Redian新闻
>
Nature will offer double blind review [zz]
avatar
Nature will offer double blind review [zz]# Biology - 生物学
t*g
1
橄榄油?花生油?普通菜油?
avatar
f*e
2
一个96年的房子,Seller disclosure上说:
previous treatment for termites on 4/8/11,
但是Seller对:
active infection of termites or other wood destroying insects,
previous termites or other insects damage repair,
termites or other insects damage needing repair
都说是没有.
大家觉得有白蚁的可能性大吗? 还是老一些的房子都需要定时做这种termites
treatment来防止白蚁?
avatar
z*e
3
本来店里10几个,卖了一个月一直没缺货过,前几天被人捅到sd上,马上就卖光了
avatar
M*P
4
https://www.genomeweb.com/scan/double-blind-review
Currently, the journal follows a single-blind system in which the reviewers
are anonymous, but they know the identities of the authors whose manuscript
they are reviewing. In this new option, the reviewers would remain anonymous
and they would not know whose paper they are reviewing.
Such an approach, proponents say, would eliminate biases based on gender,
institutional affiliation, researcher reputation, and more.
However, Nature notes that others have been lobbying for open peer review in
which the names of both the authors and reviewers are known. This model,
advocates say, would increase transparency. The journal notes that it tested
open peer review a few years ago, but the option wasn't popular.
Instead, it says that multiple surveys have indicated that double-blind
review would be a popular option, though it notes that tests at Nature
Geoscience and Nature Climate Change have had lower uptake than expected
based on such survey results. Still, Nature notes that the responses from
the authors who took that route has been positive, and it has detected no
difference in review quality.
It adds that making manuscripts anonymous will be the responsibility of the
authors and that in some small fields, true anonymity may not be possible.
avatar
C*E
5
一般是菜油。其实无所谓,当不着您能喜欢掺着橄榄味儿的辣油。。。
呵呵
avatar
l*a
6
有可能是这个地区的房子都需要做白蚁预防。

【在 f****e 的大作中提到】
: 一个96年的房子,Seller disclosure上说:
: previous treatment for termites on 4/8/11,
: 但是Seller对:
: active infection of termites or other wood destroying insects,
: previous termites or other insects damage repair,
: termites or other insects damage needing repair
: 都说是没有.
: 大家觉得有白蚁的可能性大吗? 还是老一些的房子都需要定时做这种termites
: treatment来防止白蚁?

avatar
K*n
7
哈哈,要不是上了SD我就买不着了,这价格几乎是正常价一半了,不知道这个牌子怎么样

【在 z*********e 的大作中提到】
: 本来店里10几个,卖了一个月一直没缺货过,前几天被人捅到sd上,马上就卖光了
avatar
j*n
8
不知道效果如何
尤其是对大牛实验室的 看文风/参考文献就能猜出来

reviewers
manuscript
anonymous
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 8.7

【在 M*P 的大作中提到】
: https://www.genomeweb.com/scan/double-blind-review
: Currently, the journal follows a single-blind system in which the reviewers
: are anonymous, but they know the identities of the authors whose manuscript
: they are reviewing. In this new option, the reviewers would remain anonymous
: and they would not know whose paper they are reviewing.
: Such an approach, proponents say, would eliminate biases based on gender,
: institutional affiliation, researcher reputation, and more.
: However, Nature notes that others have been lobbying for open peer review in
: which the names of both the authors and reviewers are known. This model,
: advocates say, would increase transparency. The journal notes that it tested

avatar
n*l
9
红油是取调料的香味,油本身味道淡比较好
avatar
f*e
10
该区的其他房子没有做这个东西.
而且他做的时间是房子上了list之后.

【在 l******a 的大作中提到】
: 有可能是这个地区的房子都需要做白蚁预防。
avatar
a*8
11
这是Sata3的M.2,不是NVMe的,最近颗粒涨价,正常价格应该在70-80左右

