d*s
2 楼
We have now received reports from 4 referees on your manuscript. As you will
see, the referees have raised serious criticisms that preclude publication
of your work at this stage in Nature Medicine. We have therefore closed your
file, so that you may submit your work elsewhere without further delay, if
so you choose.
The referees are somewhat split in their views of the interest of the work,
with referees #3 and #4 expressing interest in principle, whereas referee #2
feels that evidence that the findings are relevant to human disease would
be needed to increase the interest of the work, and referee #1 feels that
the advance is relatively modest. In addition, the referees feel that the
findings are somewhat preliminary and that a large amount of additional
experimentation would be needed, and also raise a number of serious
methodological concerns.
I am sorry that we cannot be more positive on this occasion. Although it
seems that extensive new experimental data would be needed to address the
referees' concerns, we would in principle be willing to consider a revised
version of this manuscript that did substantively address all of their
concerns, provided that the novelty of your submission has not been
compromised in the interim.
In case of an eventual resubmission, we will need, in addition to the
revised manuscript and figures, a detailed, point-by-point account of how
you have responded to each of the referees' comments. You can use the link
below to resubmit your manuscript:
http://
We hope you will find the referees' comments useful, and thank you for
giving us the opportunity to review your work.
see, the referees have raised serious criticisms that preclude publication
of your work at this stage in Nature Medicine. We have therefore closed your
file, so that you may submit your work elsewhere without further delay, if
so you choose.
The referees are somewhat split in their views of the interest of the work,
with referees #3 and #4 expressing interest in principle, whereas referee #2
feels that evidence that the findings are relevant to human disease would
be needed to increase the interest of the work, and referee #1 feels that
the advance is relatively modest. In addition, the referees feel that the
findings are somewhat preliminary and that a large amount of additional
experimentation would be needed, and also raise a number of serious
methodological concerns.
I am sorry that we cannot be more positive on this occasion. Although it
seems that extensive new experimental data would be needed to address the
referees' concerns, we would in principle be willing to consider a revised
version of this manuscript that did substantively address all of their
concerns, provided that the novelty of your submission has not been
compromised in the interim.
In case of an eventual resubmission, we will need, in addition to the
revised manuscript and figures, a detailed, point-by-point account of how
you have responded to each of the referees' comments. You can use the link
below to resubmit your manuscript:
http://
We hope you will find the referees' comments useful, and thank you for
giving us the opportunity to review your work.
a*n
3 楼
有。别写错理由，比如说帮带孩子啥的。
【在 r********e 的大作中提到】
: 第一次B2延期申请有被拒的吗？
【在 r********e 的大作中提到】
: 第一次B2延期申请有被拒的吗？
s*z
4 楼
it's re-submission, not bad.
good luck!
good luck!
r*e
5 楼
just said they need more time to travel and do shopping
相关阅读
求教K grant申请Review小郁闷了把，editor居然没等到审稿意见返回就决定文章发表与否？Microarray的数据呈现paper help生物千老今天悲摧的始作俑者就是沃森，从他剽窃DNA双螺旋开始shRNA resistant mutant-------求一篇paper------thanks---------问一个猥琐的问题--Travel Awards千老到底指什么?(ZZ)公派博后的困惑zt招博后为何不引入性格测试压力测试和智商测试？牛牛们推荐个fixation的办法GFP, RFP，BFP共表达求paper 一篇招聘广告（转载）Paper help please!!求离子通道相关的审稿机会！找博后的推荐信是让推荐人直接寄吗？IF5-10分的杂志哪个发文的快些？谁能贴一个美国一流生物研究所/大学的名单吗?