avatar
O*z
1
continued from my last post on the manuscript. My boss takes some time to
revise the manuscript, and sends me the final version. I am surprised to see
, in the author acknowledgement', the paper was written by the Boss and the
experiments was performed by me but designed by the boss. The final
manuscript has lots of excerpts from my writing, and the flow of the ideas
is quite similar. Even in the discussion part, it's 80% at least similar to
mine.
I also designed at least 50% of the experiments. But I won't make any
argument, my single goal is to get the paper published and move on. what do
you guys think?
avatar
y*n
2
可以自己改动下,把written跟design部分老板名字后面加上你的,什么都不说发给老
板,看看他说什么
如果他也什么都不说,你不就赚到了
avatar
D*a
3
为啥这些话都不说呢。
也许你老板就是copy了其他一篇文章的author contribution改了改名字而已
avatar
O*z
5
No, the boss is tenured already. I guess this is just the personality.

【在 l**********1 的大作中提到】
: LZ boss is tenure tracking AP/PI?
: if Yes, s/he will write below:
: >the paper was written by the Boss and the
: from s/he needs more and more papers contribution for her/his tenuring.
: http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/Biology/31661289.html
: see
: the
: to
: do

avatar
l*1
6
Move On soon
try to find next NAS PI/Boss or at least HHMI PI
from you noted personality may be harder to become one membership of above
groups.

【在 O*z 的大作中提到】
: No, the boss is tenured already. I guess this is just the personality.
avatar
I*a
7
这问题很大??
相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。