大家都在反老印EB1C不反老中政庀 - 未名空间MITBBS历史存档

国际科技财经博客移民网络热点娱乐民生时事公众号

Redian新闻

>未名空间

>EB23 - 劳工卡

大家都在反老印EB1C不反老中政庀

大家都在反老印EB1C不反老中政庀# EB23 - 劳工卡

d*y2012-04-04 07:04

1 楼

上周面了个古德曼萨克斯的职位，见了见team，第二天就知道给拒了。俄，还没来得及
伤心，古德曼萨
克斯的HR就帮我联系了一个比较类似的职位，不同的一个组，但是级别低一点。
现在有点担心的就是上周刚满腔激情地说自己对产品评估感兴趣，这周马上就对产品监
控感兴趣是不是
不太靠谱？
怎么说得圆滑一点比较好呢？
虽然级别低，但是钱还是比现在多多了。。。如果要我我肯定就卖了=.=

w*s2012-04-04 07:04

2 楼

真是不知道怎么想的。

b*n2012-04-04 07:04

3 楼

什么乱七八糟的，别说不同的组不同的人，就算同一组人谁会记得你面试时候说的什么。

【在 d*****y 的大作中提到】

: 上周面了个古德曼萨克斯的职位，见了见team，第二天就知道给拒了。俄，还没来得及
: 伤心，古德曼萨
: 克斯的HR就帮我联系了一个比较类似的职位，不同的一个组，但是级别低一点。
: 现在有点担心的就是上周刚满腔激情地说自己对产品评估感兴趣，这周马上就对产品监
: 控感兴趣是不是
: 不太靠谱？
: 怎么说得圆滑一点比较好呢？
: 虽然级别低，但是钱还是比现在多多了。。。如果要我我肯定就卖了=.=

S*r2012-04-04 07:04

4 楼

老中政庇符合美国利益

w*s2012-04-04 07:04

5 楼

符合狗屁利益！
1.大多数连中文都说不清楚的，这些人能有在本国啥能量。你要是象赖昌星，王立军，
陈良宇等符合的，其他都是怎么回事呀？
2.大多数吃医保低收福利。
3.拉低整个美国道德标准：造假、不懂规矩、破坏次序。而且某些案例起了很大恶例的
榜样。
4.同样抢了失业率最高的美国低端工作人的工作，也拉低了工资水平。

b*h2012-04-04 07:04

6 楼

这些和你有个屁的关系，政屁也没占你的名额，
你现在只是个FJH，你还在关心美国的医保，福利，道德和低端工人的工作，是不是有
点吃多拉？

【在 w******s 的大作中提到】

: 符合狗屁利益！
: 1.大多数连中文都说不清楚的，这些人能有在本国啥能量。你要是象赖昌星，王立军，
: 陈良宇等符合的，其他都是怎么回事呀？
: 2.大多数吃医保低收福利。
: 3.拉低整个美国道德标准：造假、不懂规矩、破坏次序。而且某些案例起了很大恶例的
: 榜样。
: 4.同样抢了失业率最高的美国低端工作人的工作，也拉低了工资水平。

w*s2012-04-04 07:04

7 楼

对和我没关系，和你有屁关系总行了吧。
吃的再多，也没有你上面都是出气的。

【在 b********h 的大作中提到】

: 这些和你有个屁的关系，政屁也没占你的名额，
: 你现在只是个FJH，你还在关心美国的医保，福利，道德和低端工人的工作，是不是有
: 点吃多拉？

w*s2012-04-04 07:04

8 楼

还有人认为政庀不占国家名额。太傻太天真？

b*h2012-04-04 07:04

9 楼

真的是有人等绿卡都已经心理变态了，
认真劝你，去看一下心理医生。

【在 w******s 的大作中提到】

: 还有人认为政庀不占国家名额。太傻太天真？

f*u2012-04-04 07:04

10 楼

不关政屁占谁的名额，但这的确符合美国政府的利益。时不时拿政屁来说人权。老美不
傻，以前计划生育是好理由，可老美看到国内打击力度不是那么大了，几年前就开始配
额限制了。对其自身有利的，谁也不傻。哪个EB2/3敢说，离了他，老美玩不转？EB2/3
根本不是攻击国内主要筹码。

f*u2012-04-04 07:04

11 楼

还有，大家讨论的时候，不要求使用礼貌用语，但也不提倡非正常用语，当然这里的正
常是指大多数人认为的正常。

S*r2012-04-04 07:04

12 楼

EB1C直接关系到老中EB2能吃到多少剩余名额
对于EB2C这样每年指望剩余名额的类别
上流有多少用量至关重要
而且老印EB1C造假也是人尽皆知的
USCIS亦有针对性地加强了与之相关的L1A签证拒签率
天时地利人和俱备
唐人街的偷渡客走政庇绿卡（FLG\计划生育等等）多有造假
因此开庭后被法官否决的也在半数之上
至于藏独疆独
那是正儿八经的政庇
完全符合游戏规则
你要去反对
先问问手里握着强大国家机器的TG
忙乎了那么多年铲除这些境内民族极端份子了没
BTW
it's 政庇（bi第四声）
not 政庀
庀 pǐ
治理：“内朝，子将庀季氏之政焉”。
具备：庀工（具备动工条件，开始动工）。

