Redian新闻
>
Re: Biochemistry这个杂志怎么样阿?(就是ACS的那个)
avatar
Re: Biochemistry这个杂志怎么样阿?(就是ACS的那个)# Biology - 生物学
l*e
1
JBC has a lot of solid raw data. That's why they are often quoted.
but most of the data is not sufficient enough to build a fun, sexy
story, and without that, the paper is destined to be out of favor
by top-notch journals. So JBC paper is usually boring and people
publish only because they have some data they need to publish, and
the data looks real and good.
Any good data with combination of an interesting story will for sure
go into a higher-tier category such as EMBO and NCB.

journal
as
avatar
R*s
2
very true.
JBS is a journal contain many good data as well as bad articles.
Whenever you have a journal contains so many materials each issue,
it happens.
As for whether JBC is better than biochemistry, overall it is, but
for specific cases it varies. Generally biochemistry takes more
biochem paper. For example, our lab published lots of stuff on JBC
for stories not invovling cell bio much. But the kinetics side always
go to biochem since kineticist actually it is better than JBC in
their area,

【在 l****e 的大作中提到】
: JBC has a lot of solid raw data. That's why they are often quoted.
: but most of the data is not sufficient enough to build a fun, sexy
: story, and without that, the paper is destined to be out of favor
: by top-notch journals. So JBC paper is usually boring and people
: publish only because they have some data they need to publish, and
: the data looks real and good.
: Any good data with combination of an interesting story will for sure
: go into a higher-tier category such as EMBO and NCB.
:
: journal

相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。