is chili-sharp in the image center but the border region isn't quite on this level in the lower focal length range. At 35mm it is more impressive with very sharp results across the image field. "
【在 e**n 的大作中提到】 : 你干脆建个review网站, 把你样片一贴, 再写点评论, 来"证伪"吧 : 我选镜头还在以看靠谱的review网站为主 : S+ 16-50mm : http://www.photozone.de/sony_nex/842-sony1650f3556oss : Optical Quality: : "The Sony E 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS broke a couple of records but : unfortunately not in the positive sense....The inclusion of a 16mm looks : highly attractive on paper but the truth is that the quality is insufficient : here - at least on Sony's 24 megapixel sensor. The resolution improves the : more you zoom out and the lens is actually pretty good in the medium to