a*r
2 楼
我的Case 的背景是这样的:
Physics PHD, 6 papers (2 PRE, 1 PRL, 2 Plos One, 1 J. Of Cond Matt ) 5 first
author, 63 (around 60 are independent citation ) citation according to
google scholar.
我收到如下的RFE:
Evidence of the petitioner's original scientific, scholarly, artistic, or
business_related contributions of major significance in the field:
Counsel has submitted several letters of testimony from others in the
petitioner's field. while the writers describe the field and its importance,
they offer no detail about how the petitioner's own work as been of major
significance of the field beyond the institutions who have employed him.
For example, ... 列举了我的两封推荐信,说the writers did not describe in any
detail how the petitioner's work has been of major importance to
institutions beyond those that have employed him.
我想再补上两封independent的推荐信,除此之外也想不出还有什么方法?
In addition, the record includes several research articles that have cited
the petitioner's collaborative research, showing a moderate citation level,
however it is not apparent that these represent the total number of
citations the petitioner's work has received. The petitioner's own list of
citations is insufficient as it is not primary evidence such as an online
citation index.
不知道最后一句话是什么意思? 难道google scholar 打出的citation list 不够权威
?在其它网站找到我的citation要少一些...
The petitioner should also submit concise evidence of the number of
independent citations his published work has received, such as screen prints
of an online citation index. The evidence must identify citing authors in
order to distinguish independent citations from self citations by the
petitioner and his collaborators.
如何强调independent citation? 可不可以打出google scholar citation list, 然后
highlight citing author以及他们的institutions?
现在没什么头绪,觉得很受挫折,很感谢任何建议。
谢谢
Physics PHD, 6 papers (2 PRE, 1 PRL, 2 Plos One, 1 J. Of Cond Matt ) 5 first
author, 63 (around 60 are independent citation ) citation according to
google scholar.
我收到如下的RFE:
Evidence of the petitioner's original scientific, scholarly, artistic, or
business_related contributions of major significance in the field:
Counsel has submitted several letters of testimony from others in the
petitioner's field. while the writers describe the field and its importance,
they offer no detail about how the petitioner's own work as been of major
significance of the field beyond the institutions who have employed him.
For example, ... 列举了我的两封推荐信,说the writers did not describe in any
detail how the petitioner's work has been of major importance to
institutions beyond those that have employed him.
我想再补上两封independent的推荐信,除此之外也想不出还有什么方法?
In addition, the record includes several research articles that have cited
the petitioner's collaborative research, showing a moderate citation level,
however it is not apparent that these represent the total number of
citations the petitioner's work has received. The petitioner's own list of
citations is insufficient as it is not primary evidence such as an online
citation index.
不知道最后一句话是什么意思? 难道google scholar 打出的citation list 不够权威
?在其它网站找到我的citation要少一些...
The petitioner should also submit concise evidence of the number of
independent citations his published work has received, such as screen prints
of an online citation index. The evidence must identify citing authors in
order to distinguish independent citations from self citations by the
petitioner and his collaborators.
如何强调independent citation? 可不可以打出google scholar citation list, 然后
highlight citing author以及他们的institutions?
现在没什么头绪,觉得很受挫折,很感谢任何建议。
谢谢
b*y
3 楼
EB2 PD 2012年11月,六月一号FILE485后除了打指纹就一直没有消息。EB3 APPROVED
140也有。
今天收到notice,说是为了加快处理速度,把我的CASE从TSC给转移到了这个地址
USCIS-NBC, PO BOX648005, Lee's Summit, MO 64064
还说以后都是这里会告诉我有啥DECISION.
不知道还有谁也有同样的经历?这是什么意思那?我的PD说早不早,说晚不晚,我前面
的一堆2010, 2011,甚至2012的PD,我自己的CASE就更没啥好说的
了,要说是给INTERVIEW,那就是浪费大家时间,我从开始上班就在这个公司
,婚姻比上班时间还长,一直是H1B,绿卡所有的东西都是公司找的大律师楼做的,不
敢说有多好,但是还是很认真负责的,最少不该有啥基本上的错误,所有公证也是国内
公证处做的。体检要到明年5月下旬过期。真是不知道是啥意思,是好是坏啊?
求助版花了。
140也有。
今天收到notice,说是为了加快处理速度,把我的CASE从TSC给转移到了这个地址
USCIS-NBC, PO BOX648005, Lee's Summit, MO 64064
还说以后都是这里会告诉我有啥DECISION.
不知道还有谁也有同样的经历?这是什么意思那?我的PD说早不早,说晚不晚,我前面
的一堆2010, 2011,甚至2012的PD,我自己的CASE就更没啥好说的
了,要说是给INTERVIEW,那就是浪费大家时间,我从开始上班就在这个公司
,婚姻比上班时间还长,一直是H1B,绿卡所有的东西都是公司找的大律师楼做的,不
敢说有多好,但是还是很认真负责的,最少不该有啥基本上的错误,所有公证也是国内
公证处做的。体检要到明年5月下旬过期。真是不知道是啥意思,是好是坏啊?
