关于virtual destructor的实现: 也是用vtable实现的吗? base class 和derived class 的virtual destructor 是不会override each other的 吧,所以在delete base class pointer to derived class object时,两个 destructor都会被call, 这样说对不对?
L*n
3 楼
都是自己人, 不用说谢谢浪费版面了, 欢迎针对各种各样的个股发表言之无物的讨论. 这个list是江湖上某个公司的conviction list, 意思就是这个公司坚定不移地推荐大 家买或者卖, 但是这公司的话不可全信, 当年这公司把多少航空公司发配到150刀一桶 油的山上站岗啊. 宝贝, 要有自己的研究, 有自己的主见哦. GNA Buy WY Buy EAT Buy CCL Sell CCO Sell ETH Sell F Buy IGT Buy TEN Buy LOW Buy CVS Buy CCE Buy DPS Buy CLX Buy DVN Buy HAL Buy HES Buy MEE Buy SU Buy TDW Sell WFT Buy BK Buy CBL Buy ESS Sell FII Sell ICE Buy JPM Buy LAZ Buy LNC Buy MET Buy OZM
H*N
4 楼
If you propose to have experiments done in your former supervisor's lab, you need to put him/her on you grant as either a co-i or consultant, and you will need his/her letter. There is no rule against that. That said, it may be better to stay clear from your former boss, since that WILL create an impression of you not being independent. That can become a problem when it comes tenure time too.
f*4
5 楼
virtual destructor就是干这个活的 下次,你可以自己写个代码检验一下 #include class A{ public: virtual ~A() { printf("A::~A\n"); } }; class B: public A { public: virtual ~B() { printf("B::~B\n"); } }; int main() { A *p = new B(); delete p; printf("=====\n"); B b; A &a = b; }
l*g
6 楼
导师写support letter 一点问题都没有
a*r
7 楼
It is possible that a letter from your formal advisor may make you look less dependent than you want to. To address this concern, you might want to upplay the difference and downplay the similarity bw you and your advisor. For example, you can ask your advisor to write in the letter of support and stress that he or she is impressed that the protoge is breaking out a brand new world etc.