D*3
3 楼
虽然我们有拍摄权
但是这种被人瞪着感觉很不好
所以我大都只拍风景
对拍人有些不适应.......
但是这种被人瞪着感觉很不好
所以我大都只拍风景
对拍人有些不适应.......
u*u
6 楼
拍小孩子还是问问大人吧,我拍狗还问主人呢,哈哈
现在恋童癖那么多,你家娃别人也不能随便拍吧
我看到你帖子题目就直接点进来了,哈
现在恋童癖那么多,你家娃别人也不能随便拍吧
我看到你帖子题目就直接点进来了,哈
K*t
7 楼
去人多大公园拍就不怕
如果有表演更好
如果有表演更好
d*h
10 楼
D*3
11 楼
说好的拍摄权呢?
拍摄权在愤怒的人面前都是渣
所以我宁愿拍花拍草拍风景 也不愿意拍人
太麻烦了..........
【在 d*h 的大作中提到】
: 一个字,以后先问在拍,看看这些人有多愤怒:
: http://www.freerangekids.com/a-man-photographed-my-kid-at-the-playground-smash-him-in-the-face/
拍摄权在愤怒的人面前都是渣
所以我宁愿拍花拍草拍风景 也不愿意拍人
太麻烦了..........
【在 d*h 的大作中提到】
: 一个字,以后先问在拍,看看这些人有多愤怒:
: http://www.freerangekids.com/a-man-photographed-my-kid-at-the-playground-smash-him-in-the-face/
h*y
13 楼
拍摄权个卵,不征得家长同意拍幼童分分钟叫警察把你带走。
D*3
14 楼
It is legal to photograph or videotape anything and anyone on any public
property.
There is No Right to Privacy in Public
Privacy is defined as “the state or condition of being free from being
observed or disturbed by other people.” Obviously, it would be objectively
unreasonable to expect privacy on a city street or on a crowded subway. So,
when someone claims that anyone may take photographs of whatever they want
when they are in a public place, another way of saying that the privacy
right of a person doesn’t apply unless that person has a reasonable
expectation of privacy. Put more directly, you have given up any
expectation that you cannot be “observed or disturbed by other people” by
virtue of entering a public space or being in a position where you can be
seen by others in a public space. And that is why when in a public space, a
street photographer can take a picture of anything he or she can see from
that vantage point, even including subjects on private property, so long as
they are within public view. For example, a photographer would be free to
photograph a couple sitting on a restaurant patio, or even inside the
restaurant through a window, so long as the photographer is on public
property.
property.
There is No Right to Privacy in Public
Privacy is defined as “the state or condition of being free from being
observed or disturbed by other people.” Obviously, it would be objectively
unreasonable to expect privacy on a city street or on a crowded subway. So,
when someone claims that anyone may take photographs of whatever they want
when they are in a public place, another way of saying that the privacy
right of a person doesn’t apply unless that person has a reasonable
expectation of privacy. Put more directly, you have given up any
expectation that you cannot be “observed or disturbed by other people” by
virtue of entering a public space or being in a position where you can be
seen by others in a public space. And that is why when in a public space, a
street photographer can take a picture of anything he or she can see from
that vantage point, even including subjects on private property, so long as
they are within public view. For example, a photographer would be free to
photograph a couple sitting on a restaurant patio, or even inside the
restaurant through a window, so long as the photographer is on public
property.
d*a
15 楼
是合法的。警察叔叔把你带走了也会放的。只是不想惹麻烦。
要是被摄对象(或者其父母)不乐意的话,我宁愿不要拍
objectively
,
【在 D***3 的大作中提到】
: It is legal to photograph or videotape anything and anyone on any public
: property.
: There is No Right to Privacy in Public
: Privacy is defined as “the state or condition of being free from being
: observed or disturbed by other people.” Obviously, it would be objectively
: unreasonable to expect privacy on a city street or on a crowded subway. So,
: when someone claims that anyone may take photographs of whatever they want
: when they are in a public place, another way of saying that the privacy
: right of a person doesn’t apply unless that person has a reasonable
: expectation of privacy. Put more directly, you have given up any
要是被摄对象(或者其父母)不乐意的话,我宁愿不要拍
objectively
,
【在 D***3 的大作中提到】
: It is legal to photograph or videotape anything and anyone on any public
: property.
: There is No Right to Privacy in Public
: Privacy is defined as “the state or condition of being free from being
: observed or disturbed by other people.” Obviously, it would be objectively
: unreasonable to expect privacy on a city street or on a crowded subway. So,
: when someone claims that anyone may take photographs of whatever they want
: when they are in a public place, another way of saying that the privacy
: right of a person doesn’t apply unless that person has a reasonable
: expectation of privacy. Put more directly, you have given up any
a*e
16 楼
这个不是隐私权的问题吧
肖像权咋说?
objectively
,
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 13
【在 D***3 的大作中提到】
: It is legal to photograph or videotape anything and anyone on any public
: property.
: There is No Right to Privacy in Public
: Privacy is defined as “the state or condition of being free from being
: observed or disturbed by other people.” Obviously, it would be objectively
: unreasonable to expect privacy on a city street or on a crowded subway. So,
: when someone claims that anyone may take photographs of whatever they want
: when they are in a public place, another way of saying that the privacy
: right of a person doesn’t apply unless that person has a reasonable
: expectation of privacy. Put more directly, you have given up any
肖像权咋说?
objectively
,
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 13
【在 D***3 的大作中提到】
: It is legal to photograph or videotape anything and anyone on any public
: property.
: There is No Right to Privacy in Public
: Privacy is defined as “the state or condition of being free from being
: observed or disturbed by other people.” Obviously, it would be objectively
: unreasonable to expect privacy on a city street or on a crowded subway. So,
: when someone claims that anyone may take photographs of whatever they want
: when they are in a public place, another way of saying that the privacy
: right of a person doesn’t apply unless that person has a reasonable
: expectation of privacy. Put more directly, you have given up any
P*i
20 楼
图呢
相关阅读
这个三脚架如何阿?good deal?求dslr的教程露点照,少儿不宜~ (转载)买了个50mm/1.4D, blade上有油,怎么办?转帖-全球单反相机排行榜请求这里的大侠们推荐NEX sample photo w. voigtlander 35/1.4 & 18-55 kit lens不拍video的话,5D值得升级到兔子不?现在回国带自用摄影器材有被征税的风险么?谁要monopod?Manfrotto 680B求助: EPL-1 VS LX5STUSSY X RICOH GRIII DIGITAL 30th ANNIVERSARY CAMERA7D+15-85 $1700 NEW胶卷冲洗问题Amazon上这个算deal 吗?划算吗?Pentax 645D: the first review终于找到我的偶像了----EPA5d2+小白兔 $4199.95d7k+24-70,shopper里面有adorama么?NJ有支856