w*h
2 楼
http://www.ilw.com/immigrationdaily/digest/2012,0626.shtm
Comment: Grassley Makes Deal With Schumer - In news potentially bigger in
impact than Mr. Obama's momentous announcement of Deferred Action for
DREAMers, Sen. Grassley, Republican of Iowa (Ranking Member of the Judiciary
committee), has after many years of holding up employment immigration
matters in the Senate, finally made a deal with Sen. Schumer, Democrat of
New York (Chairman of the Immigration Sub-committee). The compromise
mandates periodic DOL audits for H1B-dependent employers with over 100
employees, and gives DOL sweeping new powers over all employers in H1B
matters. In return, the per-country limits are swept-aside, with immediate
positive benefits to Indian and Chinese nationals waiting for employment
immigration quotas for many years. For the original amendment by Mr.
Grassley, which had many provisions affecting L visas, which have been
dropped from the compromise, see here. For the compromise language on H
visas see here (this document, for AILA members only, is an amendment to the
amendment, so it has the proposed sweeping DOL powers, but not the per-
country cap elimination language).
The political significance of this compromise is considerable: Mr. Grassley
and Mr. Schumer have often led their parties on immigration matters in the
Senate, especially in this, the 112th Congress. Unsurprisingly, they have
always disagreed, part and parcel of the grid-lock that has stymied action
on immigration for several Congresses now. And that is why this compromise
is significant. We believe this compromise presages many more to come, in
this Congress and the next, especially on employment-immigration matters.
Bits and pieces of CIR will likely come into effect, partly through the
executive branch and partly through the legislative branch. Given the
compromise between these antagonists, it would be a fair guess that votes
exist on the Senate floor for passage, perhaps even expeditiously by
unanimous consent. However, even should the Senate adopt H.R. 3012, the
underlying bill, together with the compromise amendment by voice vote, it
will have to return to the House, where the votes for passage are likely
good.
The moving force behind the underlying bill, is a group of those affected by
the enormous backlogs - a group of primarily Indian beneficiaries,
Immigration Voice (this was the group that was the prime mover behind
Visagate of several summers ago, when all Employment-based categories were
temporarily made "current"). In their email broadcast to the world this
morning advocating for H.R. 3012, as amended by the compromise, Immigration
Voice attacks the immigration bar:
Unfortunately, some immigration lawyers and their advocacy groups in DC
are against this amendment. We believe that this fringe group has always
advocated a system where immigrants are taken advantage of. Immigration
Lawyers have chosen to be on the wrong side of history. They want to protect
companies that are abusing the system. This set of Immigration lawyers want
to side with companies that are under-cutting US workers and committing
fraud. It's time for us to standup to speak for ourselves and tell everyone
that immigration lawyers don't represent immigrants. When it comes to
advocacy, immigration lawyers and their groups only represent their own
special interest to design the system to keep more people in limbo for
longer so that they can pocket more money through renewals and extension of
applications for visas and work-permits while immigrants wait forever in
their green card process. A large percentage of these immigration lawyers
have a vested interest in keeping the immigration process slow and confusing
. They will oppose streamlining or simplifying the process that would help
employers and employees. Housing market is not about realtors; housing
market is about living the American Dream and home ownership. Likewise, the
purpose of immigration system is not to help immigration lawyers line their
pockets with more cash. Immigration system is about America, US Employers
and immigrants. It's time for us to raise our voice and say it loud, that
immigration lawyers or their group doesn't represent Immigrants.
We don't know what the Immigration Voice folks have been smoking, but
whatever it is, it must be rather strong. H. R. 3012, as amended, would lead
to increased business for the immigration bar, since the companies that DOL
would target would need the assistance of the bar in complying with DOL's
new requirements under DOL's new sweeping powers, so the bar cannot
reasonably be viewed as having a self-serving reason were it to oppose this
bill. However, to the extent that AILA has gradually morphed from being a
member association into a publishing powerhouse (2/3rd of AILA's revenues
come from publishing activities, not member dues), AILA has naturally
distanced itself from immigrants, evidenced by the sentiment in the
statement from Immigration Voice above.
