s*p
2 楼
各有什么特点？是不是学会一个就行了？
那么学那个那？
请高手瓷窖。
那么学那个那？
请高手瓷窖。
y*n
3 楼
算了，和谐一点。改改：
我们萎缩男自己的青春年华都还没顾得上呢，哪还有心思管费翔的？
我们萎缩男自己的青春年华都还没顾得上呢，哪还有心思管费翔的？
B*z
4 楼
用时间长乐就好了。
vi小，emacs大
基本功能一样多，emacs花哨工能多
emacs和cvs结合较好
vi简单，emacs常用快捷间多，不好上手
【在 s*****p 的大作中提到】
: 各有什么特点？是不是学会一个就行了？
: 那么学那个那？
: 请高手瓷窖。
vi小，emacs大
基本功能一样多，emacs花哨工能多
emacs和cvs结合较好
vi简单，emacs常用快捷间多，不好上手
【在 s*****p 的大作中提到】
: 各有什么特点？是不是学会一个就行了？
: 那么学那个那？
: 请高手瓷窖。
y*n
5 楼
缩男们都来说说自己的青春年华多可惜吧。别客气。
n*t
6 楼
vi你肯定要学,因为很有可能unix机器上没有emacs.
但是emacs学好了之后,其实用vi的机会就不是太多了.
【在 s*****p 的大作中提到】
: 各有什么特点？是不是学会一个就行了？
: 那么学那个那？
: 请高手瓷窖。
但是emacs学好了之后,其实用vi的机会就不是太多了.
【在 s*****p 的大作中提到】
: 各有什么特点？是不是学会一个就行了？
: 那么学那个那？
: 请高手瓷窖。
p*s
7 楼
vi is an editor,
emacs is a high-level OS, at least an IDE
quite different
【在 s*****p 的大作中提到】
: 各有什么特点？是不是学会一个就行了？
: 那么学那个那？
: 请高手瓷窖。
i*e
8 楼
learn both.
vi for small and quick editting jobs in a terminal.
emacs for your project-oriented editting and other stuff.
some packages in emacs are very useful and efficient.
calendar, gnus, dired, octave, calc, bbdb, dictionary,
auctex ... i can't work without emacs.
【在 n******t 的大作中提到】
: vi你肯定要学,因为很有可能unix机器上没有emacs.
: 但是emacs学好了之后,其实用vi的机会就不是太多了.
vi for small and quick editting jobs in a terminal.
emacs for your project-oriented editting and other stuff.
some packages in emacs are very useful and efficient.
calendar, gnus, dired, octave, calc, bbdb, dictionary,
auctex ... i can't work without emacs.
【在 n******t 的大作中提到】
: vi你肯定要学,因为很有可能unix机器上没有emacs.
: 但是emacs学好了之后,其实用vi的机会就不是太多了.
s*l
9 楼
I am not good at either one of them.
So I use both. hehe
【在 s*****p 的大作中提到】
: 各有什么特点？是不是学会一个就行了？
: 那么学那个那？
: 请高手瓷窖。
So I use both. hehe
【在 s*****p 的大作中提到】
: 各有什么特点？是不是学会一个就行了？
: 那么学那个那？
: 请高手瓷窖。
T*r
10 楼
I only use vi, because it's the first editor I've ever used.
Besides, it's small. I am always paranoid at disk space. :p
【在 s*****p 的大作中提到】
: 各有什么特点？是不是学会一个就行了？
: 那么学那个那？
: 请高手瓷窖。
Besides, it's small. I am always paranoid at disk space. :p
【在 s*****p 的大作中提到】
: 各有什么特点？是不是学会一个就行了？
: 那么学那个那？
: 请高手瓷窖。
r*a
11 楼
//hand
I only use vi, 'coz it is simple and efficient
For most tasks several scripts should be enough, no need to use emacs, kaka!
I am now using a 80GB hd with rh9 on it, no need to worry about disk space :-)
【在 T********r 的大作中提到】
: I only use vi, because it's the first editor I've ever used.
