捷克白妞女科学家新冠必须美国造原文 (转载) - 未名空间MITBBS历史存档

捷克白妞女科学家新冠必须美国造原文 (转载)# Biology - 生物学

L*Q2020-03-31 07:03

1 楼

准备定ＵＡ回国的机票，打算申请一张信用卡，　请有经验的朋友讲解一下，或给个版
上连接，　包子答谢。
1）chase sapphire
2）Chase sapphire prefered card
3) united mileage plus card

l*22020-03-31 07:03

2 楼

【以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区】
发信人: lubbock12 (非老非小将), 信区: Military
标题: 捷克白妞女科学家新冠必须美国造原文
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Mar 31 11:30:41 2020, 美东)
她提出了一个观点就是control room, 核心思想是如果新冠是自然突变的，而且是这么
明显的突变，那么它会马上启动damage control自毁机制的，不会在自然界中存活长久
她还说美国科学家那篇说新冠是自然起源的文章是受美国政府指使的
https://www.dimsumdaily.hk/czech-molecular-biologist-dr-sona-pekova-explains
-in-layman-terms-that-covid-19-virus-originates-from-a-lab-in-u-s-and-not-
china/
30th March 2020 – (Prague) A Czech molecular biologist, Dr. Soňa Peková
explained in detail why she believed that the novel coronavirus originated
from the laboratory in the U.S. and not in China. She also tried to disprove
the claim which appeared on Nature Medicine journal that the virus evolved
from a natural mutation.
Dr. Soňa Peková revealed the shocking exposé in lay man’s terms. She has
become literally a Czech national celebrity and star in the last few days,
not only because her laboratory was the first in the Czech Republic to test
one of the first cases infected with novel coronavirus but she also
developed a new and cheap method to test this virus. During her interview
with the Slovak news channel TA3, where she openly talked about the origin
of Sars-Cov-2 virus and explained in detail to the host in detail why she
thinks COVID-19 originated in the laboratory and not a natural mutation
found in infected animals. It does not happen too often that a leading
biologist can explain to ordinary laymen how it is recognized that some
virus originates from the laboratory and another is not.
In the interview, Dr. Peková explained that viruses generally consist of
RNA strands that tend to mutate, change, merge and alter, especially in
those RNA sections that take care of protein production. In this region of
RNA, the changes are so dynamic that the influence of nature is natural and
mutations from natural cycles are the most common form of mutation. However,
each virus and each of its RNAs has something called a “control room”, a
control site that controls mutations in the rest of the RNA. This region of
RNA at the very beginning of the helix could be compared to any boot sector
on the computer disk from which the operating system itself is booting.
Basically, this can be thought of as a BIOS interface. And when biologists
look at this piece of RNA, they just don’t go together.
The novel coronavirus RNA control centre looks like somebody who turned it
upside down and it still works perfectly. From the biologist’s point of
view, it looks as if, figuratively speaking, someone has invaded the
headquarters of this RNA control room, turned it all up there, throwing away
all the cabinets and drawers in such a way that it is very hard to believe
on the one hand, this process originated accidentally in nature, and on the
other hand, that this chaotic and accidental process would not kill the
virus.
Dr. Peková shows the regulatory part of Coronavirus RNA where the so-called
control room is located. Picture credit : AE NEWS
Indeed, the RNA control room itself is the main point of controlling the
mutation of the rest of the RNA, and in this case it would mean that we
should believe that in nature somehow the inserter and the control room of
the virus were rewritten to perfection without destroying the virus function
. And that’s why Dr. Pekova believes that novel coronavirus could have
originated in the lab, because such fundamental changes in the RNA control
room of the virus would naturally not have occurred in the case, without
destroying the virus.
In an interview, Dr. Peková explained that the RNA virus functioned in such
a clear way that it caused horror at certain places. Her explanation of
what had happened in the RNA control room of this virus had crossed the line
of separating incomprehensible information from the general public. She
explained to the viewers that there had been massive gene changes and
transcripts, insertions (deletions), deletions (deletions), and other
complex changes in the magnitude of the RNA Sars-Cov-2 control room, if
nature had created it chaotically and randomly, the virus would simply
perish because it could not have functioned in an orderly manner.
She explained in an understandable way to ordinary people how the virus
works, intense “damage control” is triggered somewhere else with the sole
aim of denying this information and impersonating it as a natural, albeit
unusual, natural mutation without any intervention of man and his
laboratories. She claimed that the US government issued an order to American
scientists to deny this information. US government urged scientists to
write counter-analysis refuting Chinese accusations and also statements by
the Czech molecular biologist several days ago. It was more like a crisis
management to refute all the information that the novel coronavirus
originated in the laboratory.
The paradox is that DrPeková made reference to a laboratory in Wuhan, that
is the well-known National Biosafety Laboratory at the Wuhan Institute of
Virology and she said that it is not China that needs to refute anything
about this theory.
The analysis itself is full of scientific and biological phrases and
information about the genome, which may not tell us much, but only the
introduction and the end of this text will be pinned from the document
itself. As it turns out, this is not a comprehensive scientific study, but
rather a political proclamation to protect the US that US laboratories are
not behind the gene manipulation of novel coronavirus. The article on Nature
Medicine journal itself published on 17th March this year is called ‘COVID
-19 coronavirus epidemic has a natural origin’ and in its introduction
completely excludes the laboratory origin of novel coronavirus. The
introduction to the analysis reads: ‘An analysis of public genome sequence
data from SARS-CoV-2 and related viruses found no evidence that the virus
was made in a laboratory or otherwise engineered.’
Study co-author Andrew Rambaut in the article cautioned that ‘it is
