f*i
14 楼
无理,但不知道是不是超越
l*3
21 楼
一个相关的猜想如下:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schanuel's_conjecture
这问题我不懂.
我猜应该是无理数.
如果是有理数, 那意味着 pi 和 e 代数相关 (而且还他妈是一次幂), 你相信 Q(e)和
Q(pi) 是同一个东西吗? 我觉得不太可能.
【在 s**e 的大作中提到】
: π+e 是无理数吗?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schanuel's_conjecture
这问题我不懂.
我猜应该是无理数.
如果是有理数, 那意味着 pi 和 e 代数相关 (而且还他妈是一次幂), 你相信 Q(e)和
Q(pi) 是同一个东西吗? 我觉得不太可能.
【在 s**e 的大作中提到】
: π+e 是无理数吗?
s*r
26 楼
The information you are talking about comes from Wolfram MathWorld. This is
a trusted site and is a great resource for Mathematics. I read it alot and
find it helpful.
This is the whole quote from the article:
"It is not known if pi+e, pi/e, or ln pi are irrational. However, it is
known that they cannot satisfy any polynomial equation of degree <=8 with
integer coefficients of average size 10^9"
Another quote is:
"At least one of pi×e and pi+e (and probably both) are transcendental, but
transcendence has not been proven for either number on its own. It is not
known if e^e, pi^pi, pi^e, gamma (the Euler-Mascheroni constant), I_0(2), or
I_1(2) (where I_n(x) is a modified Bessel function of the first kind) are
transcendental. "
For π+e to be a rational number, it would need to be expressable as a/b
where a and b are integers. Therefore π=a/b - e would need to be true. As
would e = a/b - π. You would need to prove that π and e are algebraically
independent to prove that π+e is irrational.
The irrational part has to cancel out for the sum to be rational.
Source(s):
Weisstein, Eric W. "Pi." From MathWorld--A Wolfram Web Resource. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Pi.html
Weisstein, Eric W. "Transcendental Number." From MathWorld--A Wolfram Web
Resource. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/TranscendentalNumber.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_independence
a trusted site and is a great resource for Mathematics. I read it alot and
find it helpful.
This is the whole quote from the article:
"It is not known if pi+e, pi/e, or ln pi are irrational. However, it is
known that they cannot satisfy any polynomial equation of degree <=8 with
integer coefficients of average size 10^9"
Another quote is:
"At least one of pi×e and pi+e (and probably both) are transcendental, but
transcendence has not been proven for either number on its own. It is not
known if e^e, pi^pi, pi^e, gamma (the Euler-Mascheroni constant), I_0(2), or
I_1(2) (where I_n(x) is a modified Bessel function of the first kind) are
transcendental. "
For π+e to be a rational number, it would need to be expressable as a/b
where a and b are integers. Therefore π=a/b - e would need to be true. As
would e = a/b - π. You would need to prove that π and e are algebraically
independent to prove that π+e is irrational.
The irrational part has to cancel out for the sum to be rational.
Source(s):
Weisstein, Eric W. "Pi." From MathWorld--A Wolfram Web Resource. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Pi.html
Weisstein, Eric W. "Transcendental Number." From MathWorld--A Wolfram Web
Resource. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/TranscendentalNumber.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_independence
C*r
30 楼
貌似e*pi和e^(pi^2)中至少有一个超越。
is
but
【在 s**********r 的大作中提到】
: The information you are talking about comes from Wolfram MathWorld. This is
: a trusted site and is a great resource for Mathematics. I read it alot and
: find it helpful.
: This is the whole quote from the article:
: "It is not known if pi+e, pi/e, or ln pi are irrational. However, it is
: known that they cannot satisfy any polynomial equation of degree <=8 with
: integer coefficients of average size 10^9"
: Another quote is:
: "At least one of pi×e and pi+e (and probably both) are transcendental, but
: transcendence has not been proven for either number on its own. It is not
is
but
【在 s**********r 的大作中提到】
: The information you are talking about comes from Wolfram MathWorld. This is
: a trusted site and is a great resource for Mathematics. I read it alot and
: find it helpful.
: This is the whole quote from the article:
: "It is not known if pi+e, pi/e, or ln pi are irrational. However, it is
: known that they cannot satisfy any polynomial equation of degree <=8 with
: integer coefficients of average size 10^9"
: Another quote is:
: "At least one of pi×e and pi+e (and probably both) are transcendental, but
: transcendence has not been proven for either number on its own. It is not
I*t
35 楼
别说有理还是无理了,人们甚至不知道pi^(pi^(pi^pi))是不是一个整数
m*x
40 楼
数学家还是有很多事情可以做的。有没有实用价值另说哈
h*d
43 楼
证明
http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/51617.html
【在 C**********r 的大作中提到】
: 貌似pi+e和pi*e中最多有一个可以有理
http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/51617.html
【在 C**********r 的大作中提到】
: 貌似pi+e和pi*e中最多有一个可以有理
C*r
44 楼
哈,我们偷看的是同一个页面诶。
【在 h*d 的大作中提到】
: 证明
: http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/51617.html
【在 h*d 的大作中提到】
: 证明
: http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/51617.html
相关阅读
版猪为什么删我的贴?!油烟机坏了 换啥牌子好鼓的鼓的整天抱怨在美国受歧视的华人都是作什么工作的。 (转载)啧啧,这nile还是个铊粉增高血压的diet华人闲话: 我一般给优秀中国女生的建议还是找老美 (转载)绝非钓鱼:89岁老人shopping mall摔倒无人扶窒息身亡 (转载)中国是太乱?还是太自由?说弯曲贫困线30万的可以醒醒了,真不是一般的没常识。 (转载)每临大事有静气买买提几大怪人怎样做馅饼?华人跻身上流社会最重要的22条标准种族歧视的各种表现形式讨论 (转载)鳖共占领区钢铁产量增长如何? (转载)从恩爱两个字痛批中国人的婚姻观一句被刻意曲解的古话“穷养儿子富养女” (转载)开贴批八字 练手加拿大C-24法案出台,在美华人可能失去加拿大身份。