黄金是用来规避风险的不是用来投资的 - 未名空间MITBBS历史存档

国际科技财经博客移民网络热点娱乐民生时事公众号

Redian新闻

>未名空间

>Stock

黄金是用来规避风险的不是用来投资的

黄金是用来规避风险的不是用来投资的# Stock

s*12010-02-25 08:02

1 楼

http://www.fool.com/investing/mutual-funds/2007/09/28/gold-vs-the-sp-500.aspx
Gold vs. the S&P 500
By Selena Maranjian
September 28, 2007 | Comments (4)
Recs
9
* Email
* Share
* Print
ShareThis
I recently ran across a chart pointing out that gold -- represented, in this
case, by the streetTRACKS Gold Shares (NYSE: GLD) exchange-traded fund --
has outperformed the S&P 500 over the past two years. It made me worry that
the chart might inspire some people to move some -- or even most --

s*n2010-02-25 08:02

2 楼

Report this Comment On August 03, 2009, at 7:03 PM, casoul87 wrote: This has
no credibility. For the following reasons: 1) The dollar has lost 95% of
its purchasing power since 1913, this article may be referring to a pre-1913
dollar. 2) Since the U.S. has been taken off the gold standard ($35/oz) by
Nixon, gold has risen to $950/oz+. 3) And in terms of even short-term
investments, the best 1-yr return for stocks (DOW) has been 31.1% as
compared to a 198.8% from rare coins, or even 100.2% from g

【在 s*****1 的大作中提到】

: http://www.fool.com/investing/mutual-funds/2007/09/28/gold-vs-the-sp-500.aspx
: Gold vs. the S&P 500
: By Selena Maranjian
: September 28, 2007 | Comments (4)
: Recs
: 9
: * Email
: * Share
: * Print
: ShareThis

v*m2010-02-25 08:02

3 楼

恭喜发财，给下面RE的发包子吧。

has
1913
by

【在 s********n 的大作中提到】

: Report this Comment On August 03, 2009, at 7:03 PM, casoul87 wrote: This has
: no credibility. For the following reasons: 1) The dollar has lost 95% of
: its purchasing power since 1913, this article may be referring to a pre-1913
: dollar. 2) Since the U.S. has been taken off the gold standard ($35/oz) by
: Nixon, gold has risen to $950/oz+. 3) And in terms of even short-term
: investments, the best 1-yr return for stocks (DOW) has been 31.1% as
: compared to a 198.8% from rare coins, or even 100.2% from g