difficult if not impossible to know at this point which of the scenarios is
most likely. If the SARS-CoV-2 entered humans in its current pathogenic form
from an animal source, it raises the probability of future outbreaks, as
the illness-causing strain of the virus could still be circulating in the
animal population and might once again jump into humans. The chances are
lower of a non-pathogenic coronavirus entering the human population and then
evolving properties similar to SARS-CoV-2.’
Peková working at her laboratory. Picture credit : AE NEWS
On the other hand, the motive of the US military is clear, it is fleeing
viral infection from Europe and there will be no Defender 2020 exercise this
year (This year’s exercise was planned to simulate a fictional near-peer
competitor in a post-Article V environment set in the year 2028). So, from
the categorical statement in the second paragraph at the beginning of the
analysis which shows that the novel coronavirus is not a laboratory product,
she came to the conclusion that it is currently impossible to prove or
disprove the described theories of the origin of novel coronavirus, and that
the theory is only “Unreliable”. She understood why American scientists
have adopted this approach because they want to keep the door open for the
future, in case it breaks and the truth is open to the public. Scientists
don’t want to risk their discrediting as part of the US government’s
political campaign and damage control management where information is
leaking and China accused the US of sending troops to China to plant the
virus during Military World Games that took place in Wuhan last October.
The US military has de facto silently abolished the largest NATO exercise in
Europe since the end of the Cold War, Defender 2020. The reason for the
abolition of the exercise is the Covid-19 infection that is currently raging
across Europe. However, this is an absolutely unprecedented step, because
in Europe, American soldiers and military vessels were already deployed.
Everything was planned and it suddenly came to an abrupt end. With SARS,
MERS epidemics, all possible avian and swine flu in the past, the US
military did not interfere with any operations and major exercises. Why then
suddenly, because of novel coronavirus, the biggest NATO exercise in Europe
in 30 years has stopped? Did the Americans bring a biological weapon to
Wuhan last October, which mutated and, instead of infecting only Chinese
people, the virus now invades everybody and, as it turns out, mainly
Europeans? The reason is obvious, the American generals seem to know very
well what novel coronavirus is and where it came from, where the virus was
created. If the Pentagon never does anything, it is exposing its own army to
its own biological weapons. And it is novel coronavirus, according to all
information, not only according to the opinion of Dr Peková, and not only
according to the claims of the Chinese government that really comes from
some laboratory program, and we can speculate that it may be a biological
weapons program of the US Army and US Navy respectively. It all fits into a
picture together perfectly. In October 2019, the Military World Games was
held in Wuhan and attended by an American military delegation of athletes. A
novel coronavirus epidemic occurred in Wuhan in December 2019. At that time
, European media said that the virus originated due to poor hygiene and
insufficient heat treatment of Chinese traditional foods sold on the street
of China.
Virus analysis on computer. Picture credit : AE NEWS
In just two months, the contagion reached Italy in Europe and the Czech
government in its naivety declares that it would not control the Southern
border of tourists returning by car from holidays in Italy. A month later,
the whole of Europe was in crisis, emergency states were announced. In the
light of this contagion, NATO is cancelling the biggest military exercise
since 1989. If nothing else, NATO has just shown its weakness to Russia that
it is enough to spread the virus in Europe and NATO is completely shut down
. Many NATO countries have disagreed with abolishing the Defender 2020
exercise, but the Americans obviously knew what they were doing. Can a more
severe flu stifle NATO’s largest military manoeuvres in Europe since 1989?
And can a virus from a research laboratory do it? Apparently yes. Abolishing
the Defender 2020 exercise is also perhaps an attempt to avoid sending out
misleading signals if it turns out that some NATO countries will refuse to
participate in the exercise due to the viral threat. And that would be an
indication of NATO disunity, fear of viral contagion, etc. The Pentagon’s
decision was certainly not easy because, according to the latest information
, 9,000 US troops out of a total of 20,000 were to be deployed to Europe in
the near future.
Instead of Defender 2020, there will be a minor routine military exercise of
artillery, armoured vehicles and aircraft in the Baltic, but to a limited
extent and format. All because of the virus, which, paradoxically, even
according to American scientists, from this analysis is still unclear and
inconclusive. When China openly accused the US of planting a virus in Wuhan,
it is a scandal. As well as the confession of CDC chief Robert Redfield
that in the US people were dying of novel coronavirus at a time when no one
in the US knew about novel coronavirus, and death was originally attributed
to influenza and only recently was found to die from novel coronavirus
clearly reveals a very scary context. Dr. Peková may have revealed more to
the world than she might suspect.
Meanwhile, Lawyer Larry Klayman and his group Freedom Watch has filed a
class-action lawsuit against China at the federal court in Texas seeking at
least US$20 trillion from the Chinese government because of its “callous
and reckless indifference and malicious acts.” Researchers and public
health experts have repeated shot down the conspiracy theory that the
coronavirus was man-made, with studies showing that it originated as an
animal virus that eventually jumped to humans. Nonetheless, the claim has
gained traction on the right, with conservative media figures seizing upon
it to advocate for a more aggressive U.S. posture toward China.

