Evita - 未名空间MITBBS历史存档

国际科技财经博客移民网络热点娱乐民生时事公众号

Redian新闻

>未名空间

>DVD - DVD

Evita

Evita# DVD - DVD

b*y2003-03-23 08:03

1 楼

surprised the list is only $14.99, and deepdiscount sell it for 8.89. who
need columbia house?
DVDs are cheaper now, but CDs are just
keep getting more expensive.

R*e2003-03-23 08:03

2 楼

These are typical old DVD re-prints. Usually the list price of the second
print DVDs are from $14.99 to $19.99 at most. So if you can wait, most of the
currect new DVDs will drop to that price range in one or two years. But if you
want to buy them now, columbiahouse's price is still way unbeatable.
This DVD is not even anamorphic. $8.89 is still too much IMO, hehe.

【在 b***y 的大作中提到】

: surprised the list is only $14.99, and deepdiscount sell it for 8.89. who
: need columbia house?
: DVDs are cheaper now, but CDs are just
: keep getting more expensive.

b*y2003-03-23 08:03

3 楼

is there a anamorphic version? will there ever be a anamorphic evita DVD?

the
you

【在 R****e 的大作中提到】

: These are typical old DVD re-prints. Usually the list price of the second
: print DVDs are from $14.99 to $19.99 at most. So if you can wait, most of the
: currect new DVDs will drop to that price range in one or two years. But if you
: want to buy them now, columbiahouse's price is still way unbeatable.
: This DVD is not even anamorphic. $8.89 is still too much IMO, hehe.

R*e2003-03-23 08:03

4 楼

Who knows? It depends on whether the studio think a re-release can make money.

who

【在 b***y 的大作中提到】

: is there a anamorphic version? will there ever be a anamorphic evita DVD?
:
: the
: you

b*y2003-03-23 08:03

5 楼

i hope HDDVD will replace current DVD soon.
it's coming!
http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/ptech/03/04/blue.dvd.reut/index.html

money.
second
of
if

【在 R****e 的大作中提到】

: Who knows? It depends on whether the studio think a re-release can make money.
:
: who

b*y2003-03-23 08:03

6 楼

CH is too limited. almost no foreign films.

the
you

【在 R****e 的大作中提到】

R*e2003-03-23 08:03

7 楼

Enrollment is quite limited. But once you got approved, as I said before, you
have choice of most popular mainstream DVDs. Nobody guaranteed you could find
each and every title in there. But if I want to buy a DVD, I'll first check if
CH has it.

who

【在 b***y 的大作中提到】

: CH is too limited. almost no foreign films.
:
: the
: you

b*y2003-03-23 08:03

8 楼

the earlier information was wrong. not bad for 8.99
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/stores/detail/-/dvd/6304806418/tech-info/
102-5880271-3863336
Technical Information
Release Information:
Studio: Disney Studios
Theatrical Release Date: December 25, 1996
DVD Release Date: March 4, 2003
Run Time: 135 minutes
Production Company: Hollywood Pictures Home Video
Package Type: Keep Case
Aspect Ratio(s):
Widescreen letterbox - 2.35:1
second
of
if

R*e2003-03-23 08:03

9 楼

What information was wrong?

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/stores/detail/-/dvd/6304806418/tech-info/
But
8.89.

【在 b***y 的大作中提到】

: the earlier information was wrong. not bad for 8.99
: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/stores/detail/-/dvd/6304806418/tech-info/
: 102-5880271-3863336
: Technical Information
: Release Information:
: Studio: Disney Studios
: Theatrical Release Date: December 25, 1996
: DVD Release Date: March 4, 2003
: Run Time: 135 minutes
: Production Company: Hollywood Pictures Home Video

b*y2003-03-23 08:03

10 楼

Widescreen letterbox - 2.35:1

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/stores/detail/-/dvd/6304806418/tech-info/
most

【在 R****e 的大作中提到】

: What information was wrong?
:
: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/stores/detail/-/dvd/6304806418/tech-info/
: But
: 8.89.

R*e2003-03-23 08:03

11 楼

Right, non-anamorphic widescreen letterbox 2.35:1, hehe.
Why you still haven't bought it since it's a good deal, anyway?

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/stores/detail/-/dvd/6304806418/tech-info/
years.
unbeatable.
hehe.

【在 b***y 的大作中提到】

: Widescreen letterbox - 2.35:1
:
: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/stores/detail/-/dvd/6304806418/tech-info/
: most

b*y2003-03-23 08:03

12 楼

confused. i guess anamorphic packs a little more resolution (how many more
lines?) into a 2.35:1 than a non-anamorphic, and the advantage will show on a
16:9 HD TV?
what is a "16x9 anamorphic TV"? there's 16x9 non-anamorphic TV?
http://www.dvdreview.com/html/lingo.shtml
Anamorphic, 16x9 enhanced

One of the most confusing terms of DVD has to be the anamorph

【在 R****e 的大作中提到】

: Right, non-anamorphic widescreen letterbox 2.35:1, hehe.
: Why you still haven't bought it since it's a good deal, anyway?
:
: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/stores/detail/-/dvd/6304806418/tech-info/
: years.
: unbeatable.
: hehe.

b*y2003-03-23 08:03

13 楼

i dont' have a big budget for DVDs, since i don't intent to build a
"collection"(don't see a purpose at all). i see everything will come out in
HDDVD in less than 5 years. and i don't usually watch a movie more than once
a year so buying does make economic sense. evita maybe an exception, since
it's a music video.
i'm still debating where to get my next batch, columbia house, playcentric,
buy.com or deepdiscount.

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/stores/detail/-/dvd/6304806418/tech-info/

【在 R****e 的大作中提到】

R*e2003-03-23 08:03

14 楼

That article really makes things more complicated...
I've never heard of "anamorphic TV"? How could a TV be anamorphic? When it's
16:9, it's 16:9. when it's 4:3, it's 4:3. However there're some 4:3 HD TVs
that have anamorphic mode, such as some high-end 36" Sony, it can squeeze the
vertical scan. It's like turning your 36" 4:3 TV to an about 33" (you can do
the math) 16:9 TV.
About the vertical resolution, anamorphic widescreen DVD vs. non-anamorphic
widescreen DVD should be (16/9)/(4/3) = 1.33.

【在 b***y 的大作中提到】

: confused. i guess anamorphic packs a little more resolution (how many more
: lines?) into a 2.35:1 than a non-anamorphic, and the advantage will show on a
: 16:9 HD TV?
: what is a "16x9 anamorphic TV"? there's 16x9 non-anamorphic TV?
: http://www.dvdreview.com/html/lingo.shtml
: Anamorphic, 16x9 enhanced
:
: One of the most confusing terms of DVD has to be the anamorph