AFFY dived -85% - 未名空间MITBBS历史存档

国际科技财经博客移民网络热点娱乐民生时事公众号

Redian新闻

>未名空间

>Stock

AFFY dived -85%

AFFY dived -85%# Stock

u*v2013-02-25 08:02

1 楼

发信人: wfath (Fath), 版面: Stock
标题: AFFY dived -85%
发信站: 阿凡提BBS (2013/02/25 11:53:41 EST)
Do you want to invest in biotech company without diversification? This is
the bloody experience. Risk does exist. As an investor, we can not only
focus on the return, but also control our risk exposure.

a*h2013-02-25 08:02

2 楼

很壮观啊

【在 u**v 的大作中提到】

: 发信人: wfath (Fath), 版面: Stock
: 标题: AFFY dived -85%
: 发信站: 阿凡提BBS (2013/02/25 11:53:41 EST)
: Do you want to invest in biotech company without diversification? This is
: the bloody experience. Risk does exist. As an investor, we can not only
: focus on the return, but also control our risk exposure.

r*l2013-02-25 08:02

3 楼

For most of people, in term of small biotech stocks, it is nothing to do
with diversification. Very simple, just forget small biotech stocks.

u*v2013-02-25 08:02

4 楼

When we see a jump of 85% on the upside, the argument might be totally
different. Forget? NO

【在 r***l 的大作中提到】

: For most of people, in term of small biotech stocks, it is nothing to do
: with diversification. Very simple, just forget small biotech stocks.

r*l2013-02-25 08:02

5 楼

at least i always hold the same opinion.
People in here started to love small biotech stocks about a year ago when
Zhuxi's ARNA had a 10 day sunny bars in a row. Even at time, I reiterated "
don't touch small biotech stocks". Very simple, always forget small biotech
stocks even today you see a biotech stock jumps 1000%.

【在 u**v 的大作中提到】

: When we see a jump of 85% on the upside, the argument might be totally
: different. Forget? NO

b*i2013-02-25 08:02

6 楼

08年的时候你也可以对巴菲特说，‘股市十年从7000点涨到14000点现在又跌回7000点
，早叫你别炒股了’

biotech

【在 r***l 的大作中提到】

: at least i always hold the same opinion.
: People in here started to love small biotech stocks about a year ago when
: Zhuxi's ARNA had a 10 day sunny bars in a row. Even at time, I reiterated "
: don't touch small biotech stocks". Very simple, always forget small biotech
: stocks even today you see a biotech stock jumps 1000%.

l*i2013-02-25 08:02

7 楼

可以投到相关基金上，比如HQH，当然也要看政策方面的变化，也受大势影响，但比做
单一的小生物股要安全得多

biotech

【在 r***l 的大作中提到】

u*n2013-02-25 08:02

8 楼

Risk/reward is not good. When it jumps 85%, you barely get double; when you
lose 85%, you have only 1/7 left. It would be fair if you get 7 fold or lose
6/7.

【在 u**v 的大作中提到】

: When we see a jump of 85% on the upside, the argument might be totally
: different. Forget? NO

r*l2013-02-25 08:02

9 楼

Actually, I pretty agree that we shouldn't trade at all because in the long
run, most of us including me either lose/wipe out or get even. So it is
indeed a waste of time. But on the other side, trading is a pretty
fascinating game. I want to enjoy this game and hope i can make some money.
I don't know if I can finally make money or not, but I do know that I and
most of people will lose money (if not wiped out) if trading biotech stocks.
Regarding Buffet, first he is not 炒股, he is investor. You also forget the
dividend. Buffet made at least 20% return in 10 years even sp500 went back
to where it started in 10 years. If a guy had held SPY from 1998 to 2008 and
only made dividend, he is not 炒股. He should be proud of himself and tell
those wiped out suckers "早叫你别炒股了"

【在 b******i 的大作中提到】

: 08年的时候你也可以对巴菲特说，‘股市十年从7000点涨到14000点现在又跌回7000点
: ，早叫你别炒股了’
:
: biotech

m*i2013-02-25 08:02

10 楼

this is very unusual. Their product was approved, unfortunately, the drug
caused 5 death.
There is very slim chance they could find out why it caused the such strong
side effect after initial dose.

【在 u**v 的大作中提到】

B*r2013-02-25 08:02

11 楼

巴菲特是价值投资，跟生物小药股的投机有本质的区别。

【在 b******i 的大作中提到】

: 08年的时候你也可以对巴菲特说，‘股市十年从7000点涨到14000点现在又跌回7000点
: ，早叫你别炒股了’
:
: biotech

s*s2013-02-25 08:02

12 楼

跟DNDN有一拼,不过DNDN我进出快挣了点, 这个没敢动.

a*12013-02-25 08:02

13 楼

CMC problem, I can bet my money on it.

strong

【在 m*****i 的大作中提到】

: this is very unusual. Their product was approved, unfortunately, the drug
: caused 5 death.
: There is very slim chance they could find out why it caused the such strong
: side effect after initial dose.