ORCL 今天也奇怪的涨了不少# Stock
w*w
1 楼
感恩節求祝福過 （http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t0/Immigration/32663669.html）。聖誕節前收到RFE。claim了老三樣。RFE承認了authorship和judgement，否決了contribution。本人從事biomedical領域。
在信中，IO XM100首先簡單羅列了我提交的證據：You have submitted several
letters of support；Your work has been independently citied 87 times； Your
work has been published in notable journals； One of your articles was an
editor's choice.；You have made first time discoveries. 接著他承認了“you
have made first time discoveries and your work has been recognized;
therefore, you have conducted original research. USCIS also recognizes your
research abilities。” 然後，他認為“the totality of your work has not risen
to a major significance within your field. ”以下是他的理由：
1. Given your publication rate, and citation record it has not been
established your work has made a major significant impact within your field.
2. It is notable you have published your work in notable journals;
however, this alone does not establish your work has made a major
significant impact.
3. USCIS understands your citation record is higher than the average
citation rate, but it must be noted you are comparing your citation to the
average in the field, which does establish your work has made a major
significant impact.
4. USCIS recognizes your work has been helpful and has contributed to
future research; however the record falls short in establishing your work
has made a major significant impact within the field.
最後XM100提出需要
1. Objective documentary evidence of the significance of your contribution
to the field；
2. Evidence of your work being implemented by others， such as contracts，
licensed technology， patients.
實際上，在original petition中，我提交了新聞媒體對我的研究的報導，並且得到很
多著名媒體的轉載；提交了2個生物公司應用我的研究的證據（實際這些研究就是和這2
家公司合作的）；提交了evidences showing my citation ranks top 5% in my field
（Web of Science的排列組合大法）；提交了一些深入討論我的研究的文章。這些
XM100都沒有提及。是不是可以重新打印組織一下提交。
請大家給些建議。多謝！
在信中，IO XM100首先簡單羅列了我提交的證據：You have submitted several
letters of support；Your work has been independently citied 87 times； Your
work has been published in notable journals； One of your articles was an
editor's choice.；You have made first time discoveries. 接著他承認了“you
have made first time discoveries and your work has been recognized;
therefore, you have conducted original research. USCIS also recognizes your
research abilities。” 然後，他認為“the totality of your work has not risen
to a major significance within your field. ”以下是他的理由：
1. Given your publication rate, and citation record it has not been
established your work has made a major significant impact within your field.
2. It is notable you have published your work in notable journals;
however, this alone does not establish your work has made a major
significant impact.
3. USCIS understands your citation record is higher than the average
citation rate, but it must be noted you are comparing your citation to the
average in the field, which does establish your work has made a major
significant impact.
4. USCIS recognizes your work has been helpful and has contributed to
future research; however the record falls short in establishing your work
has made a major significant impact within the field.
最後XM100提出需要
1. Objective documentary evidence of the significance of your contribution
to the field；
2. Evidence of your work being implemented by others， such as contracts，
licensed technology， patients.
實際上，在original petition中，我提交了新聞媒體對我的研究的報導，並且得到很
多著名媒體的轉載；提交了2個生物公司應用我的研究的證據（實際這些研究就是和這2
家公司合作的）；提交了evidences showing my citation ranks top 5% in my field
（Web of Science的排列組合大法）；提交了一些深入討論我的研究的文章。這些
XM100都沒有提及。是不是可以重新打印組織一下提交。
請大家給些建議。多謝！
