Redian新闻
>
CIS has all approved EB2, EB3 case number
avatar
CIS has all approved EB2, EB3 case number# EB23 - 劳工卡
p*a
1
why it is still difficult to predict the 485 demand?
Just look at the number then you get the demand. any difficulty?
avatar
S*r
2
You mean USCIS has all the approved I-140 numbers? One approved I-140 can
produce multiple I-485s thanks to the derivative applicants.
Also, the applicant might have left the sponsoring company for whatever
reason before his/her PD becomes current--our Indian friends called it "DD"
-- Demand Destruction.
He or she might have moved to another category without backlog during the
wait: get married to a US citizen, upgraded to EB1 or EB5, became 带路党 in
Iraq or Afghanistan...just to name a few.
Helsinki has been told by USCIS that they don't use approved I-140s to count
demands.
avatar
V5
3

yes!, but from history, you can tell the factor , say, 1.2 - 5.2
with 99% confidence!
"
in
count

【在 S*******r 的大作中提到】
: You mean USCIS has all the approved I-140 numbers? One approved I-140 can
: produce multiple I-485s thanks to the derivative applicants.
: Also, the applicant might have left the sponsoring company for whatever
: reason before his/her PD becomes current--our Indian friends called it "DD"
: -- Demand Destruction.
: He or she might have moved to another category without backlog during the
: wait: get married to a US citizen, upgraded to EB1 or EB5, became 带路党 in
: Iraq or Afghanistan...just to name a few.
: Helsinki has been told by USCIS that they don't use approved I-140s to count
: demands.

avatar
p*a
4
One approved I-140 can : produce multiple I-485s
There should be a constant ratio, say 1: 1.5 for C, 1: 3 for I
________________________________________
the applicant might have left the sponsoring company for whatever
reason before his/her PD becomes current
The percentage of this situation would not be very high.
_____________________________________________________________
He or she might have moved to another category
USCIS should also have data for this movement.
__________________________________________________________
get married to a US citizen, upgraded to EB1 or EB5, became 带路党 in
USCIS should have data for this ,say, if he/she apply for family based or
eB1, EB5, he/she will deleted from the eb2 demand.
___________________________________________________________
"
in
count
avatar
V5
5
a simple linear regression suffices

【在 p*****a 的大作中提到】
: One approved I-140 can : produce multiple I-485s
: There should be a constant ratio, say 1: 1.5 for C, 1: 3 for I
: ________________________________________
: the applicant might have left the sponsoring company for whatever
: reason before his/her PD becomes current
: The percentage of this situation would not be very high.
: _____________________________________________________________
: He or she might have moved to another category
: USCIS should also have data for this movement.
: __________________________________________________________

avatar
S*r
6
Just because historically EB2C has a 1-1.5 ratio doesn't necessarily mean it
will be the case for the future. No one can guarantee that. Even if you can
name a 99% confidence interval, I seriously doubt USCIS would adopt it.
I agree with you that technically USCIS should have almost all the
information needed to accurately count the demand. However, whether or not
they are capable to interpolate the demand from all this information is the
real issue. Once again I do not think they can achieve it with the current
resources.

【在 p*****a 的大作中提到】
: One approved I-140 can : produce multiple I-485s
: There should be a constant ratio, say 1: 1.5 for C, 1: 3 for I
: ________________________________________
: the applicant might have left the sponsoring company for whatever
: reason before his/her PD becomes current
: The percentage of this situation would not be very high.
: _____________________________________________________________
: He or she might have moved to another category
: USCIS should also have data for this movement.
: __________________________________________________________

avatar
n*s
7
You should work for USCIS and develop a program.

【在 V5 的大作中提到】
: a simple linear regression suffices
avatar
a*9
8
它们就是不想说
avatar
p*a
9
up
相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。