D*y2020-03-31 07:03

3 楼

如果是UA的机票的话,个人建议申张UA的卡.首先这两张卡对于UA的航空累计都是2%, UA
的卡还能有club pass进机场VIP厅,而且兑换里程票UA卡能多不少选择. sapphire就没
啥考虑的了,sapphire preferred一直都是开卡花3k刀给4w点, UA的卡嘛看自己账户有
没有5w的link咯,否则只有3w的.

d*a2020-03-31 07:03

4 楼

sapphire 在ur买有3*points

UA

【在 D******y 的大作中提到】

: 如果是UA的机票的话,个人建议申张UA的卡.首先这两张卡对于UA的航空累计都是2%, UA
: 的卡还能有club pass进机场VIP厅,而且兑换里程票UA卡能多不少选择. sapphire就没
: 啥考虑的了,sapphire preferred一直都是开卡花3k刀给4w点, UA的卡嘛看自己账户有
: 没有5w的link咯,否则只有3w的.

i*l2020-03-31 07:03

5 楼

2和3申下来就够往返机票了

k*k2020-03-31 07:03

6 楼

UA卡现在去branch申可以都可以拿到花2000拿50k+5k的offer
我建议如果是买UA的票，可以找一下靠谱的代理，虽然有些不能用信用卡买，但是代理
能拿到的票可能要比你网站上看到的再减去信用卡能得到的积分(就算1 point=2 cent)
还要再便宜一些。如果是UA+CA的票可以尝试着iflychina上的，也能用信用卡买，不过
UA卡应该不能积双倍积分。但是无论能否用信用卡买，只要你的UA帐户和信用卡连接，
就能priority bording

g*n2020-03-31 07:03

7 楼

如果history够长，credit够好
申2+3
就够一张往返票了
2去官网申
3登录自己UA账户看有没有50k offer
没有的话，版上有帖子介绍，自己考古看看
还不行就去branch试试
1没用，不要申