求助版花了。
P*e
4 楼
见过做data mining的BI,也见过做industry research的BI。总的来说还是以数据、信
息驱动商业为主要内容。
息驱动商业为主要内容。
b*e
5 楼
这些意思就是说你的RL 写得很糟糕. 这种情况都是因为RL里面使用太多的general
description所致. 可以参看genegun老枪的文章关于如何写RL. Kathy的文章里面也提
及了RL一些框架,供参考.
first
importance,
【在 a***r 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 我的Case 的背景是这样的:
: Physics PHD, 6 papers (2 PRE, 1 PRL, 2 Plos One, 1 J. Of Cond Matt ) 5 first
: author, 63 (around 60 are independent citation ) citation according to
: google scholar.
: 我收到如下的RFE:
: Evidence of the petitioner's original scientific, scholarly, artistic, or
: business_related contributions of major significance in the field:
: Counsel has submitted several letters of testimony from others in the
: petitioner's field. while the writers describe the field and its importance,
: they offer no detail about how the petitioner's own work as been of major
description所致. 可以参看genegun老枪的文章关于如何写RL. Kathy的文章里面也提
及了RL一些框架,供参考.
first
importance,
【在 a***r 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 我的Case 的背景是这样的:
: Physics PHD, 6 papers (2 PRE, 1 PRL, 2 Plos One, 1 J. Of Cond Matt ) 5 first
: author, 63 (around 60 are independent citation ) citation according to
: google scholar.
: 我收到如下的RFE:
: Evidence of the petitioner's original scientific, scholarly, artistic, or
: business_related contributions of major significance in the field:
: Counsel has submitted several letters of testimony from others in the
: petitioner's field. while the writers describe the field and its importance,
: they offer no detail about how the petitioner's own work as been of major
m*r
6 楼
既然是律师做的。。。。找律师问呀。
比较靠谱。
【在 b****y 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: EB2 PD 2012年11月,六月一号FILE485后除了打指纹就一直没有消息。EB3 APPROVED
: 140也有。
: 今天收到notice,说是为了加快处理速度,把我的CASE从TSC给转移到了这个地址
: USCIS-NBC, PO BOX648005, Lee's Summit, MO 64064
: 还说以后都是这里会告诉我有啥DECISION.
: 不知道还有谁也有同样的经历?这是什么意思那?我的PD说早不早,说晚不晚,我前面
: 的一堆2010, 2011,甚至2012的PD,我自己的CASE就更没啥好说的
: 了,要说是给INTERVIEW,那就是浪费大家时间,我从开始上班就在这个公司
: ,婚姻比上班时间还长,一直是H1B,绿卡所有的东西都是公司找的大律师楼做的,不
: 敢说有多好,但是还是很认真负责的,最少不该有啥基本上的错误,所有公证也是国内
比较靠谱。
【在 b****y 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: EB2 PD 2012年11月,六月一号FILE485后除了打指纹就一直没有消息。EB3 APPROVED
: 140也有。
: 今天收到notice,说是为了加快处理速度,把我的CASE从TSC给转移到了这个地址
: USCIS-NBC, PO BOX648005, Lee's Summit, MO 64064
: 还说以后都是这里会告诉我有啥DECISION.
: 不知道还有谁也有同样的经历?这是什么意思那?我的PD说早不早,说晚不晚,我前面
: 的一堆2010, 2011,甚至2012的PD,我自己的CASE就更没啥好说的
: 了,要说是给INTERVIEW,那就是浪费大家时间,我从开始上班就在这个公司
: ,婚姻比上班时间还长,一直是H1B,绿卡所有的东西都是公司找的大律师楼做的,不
: 敢说有多好,但是还是很认真负责的,最少不该有啥基本上的错误,所有公证也是国内
s*u
7 楼
国内有啊,还挺多的
像银联之类的公司都需要用商业智能了,哈哈,国内是这么叫的
像银联之类的公司都需要用商业智能了,哈哈,国内是这么叫的
r*y
8 楼
citation少你是不是没强调top percentage?我inde的也不多,不过加上了中文的凑数
,不知道会不会也被REF..
first
importance,
【在 a***r 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 我的Case 的背景是这样的:
: Physics PHD, 6 papers (2 PRE, 1 PRL, 2 Plos One, 1 J. Of Cond Matt ) 5 first
: author, 63 (around 60 are independent citation ) citation according to
: google scholar.
: 我收到如下的RFE:
: Evidence of the petitioner's original scientific, scholarly, artistic, or
: business_related contributions of major significance in the field:
: Counsel has submitted several letters of testimony from others in the
: petitioner's field. while the writers describe the field and its importance,
: they offer no detail about how the petitioner's own work as been of major
,不知道会不会也被REF..
first
importance,
【在 a***r 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 我的Case 的背景是这样的:
: Physics PHD, 6 papers (2 PRE, 1 PRL, 2 Plos One, 1 J. Of Cond Matt ) 5 first
: author, 63 (around 60 are independent citation ) citation according to
: google scholar.
