Redian新闻
>
ATPG和CMZ要不要割肉?
avatar
ATPG和CMZ要不要割肉?# Stock
Q*n
1
03/02/2012 Receipt date of I-485 based on NIW at TSC.
12/03/2012 EB-1A I-140 approved by NSC.因为知道USCIS并不会自动链接,开始着手
interfiling.
12/06/2012 E-mailed E**********[email protected] with Subject: I-485 Multiple
I-140s.很快收到confirmation E-mail,但是这只是确认收到你的E-mail,并没有确定
interfiling.
12/10/2012 因为不放心,Called 800-375-5283 for SR,工作人员觉得I-485处理已经超
出期限,所以可以SR,我也懒得仔细解释EB2 priority date.
2012/12/14 Received E-mail response of SR: "As a result of your recently
approved I-140 that upgraded your preference to employment-based 1st
preference, your priority date is current and a visa is available. As such,
your file has been requested. Upon receipt, your case will be reviewed. You
should receive correspondence within the next 60 days regarding this case.
If you do not receive this correspondence, please contact customer service
at the number provided below." 我以为万事大吉,只要等待60天即可.
01/07/2013 Renewed EAD/AP,以防EAD过期前拿不到绿卡,因为LD用EAD工作. 经Raki提
醒,邮寄了一封request interfiling的信.因为有人因为没有written request后来收到
RFE.
02/12/2013 60天等待期满,只好又打电话,要求second level immigration officer.
她说看起来万事俱备,任何时间可以批准,建议再等两个星期.
02/27/2013 14天等待期满,只好又打电话,要求second level immigration officer(已
不是上一次的那个人), 她建议E-mail t**************[email protected] with USCIS
referral ID 或者继续等待.于是按建议发E-mail.
03/15/2013 再次打电话,要求second level immigration officer.这次immigration
officer态度非常恶劣,说要么SR,要么等待,除此之外他无可奉告.我说那我不要SR,因为
那样只会额外增加等待的时间.
03/21/2013 INFOPASS at local office. 告诉我仍在审理中,也许是背景调查,也许是
不知道的原因,最多可以等待2-3年.
03/21/2013 E-mailed S********[email protected] with name, date and time of SR,
receipt no. A#, receipt date, briefly explain the issue.
03/22/2013 联系本州参议员.
03/25/2013 无意中被03/15/2013的immigration officer做了SR,收到 e-mail
response to March 18 SR: "We have received your service request and
researched the status of your case. We have had to perform additional review
and this has caused a delay in processing time. Your case is currently
under review. You should receive a decision or notice of further action
within 90 days."
04/01/2013 收到 e-mail from t**************[email protected] :"Your file is
currently in route to a supervisory officer for review and assignment.
Please allow 45 days for notice of action in your case."
04/02/2013 收到参议员办公室工作人员E-mail:"I have contacted our liaison at
the Texas Service Center regarding both your and your wife's applications.
Our liaison indicated that both your FBI name checks and fingerprints are
current.You should have a decision or notice of action in 30-45 days.If you
have not heard anything in 45 days, please call our office so that I may
again follow up."
04/13/2013 发现USCIS case status变成了card/document production.
总的个人体会是USCIS需要外部压力才能有所作为, 因此效用依次是 Senator >> SR >
INFOPASS = E-mail or letter.
我的E-mails和letter基本没有response,除了04/01/2013的response(已超出合理回复
时间),很明显是由于联系senator后给TSC带来的压力.
INFOPASS工作人员要么是经验有限,要么是按照规定不可以透漏详细信息,总之作用非常
有限,但是你可以用已经做了INFOPASS无果,来justify联系参议员.
SR因为要求15天内必须有response,肯定能提供一些信息,但是你所收到的response很可
能是template语言,不要期望过高.我一直不能肯定的是当我们联系了second level
immigration officer之后,他/她会做些什么? 猜测大概是发一个E-mail or note给经
办的immigration officer,后者完全可能置之不理.因为每次联系的second level
immigration officer都不同,很难让他们对你的case负责到底.
联系参议员的效果对我来说是立竿见影.
最后,祝所有需要interfiling的人心想事成,不再需要漫长的等待.
附EB1-A I-140申请情况:
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t0/Immigration/32676563.html
avatar
l*u
2
昨天没舍得割,今天又怕割到地板上,其实O8的新政策对ATPG影响不大,不知道为啥跌
这么惨
avatar
v*t
3
赞,前排占座

