C*5
2 楼
不是说他喜欢看韩剧吗?反正闲着也是闲着
h*r
3 楼
居然没有看到新闻报道
http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v29/n4/full/nbt.1840.html
EU legitimizes GM crop exclusion zones
To the Editor:
On July 13, 2010, the European Commission (EC) officially proposed to give
member states the freedom to veto the cultivation of genetically modified (
GM) crops on their own territory without having to provide any scientific
evidence relating to new risks1. The objective of the legislation is
ostensibly to make individual member states responsible for their own policy
on GM crops, and therefore to speed up pending authorizations by removing
the ability of those member states to veto approval throughout the European
Union by avoiding a qualified majority (Fig. 1). However, we argue that the
opt-out will have exactly the opposite effect to that intended, allowing the
creation of arbitrary GM-free zones in Europe that will cause untold damage
to the EU economy and its global scientific standing.
http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v29/n4/full/nbt.1840.html
EU legitimizes GM crop exclusion zones
To the Editor:
On July 13, 2010, the European Commission (EC) officially proposed to give
member states the freedom to veto the cultivation of genetically modified (
GM) crops on their own territory without having to provide any scientific
evidence relating to new risks1. The objective of the legislation is
ostensibly to make individual member states responsible for their own policy
on GM crops, and therefore to speed up pending authorizations by removing
the ability of those member states to veto approval throughout the European
Union by avoiding a qualified majority (Fig. 1). However, we argue that the
opt-out will have exactly the opposite effect to that intended, allowing the
creation of arbitrary GM-free zones in Europe that will cause untold damage
to the EU economy and its global scientific standing.
R*s
4 楼
瘦一点的都行。。。
h*r
5 楼
policy
【在 h****r 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 居然没有看到新闻报道
: http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v29/n4/full/nbt.1840.html
: EU legitimizes GM crop exclusion zones
: To the Editor:
: On July 13, 2010, the European Commission (EC) officially proposed to give
: member states the freedom to veto the cultivation of genetically modified (
: GM) crops on their own territory without having to provide any scientific
: evidence relating to new risks1. The objective of the legislation is
: ostensibly to make individual member states responsible for their own policy
: on GM crops, and therefore to speed up pending authorizations by removing
k*1
6 楼
下次试试
s*y
7 楼
美国是生产转基因农作物的大本营,这种负面消息当然不会大作旗鼓
policy
【在 h****r 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 居然没有看到新闻报道
: http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v29/n4/full/nbt.1840.html
: EU legitimizes GM crop exclusion zones
: To the Editor:
: On July 13, 2010, the European Commission (EC) officially proposed to give
: member states the freedom to veto the cultivation of genetically modified (
: GM) crops on their own territory without having to provide any scientific
: evidence relating to new risks1. The objective of the legislation is
: ostensibly to make individual member states responsible for their own policy
: on GM crops, and therefore to speed up pending authorizations by removing
policy
【在 h****r 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 居然没有看到新闻报道
: http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v29/n4/full/nbt.1840.html
: EU legitimizes GM crop exclusion zones
: To the Editor:
: On July 13, 2010, the European Commission (EC) officially proposed to give
: member states the freedom to veto the cultivation of genetically modified (
: GM) crops on their own territory without having to provide any scientific
: evidence relating to new risks1. The objective of the legislation is
: ostensibly to make individual member states responsible for their own policy
: on GM crops, and therefore to speed up pending authorizations by removing
相关阅读
有没有人考虑过转行护理PHD现在能体外培养造血干细胞了吗有没有这可能:NgAgo37度没活性,而在PCR时切DNA?韩教授事件最新进展如何?韩粉韩黑不妨都看看这个招聘信息韩春雨要上长江学者了qvalue仇老师声明的解释不仅仅协和人会造假,协和人造假是成双结对求助: 除了韩春雨,北京协和医学院的人从来不造假吗?【周末随笔】方舟子●张锋●韩春雨●水军说起造假,诺奖Linda Buck是最高级吧寻找访问学者职位jiaxiaofang都杀到微信公众号了,多大仇争议升级: ISTT质疑韩春雨实验可重复性, 却遭专家质疑其权威性施一公团队又发了两篇science,当他的学生真是幸福死了春秋战国时期,人类是如何生火的?韩春雨的专利仅有的两个发明人之一为什么不是高峰而是沈啸?跪求职业发展建议呼吁仇子龙公开测序数据