机构得到了比期望的多(转载)# Stock
l*m
1 楼
【 以下文字转载自 SanFrancisco 讨论区 】
发信人: iapp (iapp), 信区: SanFrancisco
标 题: wtf
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat May 19 01:24:44 2012, 美东)
机构得到了比期望的多。retail investors（“muppets”）得到了前所未有的派发（
占多于20％的量）。CFO还打算明年再卖点。
http://www.cnbc.com/id/47477513/
However, with anecdotal reports that some institutional investors got more
shares than they were expecting, and new revelations that, according to two
people close to the matter, the retail allocation of Facebook IPO shares was
more than 20 percent, marking an all-time high for a new issue, some market
participants are wondering whether the investor excitement toward the deal
was overplayed earlier this week.
(Small investors are the IPO recipients “of last resort,” said one banker
who was not directly involved with the deal but has experience with new
issues, because they don’t carry a great deal of pricing power and may not
hold the stock long term.)
But other people familiar with the matter say that the rebuffs were few to
none, and that it was Facebook CFO David Ebersman’s call to price at a more
-conservative $38 per share. The CFO felt strongly about not pricing the IPO
too aggressively, say these people, wanting to feel good about the decision
over the long term and knowing that more stock would likely need to be sold
within the next year.
发信人: iapp (iapp), 信区: SanFrancisco
标 题: wtf
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat May 19 01:24:44 2012, 美东)
机构得到了比期望的多。retail investors（“muppets”）得到了前所未有的派发（
占多于20％的量）。CFO还打算明年再卖点。
http://www.cnbc.com/id/47477513/
However, with anecdotal reports that some institutional investors got more
shares than they were expecting, and new revelations that, according to two
people close to the matter, the retail allocation of Facebook IPO shares was
more than 20 percent, marking an all-time high for a new issue, some market
participants are wondering whether the investor excitement toward the deal
was overplayed earlier this week.
(Small investors are the IPO recipients “of last resort,” said one banker
who was not directly involved with the deal but has experience with new
issues, because they don’t carry a great deal of pricing power and may not
hold the stock long term.)
But other people familiar with the matter say that the rebuffs were few to
none, and that it was Facebook CFO David Ebersman’s call to price at a more
-conservative $38 per share. The CFO felt strongly about not pricing the IPO
too aggressively, say these people, wanting to feel good about the decision
over the long term and knowing that more stock would likely need to be sold
within the next year.