Multiple

【在 Q*n 的大作中提到】
: 03/02/2012 Receipt date of I-485 based on NIW at TSC.
: 12/03/2012 EB-1A I-140 approved by NSC.因为知道USCIS并不会自动链接,开始着手
: interfiling.
: 12/06/2012 E-mailed E**********[email protected] with Subject: I-485 Multiple
: I-140s.很快收到confirmation E-mail,但是这只是确认收到你的E-mail,并没有确定
: interfiling.
: 12/10/2012 因为不放心,Called 800-375-5283 for SR,工作人员觉得I-485处理已经超
: 出期限,所以可以SR,我也懒得仔细解释EB2 priority date.
: 2012/12/14 Received E-mail response of SR: "As a result of your recently
: approved I-140 that upgraded your preference to employment-based 1st

avatar
s*7
4
co ask, 08的政策对油股有多大影响。

【在 l***u 的大作中提到】
: 昨天没舍得割,今天又怕割到地板上,其实O8的新政策对ATPG影响不大,不知道为啥跌
: 这么惨

avatar
p*e
5
cong!
多谢分享


Multiple

【在 Q*n 的大作中提到】
: 03/02/2012 Receipt date of I-485 based on NIW at TSC.
: 12/03/2012 EB-1A I-140 approved by NSC.因为知道USCIS并不会自动链接,开始着手
: interfiling.
: 12/06/2012 E-mailed E**********[email protected] with Subject: I-485 Multiple
: I-140s.很快收到confirmation E-mail,但是这只是确认收到你的E-mail,并没有确定
: interfiling.
: 12/10/2012 因为不放心,Called 800-375-5283 for SR,工作人员觉得I-485处理已经超
: 出期限,所以可以SR,我也懒得仔细解释EB2 priority date.
: 2012/12/14 Received E-mail response of SR: "As a result of your recently
: approved I-140 that upgraded your preference to employment-based 1st

avatar
g*d
6
All of ATPG's assets are in Gulf of Mexican. When O8 restricts drilling
there. ATPG's assets will be worth a lot less or even worthless.
Option trades indicate ATPG may drop to $8.00 by June and 50% in 8 months
avatar
H*N
7
我的老天!这也太复杂了。我是3月6号RELINK上的。当时受到的回复是需要等90天。到
现在才40天,难道非要再等很长时间?真煎熬啊。
avatar
d*7
8
好像它有油井被封了。

【在 l***u 的大作中提到】
: 昨天没舍得割,今天又怕割到地板上,其实O8的新政策对ATPG影响不大,不知道为啥跌
: 这么惨

avatar
w*e
9
总结的好!
”USCIS需要外部压力才能有所作为, 因此效用依次是 Senator >> SR >
INFOPASS = E-mail or letter.“
avatar
x*1
10
ke xi , ke xi. u should cut the 1st day once you have some bad smell.
avatar
H*N
11
实在是太折腾了,时间和精力上有些让人吃不消啊。
avatar
H*N
12
这些周折仅仅是因为RELINK吗?还是正常的485也会遇到?lz说说看?
avatar
C*d
13
gxgx

Multiple

【在 Q*n 的大作中提到】
: 03/02/2012 Receipt date of I-485 based on NIW at TSC.
: 12/03/2012 EB-1A I-140 approved by NSC.因为知道USCIS并不会自动链接,开始着手
: interfiling.
: 12/06/2012 E-mailed E**********[email protected] with Subject: I-485 Multiple
: I-140s.很快收到confirmation E-mail,但是这只是确认收到你的E-mail,并没有确定
: interfiling.
: 12/10/2012 因为不放心,Called 800-375-5283 for SR,工作人员觉得I-485处理已经超
: 出期限,所以可以SR,我也懒得仔细解释EB2 priority date.
: 2012/12/14 Received E-mail response of SR: "As a result of your recently
: approved I-140 that upgraded your preference to employment-based 1st

avatar
Q*n
14
我的实际等待时间从relink到批准,大约是120天,还是在我不断的督促下.但是大部分
relink好象不需要这么长时间.记得版上前一段怨男也就是大概三个月左右.
90天只是模版,没有人会承担责任,只是说你可以再次查询.

【在 H*******N 的大作中提到】
: 我的老天!这也太复杂了。我是3月6号RELINK上的。当时受到的回复是需要等90天。到
: 现在才40天,难道非要再等很长时间?真煎熬啊。

avatar
Q*n
15
Relink由于不属于常规业务,很难跟踪进展,与正常的485处理似乎不在一个序列.理论上
relink应该更快,但是因为需要有人很负责地做这件事情,但也有可能被束之高阁.

【在 H*******N 的大作中提到】
: 这些周折仅仅是因为RELINK吗?还是正常的485也会遇到?lz说说看?
avatar
H*N
16
如此看来,这relink除了可能省点钱以外,时间上并不省多少。而且由于增加了不确定
性,搞得人更无所适从。

【在 Q*n 的大作中提到】
: Relink由于不属于常规业务,很难跟踪进展,与正常的485处理似乎不在一个序列.理论上
: relink应该更快,但是因为需要有人很负责地做这件事情,但也有可能被束之高阁.

相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。