w*s2012-04-04 07:04

13 楼

我搞不明白，我贴反政庀的贴子，要你出头呀？
你是搞政庀的还是智商低呀。
你也是吃多了，还不往下拉，尽在上面出气呀。

【在 b********h 的大作中提到】

: 真的是有人等绿卡都已经心理变态了，
: 认真劝你，去看一下心理医生。

w*s2012-04-04 07:04

14 楼

/3
你这个逻辑上根本不成立。
计划生育是中国的问题，反对中国的问题，不是帮忙改错吗，怎么又成了攻击中国呢？
EB23的作用和老美离开不开没有必然联系，但有一条，EB23都付税了。

【在 f*********u 的大作中提到】

: 不关政屁占谁的名额，但这的确符合美国政府的利益。时不时拿政屁来说人权。老美不
: 傻，以前计划生育是好理由，可老美看到国内打击力度不是那么大了，几年前就开始配
: 额限制了。对其自身有利的，谁也不傻。哪个EB2/3敢说，离了他，老美玩不转？EB2/3
: 根本不是攻击国内主要筹码。

d*u2012-04-04 07:04

15 楼

有中国政庇的审批数据么？

w*s2012-04-04 07:04

16 楼

EB1C是显性的指标来占名额。EB1C也不光是印度的，而且有些EB1C的作用，对全球化经
济不管是开端，演化，还是补充，都是有些硬性条件的。我不反对移民局对这些
VERIFICATION。而不是针对这。
藏独疆独本来就是玩火的，老美脑子不清楚，将来还是玩火上身的。
还有我中文不好，我是出生在这的你信吗？

【在 S*******r 的大作中提到】

: EB1C直接关系到老中EB2能吃到多少剩余名额
: 对于EB2C这样每年指望剩余名额的类别
: 上流有多少用量至关重要
: 而且老印EB1C造假也是人尽皆知的
: USCIS亦有针对性地加强了与之相关的L1A签证拒签率
: 天时地利人和俱备
: 唐人街的偷渡客走政庇绿卡（FLG\计划生育等等）多有造假
: 因此开庭后被法官否决的也在半数之上
: 至于藏独疆独
: 那是正儿八经的政庇

b*h2012-04-04 07:04

17 楼

这个bbs是你家开的？
你能贴反政屁，我就不能支持政屁？支持政屁就是搞政屁？从这逻辑就知道你的智商。

【在 w******s 的大作中提到】

:
: EB1C是显性的指标来占名额。EB1C也不光是印度的，而且有些EB1C的作用，对全球化经
: 济不管是开端，演化，还是补充，都是有些硬性条件的。我不反对移民局对这些
: VERIFICATION。而不是针对这。
: 藏独疆独本来就是玩火的，老美脑子不清楚，将来还是玩火上身的。
: 还有我中文不好，我是出生在这的你信吗？

S*r2012-04-04 07:04

18 楼

计划生育对中国到底是利是弊美国人don't give a rat ass
只要能引申到中国人权问题上
就是好的操作命题
因此符合美国利益
and good luck arguing with USCIS/DOS just because you pay taxes...

【在 w******s 的大作中提到】

w*s2012-04-04 07:04

19 楼

对人出言不逊的大概出恭也不好吧？

w*s2012-04-04 07:04

20 楼

If it is not an issue,why they want to give the shit.
USCIS is US　government agency,the tax budget is including its expense.

【在 S*******r 的大作中提到】

: 计划生育对中国到底是利是弊美国人don't give a rat ass
: 只要能引申到中国人权问题上
: 就是好的操作命题
: 因此符合美国利益
: and good luck arguing with USCIS/DOS just because you pay taxes...

S*r2012-04-04 07:04

21 楼

我不是很明白你反政庇的原因是什么？
如果是为了EB2C的利益
那我上面已经告诉你了
反对EB1C更加直接更加有效
如果你是为了其他目的（比如说中美外交关系、经济全球化、美国国家安全 etc）
恐怕其他版面更适合你这个帖子

【在 w******s 的大作中提到】

:
: If it is not an issue,why they want to give the shit.
: USCIS is US　government agency,the tax budget is including its expense.

S*r2012-04-04 07:04

22 楼

I never said it's not an issue. They care about it only because they can use
it to serve their national interest.
USCIS is one of(not sure if it's the only one) US government agencies whose
operations are NOT supported by tax money but applicants' fee.

【在 w******s 的大作中提到】

:
: If it is not an issue,why they want to give the shit.
: USCIS is US　government agency,the tax budget is including its expense.

w*s2012-04-04 07:04

23 楼

use
whose
Where did you get the clue the USCIS is running by the the applicants's fee?
IF they could not ground the main and clear reason for their national
interests,why they play for it? For Fun?

【在 S*******r 的大作中提到】

: I never said it's not an issue. They care about it only because they can use
: it to serve their national interest.
: USCIS is one of(not sure if it's the only one) US government agencies whose
: operations are NOT supported by tax money but applicants' fee.