: 我收到如下的RFE:
: Evidence of the petitioner's original scientific, scholarly, artistic, or
: business_related contributions of major significance in the field:
: Counsel has submitted several letters of testimony from others in the
: petitioner's field. while the writers describe the field and its importance,
: they offer no detail about how the petitioner's own work as been of major
b*g
9 楼
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/EB23/32483923.html
最近好多case转center的
最近好多case转center的
l*n
11 楼
之前班上有个mm的case也是转lee summit,后来interview了,然后排期退了,又催了n
久终于绿了。
转center不可怕。
久终于绿了。
转center不可怕。
b*y
13 楼
律师说了,很正常,活多,人家干不过来,就这样。
a*r
17 楼
谢谢大蜜蜂,除了RL,帮忙看看citation的回复是啥意思?
a*r
18 楼
谢谢大蜜蜂,除了RL,帮忙看看citation的回复是啥意思?
a*r
20 楼
谢谢大蜜蜂,除了RL,帮忙看看citation的回复是啥意思?
a*r
22 楼
谢谢大蜜蜂,除了RL,帮忙看看citation的回复是啥意思?
a*r
24 楼
谢谢大蜜蜂,除了RL,帮忙看看citation的回复是啥意思?
C*d
25 楼
是pp的么?
first
importance,
【在 a***r 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 我的Case 的背景是这样的:
: Physics PHD, 6 papers (2 PRE, 1 PRL, 2 Plos One, 1 J. Of Cond Matt ) 5 first
: author, 63 (around 60 are independent citation ) citation according to
: google scholar.
: 我收到如下的RFE:
: Evidence of the petitioner's original scientific, scholarly, artistic, or
: business_related contributions of major significance in the field:
: Counsel has submitted several letters of testimony from others in the
: petitioner's field. while the writers describe the field and its importance,
: they offer no detail about how the petitioner's own work as been of major
first
importance,
【在 a***r 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 我的Case 的背景是这样的:
: Physics PHD, 6 papers (2 PRE, 1 PRL, 2 Plos One, 1 J. Of Cond Matt ) 5 first
: author, 63 (around 60 are independent citation ) citation according to
: google scholar.
: 我收到如下的RFE:
: Evidence of the petitioner's original scientific, scholarly, artistic, or
: business_related contributions of major significance in the field:
: Counsel has submitted several letters of testimony from others in the
: petitioner's field. while the writers describe the field and its importance,
: they offer no detail about how the petitioner's own work as been of major
a*r
28 楼
没敢pp
P*F
33 楼
DIY? Pay more attention to details, especially you have limited articles and
citations!
first
importance,
【在 a***r 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 我的Case 的背景是这样的:
: Physics PHD, 6 papers (2 PRE, 1 PRL, 2 Plos One, 1 J. Of Cond Matt ) 5 first
: author, 63 (around 60 are independent citation ) citation according to
: google scholar.
: 我收到如下的RFE:
: Evidence of the petitioner's original scientific, scholarly, artistic, or
: business_related contributions of major significance in the field:
: Counsel has submitted several letters of testimony from others in the
: petitioner's field. while the writers describe the field and its importance,
: they offer no detail about how the petitioner's own work as been of major
citations!
first
importance,
【在 a***r 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 我的Case 的背景是这样的:
: Physics PHD, 6 papers (2 PRE, 1 PRL, 2 Plos One, 1 J. Of Cond Matt ) 5 first
: author, 63 (around 60 are independent citation ) citation according to
: google scholar.
: 我收到如下的RFE:
: Evidence of the petitioner's original scientific, scholarly, artistic, or
: business_related contributions of major significance in the field:
: Counsel has submitted several letters of testimony from others in the
: petitioner's field. while the writers describe the field and its importance,
: they offer no detail about how the petitioner's own work as been of major
相关阅读
Can I study when F1 is pending?问个485被RFE的问题中国为什么收紧签证政策? (转载)公司律师这么说能相信吗??!!拿到EAD+AP卡意味着什么?Upcoming month's visa bulletin: September 2012 (Coming Soon)FY2012没有SO了?怎么开始讨论FY2013的啦?面试后。。。2011.3的PD,啥时候能提交485?Perm难点,还是I-140难点?demand data out20伪币答谢!这里有历史专业的人吗,请验证这个故事是否是史实!办PERM, I140,绿卡可以回国吗?140 eb2交上去快2个月了,为什么还是没有消息呢?Are PERM applicants the best and the brightest?140 Approved找律师最关键是否perm阶段?每个国家每年有2803个EB2名额?RFE发到公司律师那里去了,正常吗?