for weblog, the data supporsed to be huge. db is much better choice. 【 在 laurapc (小巧) 的大作中提到: 】
w*n
4 楼
agree. DB of course. Those XML-based stuffs are just programs from some standard APIs. Not sure about their liability and security. Traditional DBs are far better.
【在 h****e 的大作中提到】 : for weblog, the data supporsed to be huge. db is much better choice. : 【 在 laurapc (小巧) 的大作中提到: 】
IBM offers an XML security suite at alphaworks and it works well in our system. 【 在 Bliz (剑盾巫师) 的大作中提到: 】 全部
r*s
7 楼
and apache xml security library. use message level security by XML Encryption to store user passwd.
【在 w********c 的大作中提到】 : IBM offers an XML security suite at alphaworks and it works well in our : system. 【 在 Bliz (剑盾巫师) 的大作中提到: 】 : 全部
B*z
8 楼
still. not as secure as database. xml security is too premature.
【在 r*****s 的大作中提到】 : and apache xml security library. : use message level security by XML Encryption to store user passwd.
w*c
9 楼
You are right on this. It's not possible to compare the security feature of the XML with that of dabatases for now, and maybe even in the future. But Weblog is usually a standalone application which means that its content should be used for future data analysis, not for security issues like authentication, authorization and access control. I am not aware of any weblog that keeps password information. There is a trend to use XML in weblog because it can promote standardization, simplify informati
【在 B**z 的大作中提到】 : still. not as secure as database. : xml security is too premature.