To the best of our understanding, the immigration bar is divided in its view
on H.R. 3012 together with the Grassley compromise. There is a faction
supporting the bill since the bill would eliminate per-country quotas, the
last remaining vestige of the racism of the National Origin quotas. There is
another faction opposing the bill since granting DOL sweeping powers in
immigration has never proven good, historically. In contrast to this
disagreement, Immigration Daily emphasizes the political significance of the
Grassley-Schumer compromise, in the belief that many immigration benefits
locked up for years in grid-lock will now begin to flow. Stay tuned to
Immigration Daily for the latest on Capitol Hill immigration action.
Comment: Grassley Makes Deal With Schumer - In news potentially bigger in
impact than Mr. Obama's momentous announcement of Deferred Action for
DREAMers, Sen. Grassley, Republican of Iowa (Ranking Member of the Judiciary
committee), has after many years of holding up employment immigration
matters in the Senate, finally made a deal with Sen. Schumer, Democrat of
New York (Chairman of the Immigration Sub-committee). The compromise
mandates periodic DOL audits for H1B-dependent employers with over 100
employees, and gives DOL sweeping new powers over all employers in H1B
matters. In return, the per-country limits are swept-aside, with immediate
positive benefits to Indian and Chinese nationals waiting for employment
immigration quotas for many years. For the original amendment by Mr.
Grassley, which had many provisions affecting L visas, which have been
dropped from the compromise, see here. For the compromise language on H
visas see here (this document, for AILA members only, is an amendment to the
amendment, so it has the proposed sweeping DOL powers, but not the per-
country cap elimination language).
The political significance of this compromise is considerable: Mr. Grassley
and Mr. Schumer have often led their parties on immigration matters in the
Senate, especially in this, the 112th Congress. Unsurprisingly, they have
always disagreed, part and parcel of the grid-lock that has stymied action
on immigration for several Congresses now. And that is why this compromise
is significant. We believe this compromise presages many more to come, in
this Congress and the next, especially on employment-immigration matters.
Bits and pieces of CIR will likely come into effect, partly through the
executive branch and partly through the legislative branch. Given the
compromise between these antagonists, it would be a fair guess that votes
exist on the Senate floor for passage, perhaps even expeditiously by
unanimous consent. However, even should the Senate adopt H.R. 3012, the
underlying bill, together with the compromise amendment by voice vote, it
will have to return to the House, where the votes for passage are likely
good.
The moving force behind the underlying bill, is a group of those affected by
the enormous backlogs - a group of primarily Indian beneficiaries,
Immigration Voice (this was the group that was the prime mover behind
Visagate of several summers ago, when all Employment-based categories were
temporarily made "current"). In their email broadcast to the world this
morning advocating for H.R. 3012, as amended by the compromise, Immigration
Voice attacks the immigration bar:
Unfortunately, some immigration lawyers and their advocacy groups in DC
are against this amendment. We believe that this fringe group has always
advocated a system where immigrants are taken advantage of. Immigration
Lawyers have chosen to be on the wrong side of history. They want to protect
companies that are abusing the system. This set of Immigration lawyers want
to side with companies that are under-cutting US workers and committing
fraud. It's time for us to standup to speak for ourselves and tell everyone
that immigration lawyers don't represent immigrants. When it comes to
advocacy, immigration lawyers and their groups only represent their own
special interest to design the system to keep more people in limbo for
longer so that they can pocket more money through renewals and extension of
applications for visas and work-permits while immigrants wait forever in
their green card process. A large percentage of these immigration lawyers
have a vested interest in keeping the immigration process slow and confusing
. They will oppose streamlining or simplifying the process that would help
employers and employees. Housing market is not about realtors; housing
market is about living the American Dream and home ownership. Likewise, the
purpose of immigration system is not to help immigration lawyers line their
pockets with more cash. Immigration system is about America, US Employers
and immigrants. It's time for us to raise our voice and say it loud, that
immigration lawyers or their group doesn't represent Immigrants.
We don't know what the Immigration Voice folks have been smoking, but
whatever it is, it must be rather strong. H. R. 3012, as amended, would lead
to increased business for the immigration bar, since the companies that DOL
would target would need the assistance of the bar in complying with DOL's
new requirements under DOL's new sweeping powers, so the bar cannot
reasonably be viewed as having a self-serving reason were it to oppose this
bill. However, to the extent that AILA has gradually morphed from being a
member association into a publishing powerhouse (2/3rd of AILA's revenues
come from publishing activities, not member dues), AILA has naturally
distanced itself from immigrants, evidenced by the sentiment in the
statement from Immigration Voice above.