么样

【在 K*******n 的大作中提到】
: 哈哈,要不是上了SD我就买不着了,这价格几乎是正常价一半了,不知道这个牌子怎么样
avatar
l*y
12
把reviewer的意见跟paper一起发表,是不是公正一眼就能看出来
embo journal已经这么干了

reviewers
manuscript
anonymous
in
tested

【在 M*P 的大作中提到】
: https://www.genomeweb.com/scan/double-blind-review
: Currently, the journal follows a single-blind system in which the reviewers
: are anonymous, but they know the identities of the authors whose manuscript
: they are reviewing. In this new option, the reviewers would remain anonymous
: and they would not know whose paper they are reviewing.
: Such an approach, proponents say, would eliminate biases based on gender,
: institutional affiliation, researcher reputation, and more.
: However, Nature notes that others have been lobbying for open peer review in
: which the names of both the authors and reviewers are known. This model,
: advocates say, would increase transparency. The journal notes that it tested

avatar
l*a
13
seller's disclosure上面这几项都是打no?
我遇到一个有过白蚁问题的房子有把处理的时间和公司名称都写出来了,曾经有过问题
这项是选了yes。这个做inspection的时候白蚁问题也是可以检查出来的。

【在 f****e 的大作中提到】
: 该区的其他房子没有做这个东西.
: 而且他做的时间是房子上了list之后.

avatar
K*n
14
看来也没便宜多少,我准备拿来转成PCIE装上,sata妈板上已经满了,对性能有影响吗?

【在 a******8 的大作中提到】
: 这是Sata3的M.2,不是NVMe的,最近颗粒涨价,正常价格应该在70-80左右
:
: 么样

avatar
x*h
15
除非把经过审稿但被据的也发出来,不然对于大杂志来说这有什么用?而明显无法把被
拒的也发出来,那样这些文章还怎么嫁人?

【在 l***y 的大作中提到】
: 把reviewer的意见跟paper一起发表,是不是公正一眼就能看出来
: embo journal已经这么干了
:
: reviewers
: manuscript
: anonymous
: in
: tested

avatar
f*e
16
active infection of termites or other wood destroying insects,
previous termites or other insects damage repair,
termites or other insects damage needing repair
这三项都选了no
previous treatment for termites
选了yes,有一个说明说是4/8做的treatment.

【在 l******a 的大作中提到】
: seller's disclosure上面这几项都是打no?
: 我遇到一个有过白蚁问题的房子有把处理的时间和公司名称都写出来了,曾经有过问题
: 这项是选了yes。这个做inspection的时候白蚁问题也是可以检查出来的。

avatar
t*u
17
我这还有10+

【在 z*********e 的大作中提到】
: 本来店里10几个,卖了一个月一直没缺货过,前几天被人捅到sd上,马上就卖光了
avatar
N*K
18
lol

【在 l***y 的大作中提到】
: 把reviewer的意见跟paper一起发表,是不是公正一眼就能看出来
: embo journal已经这么干了
:
: reviewers
: manuscript
: anonymous
: in
: tested

avatar
l*a
19
那可能因为要卖房子,先做了白蚁预防。反正如果有过白蚁,inspectation能看得出来
的,不用太担心。

【在 f****e 的大作中提到】
: active infection of termites or other wood destroying insects,
: previous termites or other insects damage repair,
: termites or other insects damage needing repair
: 这三项都选了no
: previous treatment for termites
: 选了yes,有一个说明说是4/8做的treatment.

avatar
l*d
20
上sd都好几次了,过几天就又上货了

【在 z*********e 的大作中提到】
: 本来店里10几个,卖了一个月一直没缺货过,前几天被人捅到sd上,马上就卖光了
avatar
M*P
21
但是你没发确定你猜的对。我觉得这么做还是有很大好处的。防止审稿人看人下菜碟。

【在 j****n 的大作中提到】
: 不知道效果如何
: 尤其是对大牛实验室的 看文风/参考文献就能猜出来
:
: reviewers
: manuscript
: anonymous
: ★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 8.7

avatar
d*0
22
为啥我买了总被cancel?

【在 l******d 的大作中提到】
: 上sd都好几次了,过几天就又上货了
avatar
s*y
23
这个很难做到吧。比方说有的文章里会说,“我们组以前的研究里面提到过xxx",
然后从引文里一看就知道是谁了。

reviewers
manuscript
anonymous
in
tested

【在 M*P 的大作中提到】
: https://www.genomeweb.com/scan/double-blind-review
: Currently, the journal follows a single-blind system in which the reviewers
: are anonymous, but they know the identities of the authors whose manuscript
: they are reviewing. In this new option, the reviewers would remain anonymous
: and they would not know whose paper they are reviewing.
: Such an approach, proponents say, would eliminate biases based on gender,
: institutional affiliation, researcher reputation, and more.
: However, Nature notes that others have been lobbying for open peer review in
: which the names of both the authors and reviewers are known. This model,
: advocates say, would increase transparency. The journal notes that it tested