: Besides, it's small. I am always paranoid at disk space. :p
T*r
12 楼
My HD is 120GHz, but whenever the size of Linux system files is
near 1.7GB, I feel I have to delete some 'garbage' that I would
never use. ;-)
【在 r**a 的大作中提到】
:
: //hand
: I only use vi, 'coz it is simple and efficient
: For most tasks several scripts should be enough, no need to use emacs, kaka!
: I am now using a 80GB hd with rh9 on it, no need to worry about disk space :-)
r*a
13 楼
dude, u r somewhat paranoid, LOL!
【在 T********r 的大作中提到】
:
: My HD is 120GHz, but whenever the size of Linux system files is
: near 1.7GB, I feel I have to delete some 'garbage' that I would
: never use. ;-)
T*r
14 楼
hehe, I've traced my disk access for several months, and found that
the system files I accessed is no more than 150MB, but Linux occupies
more than 1.5GB! :-( Anyway, still much better than Windows since I
have almost everything - kernel, utilities, GUI, development tools,
etc. With 1.5GB in Windows, I would only have a raw system.
【在 r**a 的大作中提到】
:
: dude, u r somewhat paranoid, LOL!
the system files I accessed is no more than 150MB, but Linux occupies
more than 1.5GB! :-( Anyway, still much better than Windows since I
have almost everything - kernel, utilities, GUI, development tools,
etc. With 1.5GB in Windows, I would only have a raw system.
【在 r**a 的大作中提到】
:
: dude, u r somewhat paranoid, LOL!
r*a
15 楼
how to trace the disk access? any software available or you wrote one yourself?
Many files in windows can be deleted safely, hoho!
【在 T********r 的大作中提到】
: hehe, I've traced my disk access for several months, and found that
: the system files I accessed is no more than 150MB, but Linux occupies
: more than 1.5GB! :-( Anyway, still much better than Windows since I
: have almost everything - kernel, utilities, GUI, development tools,
: etc. With 1.5GB in Windows, I would only have a raw system.
r*a
16 楼
But I won't waste my time to deal with those craps
【在 r**a 的大作中提到】
:
: how to trace the disk access? any software available or you wrote one yourself?
: Many files in windows can be deleted safely, hoho!
n*t
17 楼
large fils are:
log, desktop, compile temp file, core.
even linux kernel src will occupy about 200MB.
【在 T********r 的大作中提到】
: hehe, I've traced my disk access for several months, and found that
: the system files I accessed is no more than 150MB, but Linux occupies
: more than 1.5GB! :-( Anyway, still much better than Windows since I
: have almost everything - kernel, utilities, GUI, development tools,
: etc. With 1.5GB in Windows, I would only have a raw system.
log, desktop, compile temp file, core.
even linux kernel src will occupy about 200MB.
【在 T********r 的大作中提到】
: hehe, I've traced my disk access for several months, and found that
: the system files I accessed is no more than 150MB, but Linux occupies
: more than 1.5GB! :-( Anyway, still much better than Windows since I
: have almost everything - kernel, utilities, GUI, development tools,
: etc. With 1.5GB in Windows, I would only have a raw system.
s*d
18 楼
vi
Once you know how to play with vi, you'll be banifet for the rest of
your life.
【在 s*****p 的大作中提到】
: 各有什么特点？是不是学会一个就行了？
: 那么学那个那？
: 请高手瓷窖。
a*a
19 楼
永恒得争论
【在 s*****p 的大作中提到】
: 各有什么特点？是不是学会一个就行了？
: 那么学那个那？
: 请高手瓷窖。
【在 s*****p 的大作中提到】
: 各有什么特点？是不是学会一个就行了？
: 那么学那个那？
: 请高手瓷窖。
T*r
20 楼
http://www.intersectalliance.com/projects/Snare/, trace interesting
file system calls. then write a simple program to calculate the size
of accessed files.
【在 r**a 的大作中提到】
:
: But I won't waste my time to deal with those craps
相关阅读