To the best of our understanding, the immigration bar is divided in its view
on H.R. 3012 together with the Grassley compromise. There is a faction
supporting the bill since the bill would eliminate per-country quotas, the
last remaining vestige of the racism of the National Origin quotas. There is
another faction opposing the bill since granting DOL sweeping powers in
immigration has never proven good, historically. In contrast to this
disagreement, Immigration Daily emphasizes the political significance of the
Grassley-Schumer compromise, in the belief that many immigration benefits
locked up for years in grid-lock will now begin to flow. Stay tuned to
Immigration Daily for the latest on Capitol Hill immigration action.
F*o
3 楼
是封起来,还是在closet里面发个terro直接引出来杀呢?
谢谢
谢谢
f*t
4 楼
最不满的是演员太老,虽然井柏然和Baby比杨洋和郑爽没大几岁,但扮相差了很多。这
两看着不像本科生,倒像是辅导员,或是成人教育生,看着不容易入戏。井柏然也没有
大帅哥风采,总觉得他像谁,后来想明白他跟朱婷很像,。
再一个不满的是太现实,游戏里的人物和场景,没有游戏风格,化妆、衣着、言行举止
,不像虚幻世界,而像另一个现实世界。而现实的场景和人物,又有点太真实了,宿舍
、办公室凌乱,暴雨太过滂沱等等,干扰YY剧的憧憬和想象。
电影的编剧水平不行。没读过小说,感觉电视剧很忠实于小说,容易知道原作者要表达
的,以及粉丝喜欢的东西。而电影像是小说的系列插图,或者像电视剧的剪辑,太平淡
无趣了,没有创造性。总结一下,就是电影不如电视剧。
两看着不像本科生,倒像是辅导员,或是成人教育生,看着不容易入戏。井柏然也没有
大帅哥风采,总觉得他像谁,后来想明白他跟朱婷很像,。
再一个不满的是太现实,游戏里的人物和场景,没有游戏风格,化妆、衣着、言行举止
,不像虚幻世界,而像另一个现实世界。而现实的场景和人物,又有点太真实了,宿舍
、办公室凌乱,暴雨太过滂沱等等,干扰YY剧的憧憬和想象。
电影的编剧水平不行。没读过小说,感觉电视剧很忠实于小说,容易知道原作者要表达
的,以及粉丝喜欢的东西。而电影像是小说的系列插图,或者像电视剧的剪辑,太平淡
无趣了,没有创造性。总结一下,就是电影不如电视剧。
n*e
5 楼
IV为什么要攻击律师界?IV做事一般很有策略,为什么这次火气那么大,谁来讲讲。
r*y
7 楼
在哪儿看影版呀?
为什么这些偶像剧的影版都不如剧版?照理说电影的制作和主创团队都应该更有优势。
在想是不是有先入为主的原因,加上电视剧时间长,观众更容易培养出对角色的感情?
不过何以和微微一笑的男主剧版确实完胜影版。
【在 f******t 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 最不满的是演员太老,虽然井柏然和Baby比杨洋和郑爽没大几岁,但扮相差了很多。这
: 两看着不像本科生,倒像是辅导员,或是成人教育生,看着不容易入戏。井柏然也没有
: 大帅哥风采,总觉得他像谁,后来想明白他跟朱婷很像,。
: 再一个不满的是太现实,游戏里的人物和场景,没有游戏风格,化妆、衣着、言行举止
: ,不像虚幻世界,而像另一个现实世界。而现实的场景和人物,又有点太真实了,宿舍
: 、办公室凌乱,暴雨太过滂沱等等,干扰YY剧的憧憬和想象。
: 电影的编剧水平不行。没读过小说,感觉电视剧很忠实于小说,容易知道原作者要表达
: 的,以及粉丝喜欢的东西。而电影像是小说的系列插图,或者像电视剧的剪辑,太平淡
: 无趣了,没有创造性。总结一下,就是电影不如电视剧。
为什么这些偶像剧的影版都不如剧版?照理说电影的制作和主创团队都应该更有优势。
在想是不是有先入为主的原因,加上电视剧时间长,观众更容易培养出对角色的感情?