S*r2012-04-04 07:04

24 楼

Like I said, if you want to discuss about the US foreign policy, you are at
the wrong board. Plus I don't think it's your business to worry about the
consequence of how US identify their national interest -- you can surely
discuss about it anyway you want but once again I don't think this board is
a good place for this kind of topic.
Now about the USCIS' funding:
Funding
Unlike most other federal agencies, USCIS is funded almost entirely by user
fees.[5] Under President George W. Bush's FY2008 budget request, direct
congressional appropriations made about 1% of the USCIS budget and about 99%
of the budget was funded through fees. The total USCIS FY2008 budget was
projected to be $2.6 billion.[6]
source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Citizenship_and_Immigration_Services#Funding

fee?

【在 w******s 的大作中提到】

:
: use
: whose
: Where did you get the clue the USCIS is running by the the applicants's fee?
: IF they could not ground the main and clear reason for their national
: interests,why they play for it? For Fun?

w*s2012-04-04 07:04

25 楼

Could you tell me WIKI is the authorized source by the any government?
If it is the budget,could they predict the figures if no estimated
applicants(like no quote asylum) was preset.
Is it 1% true?

S*r2012-04-04 07:04

26 楼

So you are saying wiki is bullshiting? then please provide your evidence
that USCIS is running on tax money.
If you want to argue for your greencard or some other benefits with USCIS or
any other US government agencies just because you pay taxes, be my guest.
Let me know how it goes.

【在 w******s 的大作中提到】

: Could you tell me WIKI is the authorized source by the any government?
: If it is the budget,could they predict the figures if no estimated
: applicants(like no quote asylum) was preset.
: Is it 1% true?

w*s2012-04-04 07:04

27 楼

I am telling you.
The applicant fee is most of part of USCIS but not count on it.
Also Immigration affairs is not only judged by USCIS.ICE and Immigration
Court all related to the issue are considered.

S*r2012-04-04 07:04

28 楼

you are funny man
first you claimed USCIS use taxpayers' money to operate
then you asserted wiki is lying about a simple fact that 80% of people on
this board clearly be aware of
now you are saying USCIS do not count on users fee even though it consists
of the 99% of its expense
please get your fact straight.
And btw "I am telling you" is not an evidence.

【在 w******s 的大作中提到】

: I am telling you.
: The applicant fee is most of part of USCIS but not count on it.
: Also Immigration affairs is not only judged by USCIS.ICE and Immigration
: Court all related to the issue are considered.

w*s2012-04-04 07:04

29 楼

As you are not clear minded and could not tell the good or ill concept,so I
am telling you.
What you provided Wiki source,I never use it as the main fact just for the
reference.From INS age,they never count on it until 2008,furthermore 2008
one year figure does not represent all the time.1% is estimated by your
source.
Once again even if USCIS officer could deny the case,the person could win
again in the court.
Tell me the court and judge fund are from?

w*s2012-04-04 07:04

30 楼

BTW,until now nobody are cleard by USCIS operation inside as it is US
government agency,no obligation to responsible for all the aliens.
Tax fund and application fee for USCIS are not disclosed to you either.
But for sure,if less application fee,USCIS will go to ask for the budget.It
is not commercial agency.

w*s2012-04-04 07:04

31 楼

The application fee supports USCIS operation under the request by congress,
does not mean USCIS do not need other resource to work.

S*r2012-04-04 07:04

32 楼

You can interprete the wiki or any other information anyway you want. Bottom
line is there is no way someone can use his/her taxpayer status to argue
for some non-constitutional privileges such as green cards regardless of the
funding source of the related government agencies. Like I said before, you
can certainly try so. Just let me and everyone here on this board know how
it goes.

It

【在 w******s 的大作中提到】

: BTW,until now nobody are cleard by USCIS operation inside as it is US
: government agency,no obligation to responsible for all the aliens.
: Tax fund and application fee for USCIS are not disclosed to you either.
: But for sure,if less application fee,USCIS will go to ask for the budget.It
: is not commercial agency.

l*l2012-04-04 07:04

33 楼

对于发个帖子上来就跟疯狗一样急着咬的，我都悄悄路过。
有些人真是等绿卡都变态了。心里不平衡到这样。不服你也去办啊。

w*s2012-04-04 07:04

34 楼

悄悄路过，就不要上来冒傻泡。
没人不服，就是看到狗屎，说是臭的。有些人生活在狗屎堆里，不觉得。尽管这个
Analogy不针对人任何人，有人还是对号入座。
况且跟此类人物根本没得比较。
失敬！失敬！

w*s2012-04-04 07:04

35 楼

Bottom
the
you
What I mentioned,the tax-paying is the sufficient condition not the
necessary condition.
Beyond the point,the category is not classified by us.
The bottom line is what the real situation is all in mess order.

【在 S*******r 的大作中提到】

: You can interprete the wiki or any other information anyway you want. Bottom
: line is there is no way someone can use his/her taxpayer status to argue
: for some non-constitutional privileges such as green cards regardless of the
: funding source of the related government agencies. Like I said before, you
: can certainly try so. Just let me and everyone here on this board know how
: it goes.
:
: It