avatar
l*d
24
因为没去local店买哈

【在 d*****0 的大作中提到】
: 为啥我买了总被cancel?
avatar
n*7
25
所有可以推断作者的语句都列为作弊行为就ok了

【在 s******y 的大作中提到】
: 这个很难做到吧。比方说有的文章里会说,“我们组以前的研究里面提到过xxx",
: 然后从引文里一看就知道是谁了。
:
: reviewers
: manuscript
: anonymous
: in
: tested

avatar
M*P
26
应该在info for author 里面加一条说不能直接或者间接在文中暴露自己身份,哈哈。

【在 s******y 的大作中提到】
: 这个很难做到吧。比方说有的文章里会说,“我们组以前的研究里面提到过xxx",
: 然后从引文里一看就知道是谁了。
:
: reviewers
: manuscript
: anonymous
: in
: tested

avatar
v*m
27
完全可以doubleblind review,有结果后double open出版。大家都爽快些。

reviewers
manuscript
anonymous
in
tested

【在 M*P 的大作中提到】
: https://www.genomeweb.com/scan/double-blind-review
: Currently, the journal follows a single-blind system in which the reviewers
: are anonymous, but they know the identities of the authors whose manuscript
: they are reviewing. In this new option, the reviewers would remain anonymous
: and they would not know whose paper they are reviewing.
: Such an approach, proponents say, would eliminate biases based on gender,
: institutional affiliation, researcher reputation, and more.
: However, Nature notes that others have been lobbying for open peer review in
: which the names of both the authors and reviewers are known. This model,
: advocates say, would increase transparency. The journal notes that it tested

avatar
v*m
28
应该说xx组以前的工作提到过,用第三人称写作。

【在 s******y 的大作中提到】
: 这个很难做到吧。比方说有的文章里会说,“我们组以前的研究里面提到过xxx",
: 然后从引文里一看就知道是谁了。
:
: reviewers
: manuscript
: anonymous
: in
: tested

avatar
c*u
29
reviewer 看人下菜,这个也许可以解决。但是最重要的是编辑看人下菜啊。 我知道的
大牛,直接给编辑施压,reviewer的意见根本不take, 直接接受。
avatar
i*0
30
这种情况就导致以后大家不骂reviewer开始骂编辑了。
好多好文章都是因为老板不在圈子里面,不够牛,直接过不了editor这一关。
而且nature这样做,应该会控制送审的数量,来达到一样对大牛献媚的目的。
avatar
r*8
31
编辑那里也盲不就好了,做完决定才知道文章是谁投的

★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 1.0.1

【在 c*****u 的大作中提到】
: reviewer 看人下菜,这个也许可以解决。但是最重要的是编辑看人下菜啊。 我知道的
: 大牛,直接给编辑施压,reviewer的意见根本不take, 直接接受。

avatar
r*q
32
能申nature档次类似研究的人应该不难猜出来吧?尤其还交流开会,其实审稿人和作者
都大致可以互相猜出来的

【在 M*P 的大作中提到】
: 但是你没发确定你猜的对。我觉得这么做还是有很大好处的。防止审稿人看人下菜碟。
avatar
q*g
33
昨天听BMC MEDICINE的编辑说,80%的文章是被编辑据掉的。剩下的20%里,只有10%被
据掉。 可见编辑的作用有多大,特别是那些好的杂志,每年收到的投稿那么多,编辑
要选择哪些送出去review,大牛的名字肯定是考虑因素之一。
avatar
T*g
34
容易自己文章送到自己组

【在 r******8 的大作中提到】
: 编辑那里也盲不就好了,做完决定才知道文章是谁投的
:
: ★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 1.0.1

avatar
w*h
35
最近审了一片双盲的综述,
看看引的文献里面的内容,就知道是斯坦福的一个朋友的,
不过只能知道通讯作者是谁,不知道第一作者是谁。。。

【在 s******y 的大作中提到】
: 这个很难做到吧。比方说有的文章里会说,“我们组以前的研究里面提到过xxx",
: 然后从引文里一看就知道是谁了。
:
: reviewers
: manuscript
: anonymous
: in
: tested

相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。