不过何以和微微一笑的男主剧版确实完胜影版。
【在 f******t 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 最不满的是演员太老,虽然井柏然和Baby比杨洋和郑爽没大几岁,但扮相差了很多。这
: 两看着不像本科生,倒像是辅导员,或是成人教育生,看着不容易入戏。井柏然也没有
: 大帅哥风采,总觉得他像谁,后来想明白他跟朱婷很像,。
: 再一个不满的是太现实,游戏里的人物和场景,没有游戏风格,化妆、衣着、言行举止
: ,不像虚幻世界,而像另一个现实世界。而现实的场景和人物,又有点太真实了,宿舍
: 、办公室凌乱,暴雨太过滂沱等等,干扰YY剧的憧憬和想象。
: 电影的编剧水平不行。没读过小说,感觉电视剧很忠实于小说,容易知道原作者要表达
: 的,以及粉丝喜欢的东西。而电影像是小说的系列插图,或者像电视剧的剪辑,太平淡
: 无趣了,没有创造性。总结一下,就是电影不如电视剧。
t*e
8 楼
消息来源靠谱嘛? 如果是真的,那确实是个利好消息
h*r
10 楼
井柏然象朱婷 😄😄😄😄😄
【在 f******t 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 最不满的是演员太老,虽然井柏然和Baby比杨洋和郑爽没大几岁,但扮相差了很多。这
: 两看着不像本科生,倒像是辅导员,或是成人教育生,看着不容易入戏。井柏然也没有
: 大帅哥风采,总觉得他像谁,后来想明白他跟朱婷很像,。
: 再一个不满的是太现实,游戏里的人物和场景,没有游戏风格,化妆、衣着、言行举止
: ,不像虚幻世界,而像另一个现实世界。而现实的场景和人物,又有点太真实了,宿舍
: 、办公室凌乱,暴雨太过滂沱等等,干扰YY剧的憧憬和想象。
: 电影的编剧水平不行。没读过小说,感觉电视剧很忠实于小说,容易知道原作者要表达
: 的,以及粉丝喜欢的东西。而电影像是小说的系列插图,或者像电视剧的剪辑,太平淡
: 无趣了,没有创造性。总结一下,就是电影不如电视剧。
【在 f******t 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 最不满的是演员太老,虽然井柏然和Baby比杨洋和郑爽没大几岁,但扮相差了很多。这
: 两看着不像本科生,倒像是辅导员,或是成人教育生,看着不容易入戏。井柏然也没有
: 大帅哥风采,总觉得他像谁,后来想明白他跟朱婷很像,。
: 再一个不满的是太现实,游戏里的人物和场景,没有游戏风格,化妆、衣着、言行举止
: ,不像虚幻世界,而像另一个现实世界。而现实的场景和人物,又有点太真实了,宿舍
: 、办公室凌乱,暴雨太过滂沱等等,干扰YY剧的憧憬和想象。
: 电影的编剧水平不行。没读过小说,感觉电视剧很忠实于小说,容易知道原作者要表达
: 的,以及粉丝喜欢的东西。而电影像是小说的系列插图,或者像电视剧的剪辑,太平淡
: 无趣了,没有创造性。总结一下,就是电影不如电视剧。
g*n
11 楼
The compromise mandates periodic DOL audits for H1B-dependent employers with
over 100 employees, and gives DOL sweeping new powers over all employers in
H1B matters. In return, the per-country limits are swept-aside, with
immediate positive benefits to Indian and Chinese nationals waiting for
employment immigration quotas for many years.
-------------
这个compromise的两项内容都对中国很有利
over 100 employees, and gives DOL sweeping new powers over all employers in
H1B matters. In return, the per-country limits are swept-aside, with
immediate positive benefits to Indian and Chinese nationals waiting for
employment immigration quotas for many years.
