【EB2 2017年11月第4绿】EB2 NSC PD2013/6# EB23 - 劳工卡
c*c
1 楼
Hi, Old guru and all experienced brothers and sisters,
My questions come from the post: http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t1/Immigration/32685835_0_2.html and some kind replies actually confused me. So I want to ask publicly for opinions.
1. May I ask what new evidence can be used when RFED?
It appears to me now that newer stronger reference letter definitely works.
2. Will any new Citations to old papers published before I-140 submission or
RFE date, but shown in database after RFE or the date that I-140 is
submitted is useful or not?
3. How about new articles published after I-140 submission or RFE date ?
4. How about new reviews?
In addition, is it I-140 submission or RFE date since it can be a long time
difference.
Thanks for your attentions and reply!
发信人: FlyGao11 (FeiGao), 信区: Immigration
标 题: Re: NSC EB1A 140被RFE，求助
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Dec 11 13:41:26 2012, 美东)
I am not sure if I am right, but from what I learned here,
(1) new evidence after RFE are not counted, or not MUCH counted.
(2) the new Reference letter for RFE has to be even more supportive than
your original submission. This directly leads to the approval decision.
(3) I did not have any letter from China, But I believe it matters more "
what is written in the letter" compared to "who writes the letter." I
Good luck!
发信人: nancy131492 (nancy), 信区: Immigration
标 题: Re: NSC EB1A 140被RFE，求助
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Dec 11 14:45:43 2012, 美东)
以前看有人用了，也有人说，他用了回复 RFE，结果被deny了说提交后的证据不算。
My questions come from the post: http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t1/Immigration/32685835_0_2.html and some kind replies actually confused me. So I want to ask publicly for opinions.
1. May I ask what new evidence can be used when RFED?
It appears to me now that newer stronger reference letter definitely works.
2. Will any new Citations to old papers published before I-140 submission or
RFE date, but shown in database after RFE or the date that I-140 is
submitted is useful or not?
3. How about new articles published after I-140 submission or RFE date ?
4. How about new reviews?
In addition, is it I-140 submission or RFE date since it can be a long time
difference.
Thanks for your attentions and reply!
发信人: FlyGao11 (FeiGao), 信区: Immigration
标 题: Re: NSC EB1A 140被RFE，求助
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Dec 11 13:41:26 2012, 美东)
I am not sure if I am right, but from what I learned here,
(1) new evidence after RFE are not counted, or not MUCH counted.
(2) the new Reference letter for RFE has to be even more supportive than
your original submission. This directly leads to the approval decision.
(3) I did not have any letter from China, But I believe it matters more "
what is written in the letter" compared to "who writes the letter." I
Good luck!
发信人: nancy131492 (nancy), 信区: Immigration
标 题: Re: NSC EB1A 140被RFE，求助
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Dec 11 14:45:43 2012, 美东)
以前看有人用了，也有人说，他用了回复 RFE，结果被deny了说提交后的证据不算。
