Redian新闻
>
其实主要还是nasdaq暴跌导致的
avatar
其实主要还是nasdaq暴跌导致的# Stock
f*d
1
科技股都在跌
avatar
R*g
2
Looked with ScottradeELITE time line, it is exactly at 14:50: almost every
major stock:
aapl, fb, googl, nvda, qcom, amat, asml, lrcx, isrg, avgo, klac, intc etc
had lowest point of the day.
It was the computer targeted trading to certain stocks!!!
MRK, TRV do not show the dip like above.
Update:
The online giant's stock tanked and then quickly came back all within the
minute of 2:50 p.m, according to Bloomberg data. Here's a second-by-second
rundown:
2:50:01 p.m.: $960.55 per share
2:50:02 p.m.: $930.00 per share
2:50:03 p.m.: $953.07 per share
2:50:03.5 p.m.: $927.00 per share
2:50:04 p.m.: $959.27 per share
Most speculation by commentators is that the flash crash was either a so-
called "fat finger" trade or an automated trade, but either way it's pretty
wild.
Yes, in the grand scheme of things, it's not a huge move for a stock that
recently cracked $1,000 per share, but oscillating by almost $35 per share
in the space of 3 seconds is quite a move no matter what the stock is.
avatar
f*1
3
今天花街的宠儿几大科技神股AAPL, AMZN, FB, GOOG, NFLX齐刷刷地大跌,有点意思。
avatar
s*e
4
大神,RGLS 是不是已经割了?

【在 f*******1 的大作中提到】
: 今天花街的宠儿几大科技神股AAPL, AMZN, FB, GOOG, NFLX齐刷刷地大跌,有点意思。
avatar
f*g
5
花街今天猛砸科技股是为啥?而且是无差别的,科技股全砸
也没见任何消息啊,除了NVDA的
avatar
t*s
6

因为金融界红眼病造成的,正好借 昨夜dodd-frank vote+英国选举等借口来搞事的。
没用的,金融股 没有发展想像空间,下周QQQ马来上反弹!

【在 f*****d 的大作中提到】
: 科技股都在跌
avatar
R*g
7
Update to my earlier post, saw Bob Bryan wrote at 2pm today (after my post
here)
The online giant's stock tanked and then quickly came back all within the
minute of 2:50 p.m, according to Bloomberg data. Here's a second-by-second
rundown:
2:50:01 p.m.: $960.55 per share
2:50:02 p.m.: $930.00 per share
2:50:03 p.m.: $953.07 per share
2:50:03.5 p.m.: $927.00 per share
2:50:04 p.m.: $959.27 per share
Most speculation by commentators is that the flash crash was either a so-
called "fat finger" trade or an automated trade, but either way it's pretty
wild.
Yes, in the grand scheme of things, it's not a huge move for a stock that
recently cracked $1,000 per share, but oscillating by almost $35 per share
in the space of 3 seconds is quite a move no matter what the stock is.
avatar
Q*g
8
I saw these kind of bottom fishing trick many times. All the stop lose
orders were triggered... poor guy
相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。