-------------
这个compromise的两项内容都对中国很有利
A*a
12 楼
电影里的男主角完全就是个猪哥脸,不明白这么多层出不穷的小鲜肉中怎么就挑了他。
女主角至少身材很好,加分。
那些配角,无论男女,又老又丑,看了令人绝望。
电视剧至少颜值这一块,无论主配,都让人赏析悦目,尤其是几位男配都是色艺双全,
后来被粉丝挖出得生活照中颜值居然比杨阳还要高。
电玩这一块要加分,太漂亮了,无论背景动画服饰和头饰,人人都是提高了一个层次。
尤其是二喜和真水的古装扮相,太抢眼了。
女主角至少身材很好,加分。
那些配角,无论男女,又老又丑,看了令人绝望。
电视剧至少颜值这一块,无论主配,都让人赏析悦目,尤其是几位男配都是色艺双全,
后来被粉丝挖出得生活照中颜值居然比杨阳还要高。
电玩这一块要加分,太漂亮了,无论背景动画服饰和头饰,人人都是提高了一个层次。
尤其是二喜和真水的古装扮相,太抢眼了。
t*j
13 楼
要是加个15%国家cap就是完美了,哈哈
n*e
17 楼
从冠冕堂皇的角度看,3012陡然提高了档次,即是fairness,又是anti-fraud。
t*j
23 楼
Eb3c距离row现在不过10个月,半年到一年内赶上row是可期的。
如果3012过了,大概不到半年就赶上row了,然后和row龟动。
所以3012有利的就是row 前的eb3c,受害最大的是07 08的eb3c.
至于long term, 老中eb3恐怕会比现在多多了。
Eb2c支持无可厚非,但是07 08eb3c利益是极大受害,如果你在那个位置上你就会强力
反对了。
[发表自未名空间手机版 - m.mitbbs.com]
【在 a***g 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 其实从eb3c的角度反对原来的3012的人也不是完全没有道理,但目前这个版本看来对中
: 国的2,3类都是利大于弊。一旦对icc的anti-fraud被认真执行,加上废除了偿还六四
: 血卡的规定,eb3c应该也能受益匪浅
如果3012过了,大概不到半年就赶上row了,然后和row龟动。
所以3012有利的就是row 前的eb3c,受害最大的是07 08的eb3c.
至于long term, 老中eb3恐怕会比现在多多了。
Eb2c支持无可厚非,但是07 08eb3c利益是极大受害,如果你在那个位置上你就会强力
反对了。
[发表自未名空间手机版 - m.mitbbs.com]
【在 a***g 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 其实从eb3c的角度反对原来的3012的人也不是完全没有道理,但目前这个版本看来对中
: 国的2,3类都是利大于弊。一旦对icc的anti-fraud被认真执行,加上废除了偿还六四
: 血卡的规定,eb3c应该也能受益匪浅
x*8
24 楼
井柏颜值可以,就是气质比较成熟,显得经过社会磨练,
拍校园剧把这一点突出了,
拍校园剧把这一点突出了,
l*g
27 楼
only way for eb3 is to port to eb2 after 5 yrs without fundamental change in
the immigration system
the immigration system
x*8
28 楼
估计女生大妈乐意看杨洋,李易峰之流,
我就觉得井柏然挺好,
李易峰我看就一大胖丫头,
杨洋好些,不过总端着也傻比,
: 电影里的男主角完全就是个猪哥脸,不明白这么多层出不穷的小鲜肉中怎么就挑
了他。
: 女主角至少身材很好,加分。
: 那些配角,无论男女,又老又丑,看了令人绝望。
: 电视剧至少颜值这一块,无论主配,都让人赏析悦目,尤其是几位男配都是色艺
双全,
: 后来被粉丝挖出得生活照中颜值居然比杨阳还要高。
: 电玩这一块要加分,太漂亮了,无论背景动画服饰和头饰,人人都是提高了一个
层次。
: 尤其是二喜和真水的古装扮相,太抢眼了。
【在 A*****a 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 电影里的男主角完全就是个猪哥脸,不明白这么多层出不穷的小鲜肉中怎么就挑了他。
: 女主角至少身材很好,加分。
: 那些配角,无论男女,又老又丑,看了令人绝望。
