j*a
2 楼
哎，没人理，只好自己google了
It is obviously not technically possible for any shareholder or category of
shareholder to hold more than 100% of a company's outstanding shares.
Therefore, when you see investment information websites reporting
institutional holdings exceeding the 100% mark, something is wrong with the
data. There are two likely sources that are responsible for the reporting
errors.
First, the figures in an institution's report correspond to an "
institutional holdings date". These can differ somewhat among the various
institutions holding a company's stock, resulting in differences that could
impact the reported percentage for institutional holdings. The data
presented is updated monthly with an approximate lag of four weeks. As a
result, even a slight imprecision in the reporting dates among one or more
institutions could throw off the count.
Second, we checked with Ownership Analyzer, which provides data on
institutional investors' holdings. Here's our summary of their take on the
most likely cause of distorted institutional holdings percentages:
Let's say that XYZ Company has 20 million shares outstanding and Institution
A owns all 20 million. In a shorting transaction, Institution B borrows 5
million of these shares from Institution A and sells them to Institution C.
If both A and C claim ownership of the shares shorted by B, the
institutional ownership of XYZ could be reported as 25 million shares (20 +
5), or 125% (25/20).
In cases where reported institutional ownership exceeds 100%, actual
institutional ownership would have to be very high. While somewhat imprecise
, this conclusion helps investors determine the degree of the impact that
institutional purchases and sales could have on a company's stock.
Read more: http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/07/institutional_holdings.asp#ixzz1jCZmAzcR
It is obviously not technically possible for any shareholder or category of
shareholder to hold more than 100% of a company's outstanding shares.
Therefore, when you see investment information websites reporting
institutional holdings exceeding the 100% mark, something is wrong with the
data. There are two likely sources that are responsible for the reporting
errors.
First, the figures in an institution's report correspond to an "
institutional holdings date". These can differ somewhat among the various
institutions holding a company's stock, resulting in differences that could
impact the reported percentage for institutional holdings. The data
presented is updated monthly with an approximate lag of four weeks. As a
result, even a slight imprecision in the reporting dates among one or more
institutions could throw off the count.
Second, we checked with Ownership Analyzer, which provides data on
institutional investors' holdings. Here's our summary of their take on the
most likely cause of distorted institutional holdings percentages:
Let's say that XYZ Company has 20 million shares outstanding and Institution
A owns all 20 million. In a shorting transaction, Institution B borrows 5
million of these shares from Institution A and sells them to Institution C.
If both A and C claim ownership of the shares shorted by B, the
institutional ownership of XYZ could be reported as 25 million shares (20 +
5), or 125% (25/20).
In cases where reported institutional ownership exceeds 100%, actual
institutional ownership would have to be very high. While somewhat imprecise
, this conclusion helps investors determine the degree of the impact that
institutional purchases and sales could have on a company's stock.
Read more: http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/07/institutional_holdings.asp#ixzz1jCZmAzcR
B*o
3 楼
Is that the only reason?
相关阅读
can I short TSLA !!!!你们的broker能看所有的卖卖单吗？除了最接近的TSLA要新高？[通知] Stock 举办博彩：周二，7/2，S&P涨跌钻翻了今天是牛套美国的房价/金价在过去100年里没有上涨过 (转载)tsla NEW HIGH! OH YEAH BABE两房明天还要涨。buy dip is right again ????虎神发包子同学们嗨过了喊一声. Time to short AMZN now.call on FSLR傅苹造假事件:承认有误 愿写信向苏州大学道歉(zz)接下来怎么操作呢？根本跌不动FB这个星期如果不快速突破25.5的话tsla 终于爆发了DDD 终于出水了