: 电视剧至少颜值这一块,无论主配,都让人赏析悦目,尤其是几位男配都是色艺双全,
: 后来被粉丝挖出得生活照中颜值居然比杨阳还要高。
: 电玩这一块要加分,太漂亮了,无论背景动画服饰和头饰,人人都是提高了一个层次。
: 尤其是二喜和真水的古装扮相,太抢眼了。
我就觉得井柏然挺好,
李易峰我看就一大胖丫头,
杨洋好些,不过总端着也傻比,
: 电影里的男主角完全就是个猪哥脸,不明白这么多层出不穷的小鲜肉中怎么就挑
了他。
: 女主角至少身材很好,加分。
: 那些配角,无论男女,又老又丑,看了令人绝望。
: 电视剧至少颜值这一块,无论主配,都让人赏析悦目,尤其是几位男配都是色艺
双全,
: 后来被粉丝挖出得生活照中颜值居然比杨阳还要高。
: 电玩这一块要加分,太漂亮了,无论背景动画服饰和头饰,人人都是提高了一个
层次。
: 尤其是二喜和真水的古装扮相,太抢眼了。
【在 A*****a 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 电影里的男主角完全就是个猪哥脸,不明白这么多层出不穷的小鲜肉中怎么就挑了他。
: 女主角至少身材很好,加分。
: 那些配角,无论男女,又老又丑,看了令人绝望。
: 电视剧至少颜值这一块,无论主配,都让人赏析悦目,尤其是几位男配都是色艺双全,
: 后来被粉丝挖出得生活照中颜值居然比杨阳还要高。
: 电玩这一块要加分,太漂亮了,无论背景动画服饰和头饰,人人都是提高了一个层次。
: 尤其是二喜和真水的古装扮相,太抢眼了。
S*r
29 楼
如果能够用格老加塞的条款大力打击人口贩子ICC
实在是大快人心的好事一件!
大家对于3012的争执
本质原因不是啥鸟毛中国人的劣根性
而是老印太多!造假的老印太多!
如果能够用新3012从根子上扼杀老印
以后老中之间的争执会少很多
实在是大快人心的好事一件!
大家对于3012的争执
本质原因不是啥鸟毛中国人的劣根性
而是老印太多!造假的老印太多!
如果能够用新3012从根子上扼杀老印
以后老中之间的争执会少很多
r*g
30 楼
别的不说,杨颖在影版里比郑爽漂亮太多了,更符合小说里的人物形象。
n*e
35 楼
阁老的修正案的力度刚刚好,把烙印也分化了.
S*9
37 楼
不知道是哪些律师反对,能不能有办法知道他们是谁以及他们背后的利益团体是谁,然
后剩下的就交给格老,肯定能钓出来大鱼(肯定是100人以上且多数造假H1B员工的ICC
猥琐公司)。
后剩下的就交给格老,肯定能钓出来大鱼(肯定是100人以上且多数造假H1B员工的ICC
猥琐公司)。
h*r
38 楼
肖奈出场,女生发疯的设定就是单纯搞笑用的,这个完全可以接受。
《太子妃升职记》里,九爷出场也是这样的,那些后宫佳丽一个个都跟北韩人民见到三
胖似的,晕倒一大片。相比之下,肖奈出场时众腐女表现得好太多了:D :D :D
说到二喜,她的造型跟学霸还有点儿象
【在 r*********y 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: hahaha,不要这么残酷的把大家拉回现实嘛
: 话说我觉得最夸张的两个点是
: 1.剧里二喜对着麻杆身材的微微说,你真的是34C吗?--想瞬间扣瞎自己的眼睛
: 2.每次肖奈出场,方圆十里所有女生迅速小跑集合围成一圈,所有人掏出手机,大神就
: 站在圆圈里摆个pose给大家拍照5分钟--每次看到这样的场景的地方(有n处)我都爆笑
: --YY剧果然必须把智商归0再看
《太子妃升职记》里,九爷出场也是这样的,那些后宫佳丽一个个都跟北韩人民见到三
胖似的,晕倒一大片。相比之下,肖奈出场时众腐女表现得好太多了:D :D :D
说到二喜,她的造型跟学霸还有点儿象
【在 r*********y 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: hahaha,不要这么残酷的把大家拉回现实嘛
: 话说我觉得最夸张的两个点是
: 1.剧里二喜对着麻杆身材的微微说,你真的是34C吗?--想瞬间扣瞎自己的眼睛
: 2.每次肖奈出场,方圆十里所有女生迅速小跑集合围成一圈,所有人掏出手机,大神就
: 站在圆圈里摆个pose给大家拍照5分钟--每次看到这样的场景的地方(有n处)我都爆笑
: --YY剧果然必须把智商归0再看
相关阅读